Title: Report and Accounts 2000
Subtitle:
Creator: Danmarks Nationalbank
Contributor: J. H. Schultz Grafisk A/S (Print) and J. H. Schultz Grafisk A/S (Web)
Publisher: Danmarks Nationalbank
Institution: Danmarks Nationalbank
Copyright: Danmarks Nationalbank
Series:
Notes:
Subject:
Summary:
Language: eng
Identifier ISBN:
Identifier ISSN: 1398-3849
Price: 0 DKK
URL: http://www.nationalbanken.dk/
Alternativ URL:
Version: 1,0
Date: 2001-03-29
Format: gif; html; css; pdf; jpg
Inventory: index.htm, kolofon.htm, fig.htm, ttab.htm, boks.htm, forord.htm, samm.htm, nb01.htm, nb02.htm, nb03.htm, nb04.htm, nb05.htm, nb06.htm, nb07.htm, nb08.htm, nb09.htm, nb10.htm, nb11.htm, nb12.htm, nb13.htm, nb.14.htm, tab00.htm, tab01.htm, tab02.htm, tab03.htm, tab04.htm, tab05.htm, tab06.htm, tab07.htm, tab08.htm, tab09.htm, tab10.htm, tab11.htm, tab12.htm, tab13.htm, tab14.htm, tab15.htm, tab16.htm, ren.htm, nat.css, ren.css, bagr2.gif, fors.gif, logo.gif, logo1.gif, luft2.gif, fig1.gif, fig2.gif, fig3.gif, fig4.gif, fig5.gif, fig6.gif, fig7.gif, fig8.gif, fig9.gif, fig10.gif, fig11.gif, fig12.gif, fig13.gif, fig14.gif, fig15.gif, fig16.gif, fig17.gif, fig18.gif, fig19.gif, fig20.gif, fig21.gif, fig22.gif, fig23.gif, fig24.gif, fig25.gif, fig26.gif, fig27.gif, fig28.gif, fig29.gif, fig30.gif, fig31.gif, fig32.gif, fig33.gif, fig34.gif, fig35.gif, fig36.gif, fig37.gif, fig38.gif, fig39.gif, fig40.gif, org.fig, s42.gif, sdot.gif, s71.jpg, s74.jpg, beret00_uk.pdf
Source ISBN:
Source ISSN: 1397-520x
Publ.Standard.Nr.: 2.0
The Report and Accounts are available on request from:
Danmarks Nationalbank, Information Desk, Havnegade 5, DK-1093 Copenhagen K
Telephone: +45 33 63 70 00 (direct) or +45 33 63 63 63
E-mail: info@nationalbanken.dk
Office hours:
Cashier services: Monday-Friday 10.00 a.m.-1.00 p.m.
Other inquiries: Monday-Friday 9.00 a.m.-4.00 p.m.
Explanation of Symbols
| - | Magnitude nil |
| 0 | Less than one half of unit employed |
| | Category not applicable |
| ... | Data not available |
| * | Provisional or estimated figures |
| Detail may not add because of rounding. | |

Chart 1 Gross domestic product, GDP
Chart 2 Contributions to growth
Chart 3 Nominal and real effective krone rates
Chart 4 The balance of payments
Chart 5 Change in domestic lending by banks and mortgage-credit institutes
Chart 6 Wage increases in Denmark and abroad
Chart 7 Increase in consumer prices and underlying inflation
Chart 8 Relative domestic demand and balance of payments
Chart 9 Official interest rates and 3-month money-market interest rate in Denmark
Chart 10 Interest-rate differential to the euro area
Chart 11 The krone rate and the Nationalbank's net purchase of foreign exchange
Chart 12 The banks' lending and deposit rates
Chart 13 The foreign-exchange reserve
Chart 14 Accounts of the banks and mortgage-credit institutes with the Nationalbank
Chart 15 Inflation in euro area
Chart 16 Growth in M3 and in credit to the private sector in the euro area
Chart 17 Official interest rates and money-market interest rates in the euro area
18 Bid amounts and allotment ratios in the ECB's main refinancing operations
Chart 19 Euro vis-à-vis dollar and yen
Chart 20 Swedish krona, Norwegian krone and pound sterling vis-a-vis euro
Chart 21 Changes in term structure in Germany and the USA
Chart 22 10-Year Government-bond yields
Chart 23 Danish bond market, term structure of zero-coupon rates
Chart 24 10-year government-bond yield differentials to Germany
Chart 25 Yield averages for new mortgage-credit bond issues
Chart 26 Stock indices, USA
Chart 27 Stock indices, Europe and Japan
Chart 28 Stock indice, Nordic countries
Chart 29 Early redemptions of mortgage-credit bonds and bond yields
Chart 30 Ownership of circulating krone-denominated bonds, end-2000
Chart 31 Groups and conglomerates' share of total balance sheet
Chart 32 Assets of the investment associations
Chart 33 Circulation of individual banknotes
Chart 34 Remaining proportion of series 1972 in circulation
Chart 35 Number of counterfeit banknotes
Chart 36 Counterfeit banknotes found in circulation 2000, international comparision
Chart 37 Staff groups
Chart 38 Seniority
Chart 39 Distribution by age and gender
Chart 40 Average course expenditure per employee
Table 1 Key figures for the Danish economy
Table 2 The Danish labour market
Table 3 Changes in the lending rate from 23 August to 27 September 2000
Table 4 Changes in the lending rate from 29 September 2000 to end-February 2001
Table 5 Capital flows
Table 6 Outstanding volumes of domestic krone-denominated bonds (nominal value)
Table 7 Krone payment systems
Table 8 Transaction volumes in TARGET and DEBES
Table 9 Staff groups
Table 10 Interest-rate sensitivity of the Nationalbank
Table 11 Foreign-exchange exposure of the Nationalbank
Table 12 The Nationalbank's Value-at-Risk
Table 13 Total credit exposure on the foreign-exchange reserve and the domestic securites portfolio, etc., end 2000
Box 1 The two pillars of the monetary-policy strategy
Box 2 The ECB's monetary-policy framework
Box 3 Reduced government financing requirements
Box 4 The impact of interest-rate guarantees on long-term interest rates
Box 5 The new capital-adequacy rules
Box 6 Commemorative coins to mark the 60th birthday of Queen Margrethe II
Box 7 Propose national sides of Danish Euro coins
Box 8 The organisation of the ECB
Box 9 The IMF's financing facilities
Box 10 The Board of Directors of Danmarks Nationalbank, 1 March 2001
Box 11 The Committee of Directors of Danmarks Nationalbank, 1 March 2001
Danmarks Nationalbank is the central bank of Denmark. Danmarks Nationalbank was established in 1818 and has been a self-governing institution since 1936. The legal basis for the Nationalbank's activities is the Nationalbank Act of 1936, according to which the Nationalbank's objective is to maintain a safe and secure currency system in Denmark, and to facilitate and regulate the traffic in money and the extension of credit. In its formulation of monetary policy the Nationalbank is independent of the Folketing (Parliament) and the Government.
In March 2000 it was announced that a referendum would be held on Denmark's adoption of the euro. For more than 10 years Danmarks Nationalbank has been involved in issues related to the Economic and Monetary Union. The Nationalbank has stated during this period that Denmark's adoption of a common currency would secure the framework for a stability-oriented economic policy. At the same time, by relinquishing its formal authority, Denmark would achieve real influence on the monetary policy which in any case is so vital to Denmark.
The outcome of the referendum was a rejection of Denmark's adoption of the euro. Since then, the Nationalbank has emphasised that the fixed-exchange-rate policy is to continue unchanged within the framework of ERM II.
The Report and Accounts of Danmarks Nationalbank comprise a presentation and description of the bank's Accounts for the year 2000, and the Report of the Board of Governors. The Report of the Board of Governors presents recent trends in the Danish economy, the monetary and foreign-exchange-rate policy, the monetary policy of the European Central Bank, and the development in financial and foreign-exchange markets, as well as a review of international monetary cooperation, together with the bank's other areas of operation and its organisation.
In the Monetary Reviews the Nationalbank publishes articles on recent trends in a number of areas including the Danish economy, monetary policy, financial conditions, statistics, banknotes and coins, payment systems and Economic and Monetary Union.
The outcome of the referendum held on 28 September 2000 was the rejection of Denmark's adoption of the single currency. The referendum, which was announced in March, affected the activities of Danmarks Nationalbank. Immediately after the referendum Denmark's Government and Danmarks Nationalbank stated in a joint press release that the fixed-exchange-rate policy would be maintained within the framework of the EU's exchange-rate system, ERM II.
As a consequence of the fixed-exchange-rate policy the interest rates of Danmarks Nationalbank are adjusted in step with those of the European Central Bank, ECB, with due consideration of the conditions in the foreign-exchange market. In 2000 Danmarks Nationalbank raised its interest rates on several occasions following interest-rate increases by the ECB. It was also necessary to widen the differential between the interest rates of the Nationalbank and the ECB since there was a certain outflow of foreign exchange and an underlying tendency for the krone to weaken in considerable periods of the year.
In the time up to the referendum short-term money-market interest rates rose significantly, but with no actual foreign-exchange unrest.
In order to avoid uncertainty concerning the krone rate after the referendum, the Nationalbank raised the lending rate by 0.5 per cent on 29 September. In the ensuing period the krone strengthened against the euro and the outflow of foreign exchange was reversed to an inflow. Moreover, interest-rate conditions in the Danish money market normalised. Against this background, the Nationalbank gradually lowered the lending rate, whereby the interest-rate differential to the euro area narrowed from 0.95 per cent at the end of September to approximately 0.55 per cent at the end of February, measured against the ECB's marginal interest rate.
