|
|
CHAPTER 12Integration of the European Government Bond Markets
The establishment of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) on 1 January 1999 paved the way for greater integration of European government bond markets. Prior to the introduction of the euro, yields on government bonds varied greatly among the future euro area member states, primarily as a result of exchange-rate risk. Parallel with the introduction of the euro, a market-driven integration process has taken place. For example, market conventions have been harmonised among European issuers, and international electronic trading platforms have become more widespread. In addition, the market for euro-denominated interest-rate swaps has developed considerably, and today, fixed-income securities in the euro area are typically priced on the basis of this market. In this way, the national government bond markets are interconnected. The integration of the bond markets has contributed to reducing yield spreads across the euro area. The narrow yield spreads still existing today, are primarily attributable to differences in credit risk and liquidity among the euro area member states.[1]
12.1 NARROWING OF YIELD SPREADSPrior to the introduction of the euro, the European government bond markets were characterised by relatively large differences in yields. For example, yield spreads vis-à-vis Germany ranged up to 700 basis points in the 1990s, cf. Chart 12.1.1.[2] A number of factors contributed to the considerable variation in yield spreads. One of the most important was uncertainty regarding future exchange-rate fluctuations. Moreover, there were also differences in market conventions, public regulation such as investment rules[3], varying taxation rules, credit risk and liquidity.
With EMU, exchange-rate fluctuations within the euro area have been eliminated and progress has been made in harmonising national tax rules. In addition, the introduction of the euro, combined with technological advances, has stimulated a market-driven integration process. As a result, European yield spreads have narrowed considerably, and today are attributable primarily to differences in liquidity and credit risk. 12.2 MARKET-DRIVEN INTEGRATIONIntensified competition Market conventions
It is important to emphasise that the harmonisation could have taken place without EMU, but in connection with the transition to the euro it was natural to harmonise the market conventions as well. The harmonisation of market conventions thus went hand in hand with the introduction of the euro. Liquidity dispersed among many issuers As a result, coordinated issuance has been considered to bring together liquidity from several member states. In 2000, the European Commission published the Giovannini Group's report, " Co-ordinated Public Debt Issuance in the Euro Area" .[5] The report pointed out that joint issues could be an advantage for the small member states in particular since higher liquidity premiums could reduce their costs. The report examined four initiatives that, to different degrees, would lead to increased coordination of government debt policies, cf. Box 12.1.
Today, a certain degree of coordination of technical aspects is seen among European issuers, cf. the EFC Sub-Committee on EU Government Bonds and Bills Markets (the Thomsen Group).[6] However none of the other initiatives have been implemented. The intensified market integration, since the publication of the report, has reduced the problem of split liquidity. The interest-rate swap market
The euro swap curve is used as the reference for the pricing of bonds since it is independent of coupon size and based on an average of the credit ratings of the most creditworthy banks. This means that the curve is not dependent on the credit rating of a single issuer.[7] In view of the ample liquidity in the market for euro-denominated interest-rate swaps, fixed-income securities in the euro area are now typically priced on the basis of the standardised euro swap curve. The euro-denominated interest-rate swap market has thus achieved the same status as US government securities in the dollar-denominated market in terms of the pricing of fixed-income securities and interconnects the national European markets for government securities. Electronic trading platforms Primary dealers
The introduction of electronic trading platforms, and the standardisation of market conventions, also enable dealers to operate in several national markets, which enhances familiarity with all markets. At the same time trading costs have been reduced. Furthermore, the presence of the primary dealers has helped to secure liquidity in the government securities. 12.3 ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL INTEGRATIONIn an integrated market without any barriers to international investment, bond yields will to a greater extent react to information that is relevant for the entire integrated market. One measure of the degree of financial integration is the extent to which yield movements in the euro market is reflected in the yield on government bonds issued by a given country. The German government bond market is used as the euro area reference in the analysis. The analysis below therefore assesses the degree to which the change in the 10-year German bond yield can explain fluctuations in yields in the sovereign bond markets, cf. Box 12.2.
Increased financial integration entails that the estimated a-values in the regression in Box 12.2 converge towards zero, since interest-rate fluctuations in one country should not be systematically larger or smaller than the changes in the reference. The development in the estimated α-values is illustrated in Chart 12.3.1, which thus illustrates the integration process over time. It is seen that the estimated a-values were volatile until 1999, after which they are approximately zero. After 1999 the Danish α-values are more volatile than those of the euro area member states.
Increased financial integration also entails that the estimated β-values converge towards 1, since this implies that interest-rate changes across the integrated market are driven by the same factors. Chart 12.3.2 shows that the estimated β-values rose substantially in 1999 when the euro was introduced, and have subsequently converged towards 1.