A factor contributing to the krone's weakening in certain periods of 2000 was the large net purchases of foreign securities by resident investors. Even though the foreign-exchange market generally absorbed these considerable capital flows without significant problems, the Nationalbank had to sell foreign exchange for a net amount of kr. 38 billion in 2000, in order to dampen the fluctuations in the krone rate.
Long-term bond yields in Denmark fell in 2000, following the international trend for interest rates.
Up to the end of October 2000 the dollar strengthened further against the euro in view of the stronger economic growth in the USA than in the euro area. In the autumn the ECB, and in one instance also other central banks, intervened in the foreign-exchange market in support of the euro. In conjunction with the signs of a slowdown in the US economy, this strengthened the euro significantly at the end of the year. Nonetheless, the euro fell by 7 per cent against the dollar in the year overall.
The economic growth of Denmark's trading partners is estimated at 3.4 per cent in 2000. The upswing in the USA continued into the first half-year and growth in the euro area accelerated. Together with rising energy prices this entailed greater inflationary pressure and the tightening of monetary policy in the USA and the euro area. However, in view of the strong dampening of economic growth in the USA at the end of the year, American monetary policy was eased in January 2001.
Denmark's gross domestic product, GDP, is estimated to have risen by 2.5 per cent in 2000. Private consumption stagnated, while exports, and especially investments, rose.
The current-account surplus was kr. 19 billion, i.e. 1.5 per cent of GDP, and was thus maintained at the 1999 level. The weak development in private consumption helped to sustain the growth in exports. A good rate of growth in Europe and a declining effective krone rate also supported exports. The growth in imports must be considered in the light of the expansion of business investments.
After falling continually since 1994 unemployment levelled off in 2000. The rate of wage increase for the year as a whole was 3.7 per cent, which was below the rate of increase in 1999. However, wage increases in Denmark are still a little higher than in the euro area. An increasing supply of labour would make it easier to ensure a continuing expansion of activities and living standards without higher wage increases.
Inflation was 2.7 per cent in 2000, and thus higher than the inflation rate of 2.3 per cent in the euro area. Rising prices for energy, imports and public services contributed to overall inflation.
The fixed-exchange-rate policy also imposes certain requirements on fiscal policy. The labour market is tight and price and wage increases are a little higher than the price and wage-increase rates in the euro area. In view of the prospect of relatively strong growth in government consumption in 2001 there is no scope for further relaxation of fiscal policy in the next few years.
The banks' financial statements presented a sound surplus. Activity in the mortgage-credit sector dampened to a degree, due to such factors as a decrease in re-mortgaging activities. There was a large increase in the capital managed by the Investment associations.
In the spring of 2000 Danmarks Nationalbank entered into a cooperation agreement with Statistics Denmark and at the same time gained formal access to collate financial statistics as authorised by an amendment of the Act on Statistics Denmark. The Nationalbank was thereby given the responsibility to further develop the Danish financial statistics.
In April 2000 Danmarks Nationalbank issued a commemorative coin to mark the 60th birthday of Queen Margrethe II.
Had Denmark decided to adopt the euro, the Nationalbank would have been required to undertake extensive restructuring measures within a very short period. For this reason, prior to the referendum an internal EMU contingency plan was drawn up, identifying a number of projects, primarily related to IT, which the bank would be required to implement in the event of Denmark adopting the euro.
The Nationalbank's accounts for 2000 show a profit of kr. 5.7 billion, against kr. 1.5 billion in 1999. The improvement in profits is primarily related to positive value adjustments, in contrast to 1999, when this item was negative. In accordance with the customary practice for allocation of profits the value adjustments of kr. 1.3 billion are transferred to the Value Adjustment Reserve. An amount of kr. 1.3 billion, equivalent to 30 per cent of the profit for the year before value adjustments, is allocated to the General Reserves. The remainder of kr. 3.1 billion is payable to the central government.
The Danish economy took a stable course in 2000. Growth was attributable particularly to increasing investments, whereas private consumption remained unchanged. Unemployment has stabilised at a low level after falling continuously since 1994. Wage and price increases have approached the rates of the euro area. Both government finances and the balance of payments show a surplus.
Growth on Denmark's export markets is expected to dampen in 2001. The labour market is still tight and capacity utilisation high. In the short term it is crucial to avoid acceleration in wage increases, in order to maintain price stability and avoid compromising competitiveness. In the longer term, the principal challenge is to continue to bring down both the government debt and the external debt. The need for fiscal prudence is enhanced by the fixed-exchange-rate policy. There is thus no scope for further relaxation of fiscal policy in the coming years neither as increased government expenditure nor as unfinanced tax cuts.
Global economic growth is slowing down. Growth in the gross domestic product, GDP, of Denmark's trading partners is estimated to decrease from 3.4[1] per cent in 2000 to 2.6[2] per cent in 2001. In 2000 growth was strongest in the first six months. In contrast to previously the trend during the winter was for downward adjustment of the international growth forecasts for 2001, including a strong reduction of the expected rate of growth in the USA. As in 1999, oil prices rose in 2000, leading to some upward pressure on consumer prices. Long-term interest rates fell throughout 2000.
In 2000 the USA saw the highest growth rate since the beginning of the boom in 1992. Preliminary data releases indicate that GDP rose by 5 per cent. As in previous years the main contributing factor was private consumption, and savings continued to decline. The record-high current- account deficit is attributable to low savings combined with high investment. One result of the favourable cyclical course is a higher government surplus. Although inflation rose during 2000, the increase has so far been moderate in view of the strong growth and low unemployment rate. The moderate increase in inflation is related to the remarkably strong improvement in productivity. Productivity in the non-farm business sector increased by 4.3 per cent in 2000, compared to 2.7 and 2.6 per cent in 1998 and 1999 respectively.
At the close of the year a number of key indicators showed a significant slowdown in the US economy, as indicated by e.g. the strong decline in business and consumer confidence. Against this background, on 3 January and 31 January 2001 the Federal Reserve lowered its official short-term interest rate the federal funds target rate by a total of 1 per cent to 5.5 per cent.
Growth in Japan was only moderate, cf. Chart 1. The GDP growth estimate for 2000 is 1.9 per cent. The contributing factors were exports and business investments, whereas growth in private consumption was weak.
Chart 1 Gross domestic product, GDP
| Note: | Constant prices, seasonally adjusted. |
| Sources: | National statistics and own calculations. |
The strength of the current upswing in Japan is subject to considerable uncertainty and the business community continues to be burdened by a large number of failing businesses. Weaker global growth in the coming years, and thereby a lower rate of increase in exports, may dampen the upswing. The large number of economic measures taken by the Japanese government since 1992 have led to high government deficits and a surge in government debt. In 2000 Japan's government budget deficit was 6 per cent of GDP, while its government debt accounted for 112 per cent of GDP.
Growth accelerated in the euro area during 2000. The OECD estimates growth in GDP at 3.5 per cent, which is the strongest expansion of the economy since 1990. The main contributor was exports, supported by strong global demand and improved competitiveness resulting from the weakening of the euro against the dollar and other currencies up to the end of October. Domestic demand was driven by the private sector via higher private consumption and increased capital formation.
Euro-area inflation rose during 1999 and 2000, due mainly to increasing energy prices. The average rate of price increases in 2000 was 2.3 per cent. This exceeds the ECB's definition of price stability as a year-on-year increase in consumer prices of below 2 per cent. The oil price fell towards the end of the year, which led to a moderation of inflationary pressure at the beginning of 2001.
Euro-area unemployment has fallen steadily since the autumn of 1997. At the end of 2000 8.7 per cent of the labour force were unemployed. However, the individual rates of the member states vary considerably.
In recent years the government finances of the euro area as a whole have improved significantly. The small government budget surplus in 2000 is attributable to such factors as extraordinary revenue from the sale of UMTS licences[3]. The euro area taken as one had a small current-account deficit.
Towards the end of the year a number of key indicators showed that growth would dampen in the coming year, although the slowdown will probably be less pronounced than in the USA. Business and consumer confidence were high, and fiscal policy is relaxed after tax cuts in e.g. Germany, France and Italy in 2001.
Preliminary data show growth in GDP of 3 per cent in the UK in 2000. Growth is still driven mainly by private consumption. Inflation is low, even though the labour market is tight.
The upswing in Sweden continued in 2000 and preliminary data indicate GDP growth of 4 per cent, to which both domestic demand and exports contributed. Inflation has been rising, but is still low.
In Norway growth in GDP was 2.2 per cent in 2000, following low growth in 1999. Exports and private consumption were the main factors driving growth. Unemployment is very low, and inflation is high.
The structure of growth in the Danish economy has changed, becoming more balanced in recent years, cf. Chart 2. After some years of rising private consumption, the expansion of domestic demand, and thereby imports, dampened in 1999, and exports showed a significant improvement. Growth increased somewhat in 2000, and is estimated at 2.5 per cent, against 2.1 per cent in 1999, cf. Table 1. The growth can be attributed to higher investment, comprising both housing and business investments, primarily due to the large-scale repairs required after the hurricane in Denmark in December 1999. Part of the expansion of business investments is related to higher capacity utilisation during the year, primarily due to the improvement in exports.
Chart 2 Contributions to growth
| Note: | Private investments comprise business and residential investments. Estimates for 2000. |
| Sources: | Statistics Denmark and own calculations. |
Table 1 Key figures for the Danish Economy
| Real growth against the previous year, per cent | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 20001 |
| Private consumption | 2.5 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Government demand | 3.8 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| Business investments | 2.7 | 13.7 | 10.3 | 1.6 | 12.0 |
| Residential investments | 5.8 | 7.1 | 4.5 | 2.1 | 10.9 |
| Domestic demand, excluding | |||||
| stockbuilding | 3.0 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 2.7 |
| Stockbuilding2 | -0.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | -1.6 | 0.0 |
| Domestic demand, total | 2.2 | 4.9 | 4.5 | -0.6 | 2.7 |
| Exports | 4.3 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Imports | 3.5 | 10.0 | 7.4 | 2,2 | 9.5 |
| Net exports2 | 0.4 | -1.7 | -1.7 | 2.8 | 0.0 |
| Gross domestic product, GDP | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 2.5 |
| Unemployment, per cent of the labour force | 8.9 | 7.9 | 6.6 | 5.7 | 5.4 |
| Consumer-price index3, percentage growth | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Current account, per cent of GDP | 1.7 | 0.4 | -0.8 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| Government balance, per cent of GDP | -1.0 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 2.6 |
| Private savings surplus4, per cent of GDP | 2.7 | 0.1 | -1.9 | -1.4 | -1.1 |
| Source: | Statistics Denmark. |
| 1 | Partial estimate, based on provisional statistics from Statistics Denmark. |
| 2 | Contribution to growth in GDP at constant prices. |
| 3 | The Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP). |
| 4 | Current-account surplus plus general-government budget deficit. |
The pronounced slowdown in private consumption in 1999 continued into 2000. In the first half of 2000 private consumption even declined, but then increased moderately. Overall, private consumption made no contribution to growth in 2000. The dampening of private consumption is related to weak development in the households' real disposable income, as well as a strong decrease in car sales in reaction to the high sales in the previous years. Moreover, the savings ratio increased in 2000, attributable to the incentives in the Whitsun package of 1998. As a result of the strong growth in private investment the private sector continued to show a savings deficit, amounting to 1.1 per cent of GDP in 2000.
Besides stimulating private savings the Whitsun package also aimed at dampening the rate of increase in property prices. According to the Association of Danish Mortgage Banks prices rose at a lower rate in 2000, although house prices are still rising more quickly than prices for consumer goods. However, the number of property sales has declined, and in this respect the housing market has dampened.
Total government demand, i.e. government consumption and investment, rose by 1 per cent in 2000. Preliminary statistics indicate a slightly contractive fiscal policy, with a fiscal effect of 0.1 per cent of GDP. The overall economic policy, including the structural effects of the Whitsun package, is estimated to have dampened economic activity by 0.6 per cent of GDP in 2000.
The monetary conditions are still expansionary. Long-term interest rates have fallen, while the effective krone rate weakened in both nominal and real terms during the year, cf. Chart 3. Short-term interest rates have risen, however. As a consequence of the fixed-exchange-rate policy vis-à-vis the euro the weaker effective krone rate reflects the strengthening of the dollar and the yen against the euro up to October when the nominal effective krone rate reached its lowest level. At the end of the year the nominal effective krone rate was 1.7 per cent lower than at end-1999. Expansionary monetary conditions underline the need for a tight fiscal-policy stance.
Chart 3 Nominal and real effective krone rates
| Note: | The real effective krone rate based on hourly earnings in manufacturing industry. The real effective krone rate denotes the trend for Danish wages compared to abroad in a common currency. For the real effective krone rate partial estimate for 4th quarter 2000. |
| Sources: | Statistics Denmark, OECD and own calculations. |
Total employment rose by around 22,000 in 2000, which approximately corresponds to the increase in 1999, cf. Table 2. Employment in the private sector (including the self-employed) rose by 21,000, while employment in the public sector rose by 1,000.
Table 2 The Danish labour market
| 1,000 persons, annual average | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 20001 |
| Wage and salary earners | ||||
| Private sector | 1,606 | 1,634 | 1,657 | 1,680 |
| Public sector | 795 | 809 | 812 | 813 |
| Self-employed | 206 | 200 | 197 | 195 |
| Total employment | 2,607 | 2,643 | 2,666 | 2,688 |
| Unemployed | 220 | 183 | 158 | 151 |
| Labour force | 2,827 | 2,826 | 2,824 | 2,839 |
| Recipients of early retirement benefit2 | 170 | 176 | 179 | 179 |
| Recipients of leave benefits | 46 | 41 | 33 | 25 |
| Unemployment, per cent of the labour force | 7.9 | 6.6 | 5.7 | 5.4 |
| Unemployment, EU definition, | ||||
| per cent of the labour force3 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 4.7 |
| Sources: | Statistics Denmark, the Directorate General for Employment Placement and Vocational Training and own calculations. |
| 1 | Partial estimate, based on provisional statistics. |
| 2 | Including recipients of transitional allowance. |
| 3 | Eurostat method. |
After falling continuously since 1994 the unemployment rate levelled off in 2000, and has been almost unchanged since April 2000. At the close of the year 5.4 per cent of the labour force were unemployed. According to the Eurostat definition, the unemployment rate was 4.7 per cent.[4]
In contrast to the preceding years, the labour force expanded in 2000. An increasing supply of labour would make it easier to ensure a continuing expansion of activities and living standards without higher wage increases. In 2000 employment rose slightly less than activity, entailing a moderate increase in productivity.
The current-account surplus in 2000 was kr. 19 billion, corresponding to 1.5 per cent of GDP. The surplus of 1999 was thus maintained. Stagnating private consumption allowed growth in exports to continue. Exports were further stimulated by a good rate of growth in Europe, and a decrease in the effective krone rate. Growth in imports accelerated in 2000 against the background of the increase in business investments. In overall terms, the balance of goods has improved by kr. 4 billion against 1999, and the balance of services by approximately kr. 9 billion, cf. Chart 4. Interest and transfers, etc. have deteriorated by kr. 15 billion since December 1999.
Chart 4 The balance of payments
| Note: | 12-month moving average. |
| Source: | Statistics Denmark. |
Despite the benefit from improved competitiveness caused by the decline in the effective krone rate, a net gain in market share was not achieved in 2000 as in 1999. The reason may be the high capital utilisation in many sectors of manufacturing after the rise in manufactured exports in 1999, and the lack of scope for further expansion of production capacity in the short term. In the longer term there is a clear relation between competitiveness and market shares. It is therefore important that wage increases in Denmark do not exceed wage increases in the euro area.
The current-account surplus in 2000 made a positive contribution to reduction of Denmark's external debt. However, the external debt is also affected by value adjustment of assets and liabilities (shares and bonds). A provisional estimate of Denmark's external debt at end-2000 is published at the end of March 2001.
After several years of decrease in private savings, this trend was reversed in 1999. The private sector's savings deficit was reduced a little further in 2000. This trend is reflected in lending by banks and mortgage-credit institutes, but the rate of increase is still high, cf. Chart 5. The rate of increase in lending to the business sector has been higher than the rate of increase in lending to the non-business sector. This is related to such factors as the strong growth in investments and the moderate growth in private consumption.
Chart 5 Change in domestic lending by banks and mortgage-credit institutes
| Note: | Lending denominated in both kroner and foreign exchange. Adjusted for losses and provisions. Non-business includes the self-employed. |
At end-2000 mortgage-credit loans at adjustable interest rates accounted for around kr. 100 billion, corresponding to 9 per cent of total mortgage-credit lending, against 6 per cent in 1999. Variable-interest loans were raised particularly at the beginning of the year. The yield curve has made it relatively less attractive to raise loans at adjustable interest rates.
At end-2000 euro-denominated lending by the mortgage-credit institutes was kr. 6 billion higher than in 1999 and accounted for kr. 16 billion of the total lending of kr. 1,095 billion.
The trend followed by borrowing in 2000 was not reflected in the monetary aggregate M3. The money stock, which consists of the deposits with the banks from private individuals, business enterprises and local governments, together with their holdings of banknotes and coins, was unchanged. The money stock has thus not increased by the transaction requirement measured as the value of domestic demand.
After declining in the first half-year the rate of wage increase registered by the Danish Employers' Confederation rose in most sectors in the second half-year. The rate of wage increase for the year as a whole was 3.7 per cent, which was below the rate of increase in 1999.
Wages are still increasing faster in Denmark than in the euro area, although the rates have tended to converge since the beginning of 1999, cf. Chart 6. As the labour market remains tight there is a risk that the rate of wage increase in Denmark will begin to rise again.
Chart 6 Wage increases in Denmark and abroad
| Note: | Abroad, total is the countries included in the effective krone rate index. The wage increases are weighted together using the weights of the index. Wage increases are wage increases in the manufacturing sector. |
| Sources: | Statistics Denmark, OECD and own calculations. |
Measured in HICP terms, inflation in Denmark was 2.7 per cent in 2000, against 2.1 per cent in 1999. Inflation was on average higher in Denmark than in the euro area, even though the inflation differential was eliminated during the year. Inflation was sustained by strong price trends for energy, imported goods and public services. On the other hand, underlying inflation, which is a measure of the domestic market-determined price increases, was low throughout 2000, cf. Chart 7. This was primarily a result of weak growth in profit margins, since increases in import prices were not passed on to consumers.