12.4 EXPLANATION OF CURRENT YIELD SPREADS IN THE EURO AREAYield spreads still exist between the euro area member states. On average, the euro area yield spreads have narrowed by 14 basis points since 1999, to a current average of 7 basis points. However, Greece, Italy and Portugal still have double-digit yield spreads, which in fact have widened in recent years. This reflects that since 2004 the budget deficit as a ratio of GDP has exceeded 3 per cent in all three countries. In view of the single currency and the high degree of market harmonisation, the current yield spreads are primarily attributable to variations in liquidity and credit risk among issuers. This virtually also applies to Denmark due to Denmark's fixed exchange-rate policy vis-à-vis the euro. Credit risk The credit risk on a government bond depends primarily on the issuer's debt ratio and the tax base. For example, a higher debt ratio will make government finances more exposed to cyclical fluctuations and changes in interest rates, which increases the risk that the debt is downgraded.[9] Downgrading often coincides with a widening of the spread, and thus a capital loss. In general, recent years have seen very small variations in yield spreads compared with differences in fiscal-policy conditions. However, the relation between the development in yield spreads and in the debt-to-GDP ratio is positive, cf. Chart 12.4.1. For example, Denmark's gross government debt as a ratio of GDP declined 29 percentage points in the period 1999-2006, while Germany's debt rose by 7 percentage points. Denmark's debt thus declined by 36 percentage points of GDP relative to Germany. In the same period, the Danish yield spread vis-à-vis Germany narrowed by 42 basis points.
Liquidity Increased competition among government issuers has increased the focus on achieving sound liquidity in the bond series issued. This should be viewed against the fact that even in the short term government debt offices can improve liquidity in government securities. On the other hand, the market's perception of credit risk is more difficult for the issuer to influence since the credit risk is primarily dependent on the general fiscal-policy development. The focus on liquidity has led to strategy adjustments in several EU member states. For example, there has been a tendency for the government bond market to concentrate issues on fewer, but larger series.[10] This creates the conditions for substantial liquidity and thereby lower financing costs.
The bid-ask spread for a bond, i.e. the cost of purchasing a security and then selling it immediately after, is an indicator of liquidity.[11] Chart 12.4.2 shows that since the introduction of the euro the average bid-ask spreads have narrowed. The narrowing of the bid-ask spreads indicates that liquidity has generally improved in the period. However, liquidity still has an impact on European yield spreads. Empirical studies have shown that liquidity is particularly important for countries with low credit risk, and in periods of high uncertainty in the markets.[12] Breakdown of yield spreads by credit risk and liquidity
Greece, Italy and Portugal are virtually the only member states paying a credit risk premium relative to Germany. Liquidity primarily affects the yield spreads among the small issuers. [1] This Chapter is inspired by Governor Jens Thomsen's speech at the European Government Bond Summit, October 2006, European bond markets before and after the euro, which is available at Danmarks Nationalbank's website, www.nationalbanken.dk. [2] Germany is used as a reference since the long-term German government bond had the lowest yield at the beginning of Stage 3 of EMU. In addition, German bonds accounted for the largest share of the total outstanding volume of euro-denominated bonds. [3] For example, financial institutions were subject to requirements of maximum exposure limits against certain countries. [4] Home bias covers the tendency of investors to limit their holdings to the domestic market. [5] The Giovannini Group advises the European Commission on issues concerning integration of capital markets in the Economic and Monetary Union. The reports of the Giovannini Group can be downloaded from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/giovannini_en.htm. [6] See http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/efc_en.htm for an overview of coordination among European issuers. [7] The relation between the swap curve and the credit ratings of private banks entails that bonds from government issuers are typically traded at a yield that is lower than the swap yield curve. [8] MTS has become the dominant trading platform in the wholesale market. See Celent (2004): Electronic Trading in European Fixed Income Markets. [9] It is rare for a central government to default on its obligations. Among the few examples are Russia in 1998 and Argentina in 2001. [10] Bonds with a volume of up to euro 20 billion constitute 80 per cent of the total bond market in the euro area, while bonds with a volume of up to euro 5 billion only constitute 4 per cent. Bonds with a volume of up to euro 500 million have almost vanished. Source: The Euro Bond Market Study, ECB, December 2004. [11] There are other key liquidity measures besides the bid-ask spread, e.g. order coverage, depth and turnover. For an analysis of various key liquidity measures see Michael J. Fleming, Measuring Treasury Market Liquidity, FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 2003. [12] See Beber, Alessandro, Michael W. Brandt and Kenneth A. Kavajecz, Flight-to-Quality or Flight-to-Liquidity? Evidence From the Euro-Area Bond Market, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 12376. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||