Chart 7 Increase in consumer prices and underlying inflation
| Note: | Underlying inflation has an overweight of services. |
| Sources: | Statistics Denmark and own calculations. |
At the beginning of 2001 there are no acute imbalances in the Danish economy. The growth in 1999 and 2000 was driven by the strong upturn in the global economy, while domestic-market activity was moderate. Domestic demand thus rose less in Denmark than abroad, which benefited the balance of payments, cf. Chart 8.
Chart 8 Relative domestic demand and balance of payments
| Note: | The balance of payments is a 4-quarter moving average. Domestic demand abroad is weighted together using the weights of the effective krone rate index. Partial estimate for 4th quarter 2000. |
| Sources: | Statistics Denmark, OECD and own calculations. |
An important risk factor in the short term is the dampening of growth abroad, especially in the USA. In conjunction with the increase in the effective krone rate since October 2000 this may make it difficult to sustain growth in exports and thereby the considerable current-account surplus. Price and wage trends must be compatible with price stability if competitiveness is to be maintained. The labour market is still tight and capacity utilisation high, so there is still a risk of upward pressure on wages. The government sector should avoid contributing to further wage pressure via higher employment than planned, or via the derived effects on activity of strong increases in government expenditure.
It is necessary to maintain a current-account surplus and a budget surplus in order to continue the reduction of the external debt and the government debt. The need for fiscal prudence is enhanced by the fixed-exchange-rate policy. Real growth in government consumption in 2001 is estimated to be a good deal stronger than the government's medium-term objective of an annual increase of 1 per cent. There is thus no scope for further relaxation of fiscal policy in the coming years neither as increased government expenditure nor as unfinanced tax cuts.
[1] The OECD's autumn forecast, Economic Outlook No. 68, November 2000.
[2] Consensus forecast published by Consensus Economics Inc.
[3] UMTS (Universal Mobile Telephone System) licences are the sale of transmission licences for third-generation mobile telephony.
[4] Eurostat is the statistical body of the European Commission.
The fixed-exchange-rate policy remains unchanged after Denmark's rejection of the euro by referendum on 28 September 2000.
The policy entails that Danmarks Nationalbank's interest rates are fixed in accordance with the interest rates of the European Central Bank, ECB, and the conditions in the foreign-exchange market. In 2000 Danmarks Nationalbank raised its interest rates on several occasions following interest-rate increases by the ECB. It was also necessary to widen the differential between the official interest rates of the Nationalbank and the ECB since there was some outflow of foreign exchange and underlying trends for the krone to weaken in considerable periods of the year. In the time up to the referendum short-term market interest rates rose significantly, but with no real foreign-exchange unrest. The large net purchases of foreign securities by resident investors contributed to the krone's weakening in certain periods of 2000. Even though the foreign-exchange market generally absorbed these considerable capital flows without significant problems, the Nationalbank had to sell foreign exchange for a net amount of kr. 38 billion in 2000, in order to dampen the fluctuations in the krone rate.
The objective of Denmark's fixed-exchange-rate policy is to keep the krone stable against the euro. In view of the primary objective of monetary policy in the euro area to maintain price stability the linking of the krone to the euro creates a framework for price stability in Denmark.
The formal framework for Denmark's fixed-exchange-rate policy is its participation in the exchange-rate mechanism, ERM II. The purpose of ERM II is to ensure stable exchange rates between the euro area and the EU member states which have not introduced the single currency. Denmark participates in ERM II with a central rate of kr. 746.038 per 100 euro and a fluctuation band of +/- 2.25 per cent. In recent years the Nationalbank has maintained a stable krone rate close to the central rate. Underlying trends for the krone to fluctuate are dampened by buying or selling foreign exchange, or by adjusting interest rates.
The fixed-exchange-rate policy is unchanged after Denmark's rejection of the euro by referendum on 28 September 2000. This was confirmed by the Danish Government and the Nationalbank in a joint press release after the referendum. In its opening statement to the Folketing (Parliament) on 3 October 2000 the government emphasised that it will not hesitate to tighten fiscal policy in order to sustain the fixed-exchange-rate policy.
The fixed-exchange-rate policy entails a clear dividing line between monetary and fiscal policy in Denmark. Monetary policy is designed to support the fixed-exchange-rate policy. In practice, this means that the Nationalbank's interest rates are fixed in accordance with the ECB's interest rates and conditions in the foreign-exchange market. It is the task of fiscal policy and other economic policy to ensure a balanced economic course and price stability in line with the ECB's objective, and thereby support the fixed-exchange-rate policy.
At the beginning of 2000 the discount rate and the Nationalbank's current-account rate were 3 per cent, while the interest rate for certificates of deposit and the Nationalbank's lending rate were 3.30 per cent, cf. Chart 9.[1] The spread between the lending rate and the ECB's main refinancing rate was 0.30 per cent, while the differential between 3-month money market interest rates in Denmark and the euro area was 0.35-0.40 per cent, cf. Chart 10.
Chart 9 Official interest rates and 3-month money-market interest rate in Denmark
Chart 10 Interest-rate differential to the euro area
| Note: | The interest-rate differential for official lending rates is the difference between the Nationalbank's lending rate and the rate of interest for the ECB's main refinancing operations. As from 28 June 2000 the marginal interest rate for the ECB's main refinancing operations is used. |
The Nationalbank closely matches the ECB's interest-rate adjustments. On three occasions, with effect from 4 February, 17 March and 28 April, the discount rate was raised by a total of 0.75 per cent to 3.75 per cent after equivalent interest-rate increases by the ECB. With effect from 4 February the lending rate was raised by 0.30 per cent.
On the other two occasions the lending rate was raised by 0.25 per cent to a total of 4.10 per cent. In these months the krone continued its slight weakening against the euro which began in the 2nd half of 1999, cf. Chart 11. One factor behind the underlying tendency for the krone to weaken in this period was considerable portfolio restructuring in favour of foreign securities by major Danish investors. In January and February 2000 the Nationalbank sold foreign exchange for approximately kr. 19 billion, in order to dampen the fluctuations in the krone rate. However, from March to May the outflow of foreign exchange was subdued, and the differential between money-market interest rates in Denmark and the euro area was relatively stable for the entire period.
Chart 11 The krone rate and the Nationalbank's net purchase of foreign exchange
| Note: | Weekly observations. The fluctuation limits in ERM II are respectively kr. 729.252 and 762.824 per 100 euro. |
With effect from 9 June the Nationalbank raised the discount rate by 0.5 per cent to 4.25 per cent after the ECB raised its interest rates. The lending rate was raised by 0.60 per cent to 4.70 per cent, which widened the spread to the ECB's main refinancing rate by 0.10 per cent to 0.45 per cent. The widening was due to a considerable outflow of foreign exchange at the end of May and beginning of June when the krone weakened to below the central rate after several opinion polls had shown that support for Denmark's joining the euro was diminishing. This decline in support for the euro contributed to widening the differential between money-market interest rates in Denmark and the euro area. From the beginning of June to mid-July the differential widened by almost 1 per cent to just below 1.4 per cent. However, part of this widening was reversed in the period from mid-July to the end of August.
The Nationalbank's monetary policy in the summer of 2000 was complicated by the ECB's adoption at the end of June of a variable-rate tender procedure for allotment of liquidity in the main refinancing operations, instead of a fixed-rate tender procedure. The ECB's new tender procedures meant that the Nationalbank had to adapt its practice for adjustments of interest rates in response to the ECB's interest-rate adjustments. In stable foreign-exchange conditions, the discount rate will now be adjusted in accordance with the ECB's minimum bid rate, while the lending rate will be adjusted on the basis of the marginal interest rate for the ECB's main refinancing operations. Minor fluctuations in the marginal interest rate will not normally entail adjustments of the lending rate, but will instead lead to minor fluctuations in the interest-rate differential. For a period after the ECB's adoption of the variable-rate tender procedure the Nationalbank as an extraordinary measure announced adjustments of the lending rate in press releases. The purpose was to emphasise that the adjustments were due solely to fluctuations in the marginal interest rate, and not to any change in conditions on the foreign-exchange market. Since then, the Nationalbank has resumed its normal practice of only issuing press releases if the discount rate is adjusted[2].
In the period from 23 August to 27 September the Nationalbank adjusted the lending rate on several occasions as a consequence of fluctuations in the marginal interest rate for the ECB's main refinancing operations, cf. Table 3. In addition, the discount rate was raised by 0.25 per cent to 4.50 per cent with effect from 1 September after an equivalent raising of the ECB's minimum bid rate.
Table 3 Changes in the lending rate from 23 august to 27
september 2000
| Per cent | Changes | Lending rate | ECB's marginal interest rate |
Interest-rate differential |
| 23 August | +0.2 | 4.90 | 4.47 | 0.43 |
| 30 August | +0.2 | 5.10 | 4.68 | 0.42 |
| 6 September | -0.1 | 5.00 | 4.55 | 0.45 |
| 27 September | +0.1 | 5.10 | 4.65 | 0.45 |
| Note: | The ECB raised the minimum bid rate by 0.25 per cent from 4.25 per cent to 4.50 per cent with effect from 1 September. The marginal interest rate is fixed at the weekly tenders. |
In the period just before the referendum the krone weakened again to below the central rate, but with no actual foreign-exchange unrest. For a short period the differential between money-market interest rates in Denmark and the euro area widened to just above 2 per cent, and the spread between the 3-month money-market interest rate in Denmark and the Nationalbank's lending rate widened to almost 2 per cent. The money market's reaction reflected the market participants' expectations of interest-rate increases in response to pressure on the krone rate. Although the short-term market rates began to fall in the 2nd half of September, the 3-month interest rate remained significantly higher than the Nationalbank's interest rates. In September the Nationalbank sold foreign exchange for approximately kr. 11 billion in order to dampen the fluctuations in the krone.
After the referendum the Nationalbank raised the lending rate by 0.50 per cent to 5.60 with effect from 29 September. As a result the interest-rate differential to the marginal interest rate for the ECB's main refinancing operations widened to 0.95 per cent. The purpose of the raising of interest rates was to prevent uncertainty concerning the krone after the referendum. During the following period the krone strengthened against the euro, and the outflow of foreign exchange was reversed to an inflow as the Nationalbank purchased foreign exchange for almost kr. 17 billion in October. Furthermore, interest-rate conditions in the Danish money market returned to normal and the spread between money-market interest rates in Denmark and the euro area narrowed to the level of the beginning of the year.
With effect from 6 October the Nationalbank raised the discount rate by 0.25 per cent to 4.75 per cent after an equivalent raising of the ECB's minimum bid rate. The lending rate was maintained unchanged in view of the krone's strengthening. As the marginal interest rate for the ECB's main refinancing operations at the same time rose by almost 0.10 per cent the spread between the Nationalbank's lending rate and the marginal interest rate narrowed to approximately 0.85 per cent.
From 13 October 2000 up to the end of February 2001 the Nationalbank gradually lowered the lending rate by a total of 0.30 per cent, cf. Table 4. As the marginal interest rate for the ECB's main refinancing operations was stable in that period, the interest-rate differential narrowed to approximately 0.55 per cent, i.e. approximately 0.25 per cent above the level of the beginning of 2000.
Table 4 Changes in the lending rate from 29 September 2000
toend-February 2001
| Per cent | Changes | Lending rate | ECB's marginal interest rate |
Interest-rate differential |
| 29 September 2000 | +0.5 | 5.60 | 4.65 | 0.95 |
| 13 October 2000 | -0.1 | 5.50 | 4.76 | 0.74 |
| 27 October 2000 | -0.1 | 5.40 | 4.80 | 0.60 |
| 9 February 2001 | -0.1 | 5.30 | 4.75 | 0.55 |
| Note: | The ECB raised the minimum bid rate by 0.25 per cent from 4.50 per cent to 4.75 per cent with effect from 1 September. The marginal interest rate is fixed at the weekly tenders. |
Around the turn of the year 2000/2001 the krone rate moved to slightly below the central rate, and the differential between 3-month money market interest rates in Denmark and the euro area widened slightly to 0.50-0.60 per cent. The small underlying trend for the krone to weaken at the beginning of 2001 was partly due to Danish investors' purchases of foreign securities. However, the outflow of foreign exchange was significantly less than in the first months of 2000.
The banks' interest rates
The banks' average lending and deposit rates have matched the development in the Nationalbank's discount rate, cf.
Chart 12. From the 4th quarter of 1999 to the 3rd quarter of 2000 the lending and deposit rates rose by respectively
1.2 per cent and 1.0 per cent. Interest-rate statistics for the 4th quarter of 2000 have not yet been released. The
interest margin has increased slightly since the 1st quarter of 1999, after declining in the preceding years.
Chart 12 The banks' lending and deposit rates
| Note: | Quarterly averages. |
The surplus on the current account of the balance of payments is estimated to have been around kr. 19 billion in 2000, cf. Table 5. Private capital flows led to net capital exports of an estimated kr. 57 billion. In 2000 the Nationalbank had to sell foreign exchange for kr. 37.7 billion, which could be attributed partly to the considerable net capital exports. In 2000 the central government repaid foreign loans for kr. 5.2 billion. The foreign-exchange reserve excluding value adjustments decreased by kr. 43.0 billion, cf. Chart 13.
Table 5 Capital flows
| Net receipts, kr. billion | 1999 | 2000 |
| Current account of the balance of payments | 21 | 19 |
| Capital transfers | 7 | 0 |
| Capital inflows: | ||
| Direct investments | -8 | 52 |
| Portfolio investments1 | -24 | -153 |
| Of which foreign securities | -68 | -191 |
| Financial derivatives | 2 | 6 |
| Lending and deposits2 | 87 | 68 |
| Estimate of unrecorded commercial credits3 | -12 | 17 |
| Errors and omissions | -10 | -46 |
| The Nationalbank's net purchase of foreign exchange | 63 | -38 |
| Used as follows: | ||
| To reduce the central government's external debt | -1 | 5 |
| To increase the foreign-exchange reserve | 64 | -43 |
| Note: | Excluding value adjustments, etc. |
| 1 | Excluding the central government's foreign bond issues. |
| 2 | Excluding the central government's foreign bank loans. |
| 3 | Compensation for the hurricane in December 1999 is included as capital outflows in 1999 and as capital inflows in 2000. |
Chart 13 The foreign-exchange reserve
| Note: | End of month. |
Portfolio investments in 2000 resulted in net capital exports of kr. 153 billion. For the year as a whole net purchases of foreign securities by residents amounted to kr. 191 billion, of which equity securities accounted for kr. 110 billion. In 2000 non-residents' net purchases of Danish securities (krone-denominated bonds, bonds denominated in foreign exchange and Danish equity securities) totalled kr. 32 billion. The merger of Unidanmark and the Finnish/Swedish MeritaNordbanken[3] group accounts for kr. 30.9 billion of residents' net purchases of foreign securities.
In recent years residents' net purchases of foreign securities have increased strongly. The increase in net purchases of foreign securities in 2000 can be attributed to such factors as extensive portfolio restructuring in favour of foreign securities by Danish institutional investors. In the foreign-exchange market investors' net purchases of foreign securities will normally increase the demand for foreign exchange and the supply of Danish kroner. The considerable net purchases of foreign securities have thus contributed to the underlying tendency for the krone to weaken in considerable periods of 2000.
The Nationalbank's monetary-policy counterparties are banks and mortgage-credit institutes in Denmark. The net position of the monetary-policy counterparties, i.e. their net claims on the Nationalbank, is influenced by various factors. Viewed over a longer period the Nationalbank's net purchases of foreign exchange are the main factor contributing to changes in the net position. When the Nationalbank purchases foreign exchange and sells kroner, viewed in isolation the net position is increased, and vice versa. The considerable net sales of foreign exchange by the Nationalbank up to and including September 2000 led to a gradual decrease in the net position, cf. Chart 14. The Nationalbank's extensive purchases of foreign exchange in October brought this decline to an end, and during the last months of the year the net position rose a little.
Chart 14 Accounts of the banks and mortgage-credit institutes with the Nationalbank
| Note: | The mortgage-credit institutes are included as from 21 June 1999. |
Central-government receipts and disbursements
For the year as a whole, the central government's domestic krone- denominated borrowing covers the gross domestic
financing requirement, i.e. the central government's current deficit and redemptions of the domestic debt. Within the
same year, however, central-government receipts and disbursements may entail major fluctuations in the net position.
The Nationalbank prepares monthly and daily forecasts of central-government receipts and disbursements. These
forecasts are used by the monetary-policy counterparties in the management of their own liquidity, and by the
Nationalbank as an element of the management of overall liquidity. The forecasts are prepared on the basis of the
budget reviews of the Ministry of Finance and the Nationalbank's knowledge of central-government receipts and
disbursements.
For a number of years the Nationalbank and private banks have handled various types of central-government receipts and disbursements, e.g. payments between the central government and local governments, tax payments and disbursements of social benefits. However, in 1999 the Ministry of Finance decided to gather all central-government receipts and disbursements in one system, SKB (Statens KoncernBetalingssystem). After a public procurement procedure the design of the system was awarded to Jyske Bank, and the system is now being established. After the introduction of SKB the central government's liquidity will still be held in an account with the Nationalbank. The gathering of central-government receipts and disbursement in one system is expected to improve the basis for the Nationalbank's forecasts of central-government receipts and disbursements.
The Nationalbank's monetary-policy counterparties have access to place liquidity as overnight deposits (current-account deposits) with the Nationalbank and to participate in the Nationalbank's weekly market operations. Via the weekly market operations the counterparties may raise 14-day loans against collateral (the Nationalbank supplies liquidity) and/or place funds by purchasing 14-day certificates of deposit (the Nationalbank absorbs liquidity). The rate of interest for these instruments is a central element of monetary policy. Current-account deposits with the Nationalbank accrue interest at the current-account rate, which is identical to the discount rate. The Nationalbank's 14-day loans and certificates of deposit are subject to the lending rate and the rate of interest for certificates of deposit, respectively. These are also identical and higher than the discount rate.
The net position of the monetary-policy counterparties consists of their holdings of certificates of deposit and current-account deposits, less their 14-day loans from the Nationalbank. In the weekly market operations the monetary-policy counterparties will normally ensure a net position whereby the total current-account deposit covers the expected liquidity requirement in the coming week. In the event of major known fluctuations in the liquidity requirement, e.g. in the light of major central-government receipts or disbursements, the Nationalbank may pre-announce its intention to repurchase or sell certificates of deposit outside the weekly market operations. Furthermore, the Nationalbank may also provide access for repurchase or sale of certificates of deposit without pre-announcement in the event of major unforeseen fluctuations in the liquidity requirement.
Since 2000 the current-account deposits with the Nationalbank of monetary-policy counterparties have been subject to certain limits[4]. The limits are intended to prevent the accumulation of large current-account deposits which might be used for speculation in changes in interest rates and/or exchange rates. The total limit for current accounts is almost kr. 20 billion. If the total limit for all counterparties taken as one is exceeded the current-account deposits exceeding the individual limits will be converted to certificates of deposit. For a certain period around the referendum the current-account deposits of the monetary-policy counterparties were close to the overall ceiling, but it has still not been necessary to convert current- account deposits to certificates of deposit. Towards the end of the year the Nationalbank made a minor adjustment to the individual current-account limits in view of the development in the financial sector and the counterparties' utilisation of the current-account limits. The overall ceiling for current accounts remained unchanged. The revised current-account limits have been in force since 1 January 2001 and are listed at www.nationalbanken.dk under Monetary policy.
[1] The rate of interest on the monetary-policy counterparties' current accounts corresponds to the discount rate, and the rate of interest for certificates of deposit corresponds to the lending rate, which is higher than the discount rate.
[2] Adjustments of the rate of interest for certificates of deposit and the lending rate are announced via the Nationalbank's electronic information system. See also the Nationalbank's interest rates on www.nationalbanken.dk under Markets.
[3] The merger is also registered in the statistics as a direct investment in Denmark (capital imports) of kr. 42.5 billion, and a repurchase of Danish shares for kr. 11.5 billion (capital exports under portfolio investments). Excluding the merger between Unidanmark and MeritaNordbanken the year's net capital imports from direct investments amounted to kr. 10 billion.
[4] The limits were introduced in June 1999 in connection with a number of mainly technical adjustments to the range of monetary-policy instruments. These adjustments are described in the Monetary Review, 2nd Quarter 1999, p. 15.
The primary monetary-policy objective of the European Central Bank, ECB, is to maintain price stability in the euro area. The ECB's monetary policy is therefore based on three main elements: a quantitative definition of price stability, and two pillars for analysis of data as the basis for the monetary-policy decisions.
In 2000 the ECB raised its official interest rates by a total of 1.75 per cent in order to prevent future inflation as a consequence of stronger economic growth and oil-price rises. In the autumn of 2000 the ECB, and in one instance also other central banks, intervened in the foreign-exchange market in support of the euro. The background was concern about the global and domestic consequences of the falling euro rate against the dollar and the yen, including the risk of price increases in the euro area.
Under the Maastricht Treaty the primary objective of the ECB is to maintain price stability in the euro area. The ECB has defined price stability as a year-on-year increase in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices, HICP, for the euro area of below 2 per cent. The ECB's monetary policy has a medium-term orientation. The ECB's mandate entails that monetary policy may support the growth potential of the euro area unless this is incompatible with the primary objective of price stability.
The monetary-policy strategy is based on two pillars which together form the basis for the monetary-policy decisions, cf. Box 1. The pillars indicate the key factors in the assessment of price developments.
Box 1 The two pillars of the monetary-policy strategy
| Source: | ECB Monthly Bulletin, November 2000. |
The first pillar
The first pillar comprises an analysis assigning a prominent role to money. The prominent role of money is signalled by
the announcement of a reference value for growth in the broad monetary aggregate, M3. M3 consists of deposits with
credit institutions from private citizens and business enterprises, etc., as well as their holdings of currency in circulation
and negotiable instruments issued by monetary financial institutions.
The reference value is derived from the relationship between money, real income, prices and the velocity of money. The correlation is as follows in terms of changes:
Dm/m = Dy/y + Dp/p - Dv/v,
where Dm/m is the percentage growth in money, Dy/y is the growth in real income, Dp/p is inflation and Dv/v is the percentage increase in the velocity of money.
The first reference value was announced in December 1998 as a year-on-year rate of growth of 4½ per cent. This reference value was derived on the basis of medium-term assumptions of annual trend growth in real income (real GDP) of 2-2.5 per cent, an underlying annual decline in the velocity of circulation of M3 of 0.5-1 per cent and price trends in accordance with the ECB's definition of price stability (a year-on-year increase in HICP of below 2 per cent). The reference value of 4½ per cent was reconfirmed in December 1999 and again in December 2000. At the announcement in December 2000 the Governing Council noted that the available data was still insufficient to provide any basis for adjusting the assumption of the trend growth in real GDP despite structural progress in the euro area.
Under normal circumstances strong or persistent deviations of monetary growth from the reference value indicate upward pressure on prices, but in the short term the deviations can be explained by a range of factors. The ECB does not regard the reference value as a target to be controlled, but as an analytical tool to assess future inflation. The first pillar also includes analyses of the development in other monetary aggregates (M1, M2), trends in the various sub-components of M3, and an analysis of their counterparts on the balance sheets of monetary financial institutions, including growth in lending in particular.
The second pillar
The second pillar comprises an analysis of a number of real-economic and other indicators to assess the risks to price
stability, particularly in the short term and the medium term. These are output, demand and labour-market indicators, the
euro exchange rate, the balance of payments, fiscal-policy and financial indicators, and trends in price and cost indices.
The development in asset prices may also influence price development via the income account.
Under the second pillar macroeconomic projections prepared by the ECB and others also play a role as background material to the monetary-policy decisions of the Governing Council. In the Monthly Bulletin of December 2000 the ECB for the first time published macroeconomic projections compiled by ECB economists in cooperation with the national central banks of the euro area. The ECB states that these projections do not reflect the Governing Council's views or estimates. In contrast to a forecast the projections assume unchanged monetary policy and thus unchanged official interest rates and exchange rates. The intention of these assumptions is to clarify any consequences of an unchanged monetary policy in the projection period. The projections are thus not necessarily the best estimate of future trends, particularly not in the longer term, since monetary policy will respond to any changes in the price prospects.
The ECB's projections of inflation and growth in real GDP, including sub-components, are published as ranges to emphasise the uncertainty of the predictions. The uncertainty of the projections increases with the time horizon, which is reflected in broader ranges.
According to the projections the price-increase rate is expected to decline in the coming years. Since the preparation of the projections, oil prices have continued to fall and the euro has continued to strengthen. Both factors exert downward pressure on inflation.
According to the ECB the Governing Council cross checks the projections with other projections and other information concerning real-economic trends based on available indicators, including expectations of the future.
The ECB's macroeconomic projections for the Euro area
| Annual change, per cent | 19991 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 |
| Consumer-price index, HICP | 1.1 | 2.3-2.5 | 1.8-2.8 | 1.3-2.5 |
| GDP in constant prices | 2.5 | 3.2-3.6 | 2.6-3.6 | 2.5-3.5 |
| Of which: | ||||
| Private consumption | 2.8 | 2.3-2.7 | 2.2-3.2 | 1.7-3.3 |
| Government consumption | 1.4 | 0.8-2.0 | 0.6-1.6 | 0.9-1.9 |
| Gross fixed capital formation | 5.3 | 4.7-5.7 | 3.3-6.3 | 3.1-6.3 |
| Exports (goods and services) | 4.6 | 9.8-12.6 | 6.5-9.7 | 5.6-8.8 |
| Imports (goods and services) | 6.2 | 8.8-11.4 | 6.0-9.4 | 5.3-8.7 |
| Source: | ECB Monthly Bulletin, December 2000. |
| 1 | Actual figures. |
Monetary policy must be forward-looking in view of the medium-term orientation of the primary objective. Short-term price fluctuations do not necessarily call for a monetary-policy response. Cases in point are the effects of adjusting indirect taxes or the one-off effects of variations in international commodity prices, such as oil prices.
Interest-rate adjustments
The rate of increase in consumer prices rose in 2000 due to rising oil prices, a weakening of the effective euro exchange
rate, and increasing import and producer prices. During 2000 the rate of inflation thus exceeded the upper limit of 2 per
cent stated in the ECB's definition of price stability, cf. Chart 15.
Chart 15 Inflation in the Euro area
| Source: | EcoWin. |
The stronger activity contributed to a tightening of the labour market during the year.
Throughout 2000 monetary growth exceeded the reference value of 4½ per cent, although the growth rate was declining during most of the year. Credit to the private sector continued to expand at a high rate, cf. Chart 16.
Chart 16 Growth in m3 and in credit to the private sector in the Euro area
| Source: | ECB. |
In order to prevent transmission of rising import and producer prices to increased inflation expectations and thereby to price and wage formation, the ECB raised its official interest rates on 6 occasions in 2000 by a total of 1.75 per cent, cf. Chart 17.
Chart 17 Official interest rates and money-market interest rates in the Euro area
| Note: | The main refinancing rate is the minimum bid rate as from 28 June 2000. |
| Source: | ECB. |
The rates of interest for the two standing facilities, the marginal lending facility and the deposit facility, matched the rate of interest for the main refinancing operations. As a result, the interest-rate corridor for the day-to-day money-market interest rate, EONIA, cf. Box 2, was unchanged throughout 2000.
Box 2 The ECB's monetary-policy framework
By means of open market operations credit institutions are supplied with liquidity against collateral. Most of the liquidity is alloted in the main refinancing operations which are weekly tenders providing liquidity at a maturity of 14 days. Furthermore, the Eurosystem provides liquidity via long-term refinancing operations which are monthly tenders, providing liquidity at a maturity of three months. The Eurosystem may also apply fine-tuning operations to even out interest-rate fluctuations, particularly if they are caused by unexpected liquidity fluctuations. Finally, the Eurosystem may also carry out structural operations to adjust its structural position vis-à-vis the financial sector over a longer period./p>
The standing facilities aim to provide and absorb overnight liquidity. The credit institutions may use the marginal lending facility to obtain overnight liquidity against collateral, and the deposit facility to make overnight deposits. The standing facilities are made available via the national central banks of the euro area. The rates of interest on the standing facilities are normally the limits of EONIA (Euro Overnight Index Average).
Under the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system credit institutions in the euro area are obliged to deposit 2 per cent of selected liabilities with the national central banks. The reserve requirements must be met on average during a 1-month maintenance period from the 24th to the 23rd of the following month. The holdings of required reserves are remunerated at the rate of the Eurosystem's main refinancing operations.
On the last day of each maintenance period the reserve requirement becomes binding, so the EONIA rate may fluctuate more than usual. Strong fluctuations in the EONIA interest rate towards the end of a maintenance period are typically due to a liquity shortage among credit institutions with a view to compliance with the reserve requirement. A drop in EONIA at the end of a maintenance period can be attributed to ample liquidity among the credit institutions.
Foreign exchange
The monetary-policy strategy for the euro area does not include a target for the euro rate. Exchange-rate fluctuations as
such therefore do not evoke monetary-policy adjustments. The euro's exchange rate will result in a monetary-policy
response only in so far as it affects expectations of price and cost developments.
In view of the possible consequences for the world economy of the exchange-rate fluctuations, on 22 September 2000 the ECB, together with the central banks of the USA, Japan, Canada and the UK, intervened in support of the euro. The ECB intervened on a few more occasions during the first part of November.
In mid-September 2000 the ECB announced that inflows derived from the interest income of the foreign reserve assets would be sold against euro in order to maintain the structure and risk profile of the ECB's balance sheet as it was at the beginning of 1999.
With a view to its monetary-policy objective the ECB and the national central banks of the euro area conduct open-market operations, impose minimum reserve requirements on credit institutions, and offer standing facilities, cf. Box 2. This operational framework for monetary policy remained unchanged in 2000, with the exception of amendment of the liquidity allotment procedure in the main refinancing operations.
The main refinancing operations are intended to manage short-term money-market interest rates and the supply of liquidity to the money market. The main refinancing operations are carried out as weekly tenders supplying liquidity to the market at a maturity of 14 days against collateral. Until 28 June 2000 liquidity was allotted at a pre-announced fixed interest rate in connection with the main refinancing operations. However, the fixed-rate tender procedure gave rise to very high bids and low allotment ratios, cf. Chart 18.
Chart 18 Bid amounts and allotment ratios in the ECB's main refinancing operations
| Source: | ECB. |
With effect from 28 June 2000 the ECB therefore amended the tender procedure in the main refinancing operations from fixed-rate tenders to variable-rate tenders. Under the variable-rate tender procedure counterparties submit bids for interest rates as well as amounts. The bids with the highest interest rates are accommodated first and are payable at the bid rate (American auction). The ECB then accepts successively lower rates of interest until the desired allotment is reached. The marginal interest rate is the lowest rate at which liquidity is allotted. At the Governing Council's monetary-policy meetings a minimum bid rate is decided. The amendment of the tender procedure from fixed-rate to variable-rate tenders led to a strong decrease in the bid amounts, and a substantial increase in the allotment ratios. The total allotment of liquidity was virtually unchanged.
The dollar appreciated against the euro and the yen in 2000. However, the euro strengthened generally towards the end of the year.
The official interest rates of most industrialised countries rose during the year, whereas long-term interest rates fell. The decrease can be attributed primarily to a dampening of global growth towards the end of the year, but also a reduced need for new government bond issues in several countries.
The international stock markets were characterised by substantial fluctuations in prices for IT stocks and the year closed with significant price drops. The broad indices closed with a more moderate decline.
During 2000 the dollar strengthened by approximately 7 per cent vis-à-vis the euro. The dollar has risen by a good 20 per cent against the euro since the introduction on 1 January 1999, cf. Chart 19. The strengthening is related to stronger growth in the USA than in the euro area. European business enterprises' net acquisitions of US companies, and net portfolio investments from Europe to the USA also contributed to the dollar's strengthening.
Chart 19 Euro vis-à-vis dollar and yen
| Note: | Weekly observations. |
During the autumn the ECB, and in one instance also other central banks, intervened in support of the euro, cf. p. 45f. Together with indications of dampened growth in the US economy this significantly strengthened the euro against the dollar from the end of October to the beginning of January 2001. During this period the euro also strengthened against a number of other currencies.
The exchange rates of the major currencies fluctuate considerably over time, and the fluctuations between the dollar and the euro in 1999 and 2000 are thus not of any great magnitude.
The Japanese yen weakened particularly towards the close of 2000 against both the euro and the dollar. The currency weakened since the upswing in Japan is still fragile, especially in view of the weak private consumption.
At the end of 2000 the exchange rate for sterling against euro was at the same level as at the beginning of the year, cf. Chart 20. Sterling thus did not follow the dollar as closely as before. Sterling's weakening against the dollar was attributable to the strong US economy in the first half of 2000.
Chart 20 Swedish krona, norwegian krone and pound sterling vis-à-vis Euro
| Note: | Weekly observations. |
During the year the Norwegian krone was almost unchanged against the euro. The Swedish krona weakened by 3 per cent against the euro in 2000, reflecting a strengthening during the first four months of the year, followed by a weakening in the remainder of 2000. This trend is related to such factors as price trends for technology stocks, cf. p. 53ff, in view of the large number of high-tech companies in Sweden. The weakening against the euro since end-October should also be viewed in the light of the relatively low Swedish short-term interest rates compared to the euro area, as well as Swedish portfolio investments abroad and the general strengthening of the euro.
The official interest rates of most industrialised countries rose during 2000, whereas long-term government-bond yields fell, cf. Chart 21. By the end of 2000 the yield curve had levelled off in the USA and Germany. This may reflect market expectations of monetary-policy relaxations.
Chart 21 Changes in term structures in Germany and the USA
| Note: | The yield curves are based on yields to maturity. |
During the first half of 2000 the Federal Reserve of the USA raised the federal funds target rate by a total of 1 per cent to 6.5 per cent. This is the highest level since the beginning of 1991. The interest rate was raised in view of the risk of rising inflation as a consequence of strong growth in the US economy, a tight labour market and rising energy prices. The considerable dampening of the economy towards the end of the year caused the Federal Reserve to lower the federal funds target rate on two occasions during January 2001 by a total of 1.0 per cent to 5.5 per cent. In 2000 the yield on 10-year US government bonds fell by 1.3 per cent to 5.2 per cent at year-end, cf. Chart 22. This decline can be attributed to the slowdown in the US economy towards the end of the year, as well as a reduced requirement for issue of US government bonds, cf. Box 3, as well as stock-market volatility.
Chart 22 10-year government-bond yields
| Note: | Weekly observations. |
Box 3 Reduced government financing requirements
In recent years a number of industrialised countries, with Japan as a notable exception, have significantly improved their government budgets. This has reduced the supply of government bonds and thereby contributed to falling long-term interest rates. Furthermore, the financing requirements of several European countries were influenced in 2000 by extraordinary receipts from the sale of UMTS licences (transmission licences for third-generation mobile telephony). In Germany the sale of UMTS licences thus generated receipts of more than euro 50 billion or approximately 2.5 per cent of GDP. However, the receipts from UMTS licences vary considerably among the individual countries.
| 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | |
| USA | -3.1 | -2.2 | -0.9 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 2.3 |
| Japan | -3.6 | -4.2 | -3.3 | -5.0 | -7.0 | -6.0 |
| Germany | -3.3 | -3.4 | -2.7 | -2.1 | -1.4 | 1.4 |
| UK | -5.8 | -4.4 | -2.0 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| Denmark | -2.3 | -1.0 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 2.7 |
| Source: | OECD Economic Outlook No. 68, November 2000. |
Throughout 2000, 10-year yields in Japan fluctuated within a narrow range, just below 2 per cent. The low level reflects weak growth and deflation. This overshadowed the substantial government bond issues. In the first two months of 2001 long-term interest rates decreased by 0.3 per cent to 1.4 per cent. In August 2000 the Bank of Japan decided to raise the benchmark interest rate by 0.1 per cent to 0.25 per cent, which ended the "zero-interest-rate policy" whereby the leading interest rates were kept close to zero. The background to the increase was the slightly more positive prospects for the Japanese economy. In February 2001 the Bank of Japan lowered the benchmark interest rate by 0.1 per cent to 0.15 per cent, in view of the dampening of economic activity in Japan, as well as falling stock prices, continued deflation and the slowdown in global growth.
In the euro area the ECB in 2000 raised the interest rate for the main refinancing operations by a total of 1.75 per cent, cf. p. 45. The yield on the benchmark 10-year German government bond fell by 0.5 per cent to 4.9 per cent at the close of the year. This can be attributed to the lower financing requirement in the euro area member states, cf. Box 3, as well as falling interest rates in the USA, and a moderate dampening of growth in the euro area towards the end of the year, in view of factors such as the higher official interest rates and rising oil prices.
In the UK the Bank of England in January and February 2000 raised the base rate by a total of 0.5 per cent to 6.0 per cent on the grounds of high capacity utilisation and accelerating growth. In February 2001 the Bank of England lowered the base rate by 0.25 per cent to 5.75 per cent, primarily due to low inflationary pressure. The yield on UK 10-year government bonds declined by 0.6 per cent to 4.9 per cent in the course of the year and in several periods was below the yield for equivalent German government bonds, cf. Chart 22. The decrease is related to moderate inflation and a reduction of government bond issues as a consequence of an improvement in government finances. The strong demand for long-term government bonds from pension funds and life assurance companies contributed to the decline in long-term interest rates, cf. Box 4.
Box 4 The impact of interest-rate guarantees on long-term interest rates
Pension funds and life assurance companies in a number of European countries are committed to paying a minimum return to their customers, i.e. an interest-rate guarantee. This guarantee has become more and more important in recent years, in view of the declining trend in global interest rates. The pension funds and life assurance companies need to place funds in long-term bonds in order to hedge the risk associated with this commitment. Furthermore, the method of calculating the solvency ratio has been adjusted in some countries, which has increased the placement requirement in long-term securities, and thereby demand for long-term bonds. The strong demand contributed to the decline in long-term interest rates. This was the case particularly in the UK, where long-term interest rates (30-year) are very low, but the trend was also seen in Denmark.
Development in interest rates in Denmark
In Denmark yields in the bond market followed the trends in the euro area during 2000. The Danish yield curve had
thus also levelled out by the end of the year, cf. Chart 23.
Chart 23 Danish bond market, term structure of zero-coupon rates
| Note: | The zero-coupon rate is the yield to maturity on a bond with only one payment. The zero-coupon rate is a unique measure of the yield for the individual maturities. In general, it is not possible to observe the zero-coupon rate, which must instead be estimated. |
Yields on 10-year government bonds had fallen by 0.5 per cent to 5.2 per cent by the end of the year. The 10-year yield differential to Germany fluctuated in the range of 0.30-0.55 per cent during 2000, cf. Chart 24. The moderate fluctuations in the yield differential both before and after the referendum on Denmark's adoption of the euro reflected sustained confidence in the Danish economy and the fixed-exchange- rate policy. At end-2000, Denmark's yield differential to Germany was lower than those of e.g. Belgium and Italy, the primary reason being that the government debts of Belgium and Italy are significantly higher than Denmark's debt.
Chart 24 10-year government-bond yield differentials to Germany
| Note: | Weekly observations. |
The decline in government-bond yields during 2000 affected the Danish mortgage-credit market to some degree. The extent of re- mortgaging of mortgage-credit bonds is described on p. 58f.
In 2000 the Association of Danish Mortgage Banks began to publish average yields for respectively new 30-year mortgage-credit-bond issues and mortgage-credit bonds with a maturity of 1-2 years, cf. Chart 25. The average yield for short-term mortgage-credit bonds had risen by approximately 1 per cent by the end of 2000. The spread between the two average yields peaked in the autumn of 1999, but has since narrowed considerably, in line with the trend in the government securities market. The levelling-out of the yield curve has reduced the immediate advantage of financing at variable interest rates.
Chart 25 Yield averages for new mortgage-credit bond issues
| Note: | Weekly averages. |
| Source: | The Association of Danish Mortgage Banks. |
Prices for Danish index-linked bonds fell in connection with first the publicity concerning the government's proposal to restructure the taxation of pension yields, and then the publication of the bill, cf. p. 62. The background to the decline is that the after-tax yield on other bonds will be increased relative to index-linked bonds issued prior to 1 January 1999.
2000 was a turbulent year in the global stock markets, and prices for particularly IT stocks fluctuated considerably. Overall for the year prices for IT stocks declined, after strong price increases for several years. The US Nasdaq index, with an overweight of technology stocks, thus fell by 39 per cent in 2000, while the broad-based Dow Jones and S&P 500 indices, with smaller proportions of technology stocks, closed the year with more moderate price decreases, cf. Chart 26. The general uncertainty concerning IT stocks led to day-to-day fluctuations in the Nasdaq index: nine of the ten largest percentage increases so far in Nasdaq's 29 years of existence thus took place in 2000, as did four of the ten strongest percentage drops so far.
Chart 26 Stock indices, USA
| Note: | Weekly observations. |
The Nasdaq index rose in the first months of the year, and reached its highest level so far at the beginning of March. However, continuing strong economic indicators for the US economy and prospects of further measures to tighten monetary policy drove investors towards other sectors in the stock market traditionally associated with less risk. This led to strong price drops for IT stocks as from the end of March.
This decline gained further momentum from the beginning of September, and by the end of December the Nasdaq reached its lowest level in 2000. The prospects of a slowdown in the US economy, with greater pressure on business earnings, as well as the continued risk of rising inflation primarily due to the tight labour market and high oil prices were the main factors contributing to the decline in the autumn.
The falling price trends for IT stocks continued in 2001. By the end of February the Nasdaq index had thus dropped by 13 per cent against the level at the end of 2000.
The same pattern was apparent in Europe. The Neuer Markt index, which has an overweight of IT stocks, fell during the year, while the more broadly based indices were virtually unchanged, cf. Chart 27. Stocks in telecom enterprises also dropped. The European telecom sector was subject to pressure due to the surge in costs for third-generation mobile telephony licences and a growing need for ongoing expansion and consolidation. In the European Dow Jones Euro Stoxx index the telecom sub-index thus accounted for the strongest decline among all sub-indices in 2000.
Chart 27 Stock indices, Europe and Japan
| Note: | Weekly observations. |
Besides the falling technology stock prices the Japanese stock market was influenced by events related to the financial sector. A large retail chain went into liquidation during the summer, which heightened concern about the financial situation of the Japanese banks.
Among the Nordic countries the stock markets of Finland and Sweden were particularly affected by the price drops for technology stocks. This can be attributed primarily to the very high weighting of respectively Nokia and Ericsson stocks in the Finnish and Swedish indices. The Danish KFX index, which has a relatively small proportion of technology stocks, yielded the highest return among the Nordic indices in 2000, cf. Chart 28. Trends in 2000 were thus in striking contrast to 1999, when especially the Swedish and Finnish stock indices performed significantly better than the KFX index.
Chart 28 Stock indices, Nordic countries
| Note: | Weekly observations. |
On 1 September the Copenhagen Stock Exchange introduced the KVX index of growth companies, primarily in the technology sector. The global decline in prices for technology stocks also affected the KVX index, which had dropped by 37 per cent by the turn of the year.
The volume of outstanding domestic krone-denominated bonds rose by 4 per cent in 2000. This reflects a decrease in the circulating volume of government bonds, and an increase in the volume of mortgage-credit bonds.
As an element of the Nordic stock-exchange cooperation, NOREX, in October 2000 the Copenhagen Stock Exchange extended the joint trading system, SAXESS, to include bond trading. On 1 January 2000 VP A/S - The Danish Securities Centre was restructured as a limited liability company.
For the sixth consecutive year the banks presented a sound surplus. Net income from interest is still the largest source of revenue.
There was a certain dampening of activity in the mortgage-credit sector, which is related to a lower influx of new loans and a lower conversion volume.
There was a large increase in the capital managed by investment associations.
The outstanding volume of domestic krone-denominated bonds was nominal kr. 1,982 billion at the end of 2000, which is an increase by 4 per cent on 1999, cf. Table 6.
Table 6 Outstanding volumes of domestic krone-denominated bonds (nominal value)
| Kr. billion | 1999 | 2000 |
| Government bonds | 649 | 626 |
| Mortgage-credit bonds | 1,141 | 1,240 |
| Other bonds | 119 | 116 |
| Total | 1,908 | 1,982 |
| Note: | Listed on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange |
As a consequence of the government budget surplus the circulating volume of government bonds fell by kr. 23 billion, whereas the circulating volume of mortgage-credit bonds increased by a total of kr. 99 billion during the year. As a per cent of GDP the volume of outstanding bonds decreased from 157 per cent of GDP in 1999 to 154 per cent 2000.
In 2000 mortgage-credit bonds for kr. 100 billion were redeemed prematurely. For comparison, the figure for 1999 was kr. 231 billion. The decrease reflects that changes in interest rates have not been sufficient to justify further conversions, cf. Chart 29.
Chart 29 Early redemptions of mortgage-credit bonds and bond yields
| Note: | The leading 30-year mortgage-credit bond is the series priced below par in which bond loans are typically issued. A switch to a new series takes place when a suitable outstanding volume has been reached. The yield on the leading 30-year mortgage-credit bond is not a precise indicator of when it is favourable to remortgage. Figures for early redemptions in 1993 are not available. |
Almost half the circulating volume of krone-denominated bonds is held by financial institutions, insurance companies and pension funds, cf. Chart 30. Non-resident investors hold 18 per cent of the bonds.
Chart 30 Ownership of circulating krone-denominated bonds, end-2000
| Source: | Statistics Denmark |
| Note: | Statistics Denmark's sector distribution of Danish krone-denominated bonds has been adjusted for repurchase agreements between Danish banks and non-residents. In addition, estimated corrections have been made for residents' safekeeping accounts with foreign banks, e.g. Euroclear. Bond holdings are shown at their market values. |
In 2000 non-resident investors sold krone-denominated bonds for kr. 17 billion. Sales of government bonds totalled kr. 13 billion, while sales of mortgage-credit bonds totalled kr. 4 billion. In 1999 net purchases by non-resident investors were kr. 15 billion. Non-residents' holdings of krone-denominated bonds still predominantly comprise government bonds, but the proportion of mortgage-credit bonds is rising.
The minimum coupon rate [1] was raised from 4 to 5 per cent on 1 July 2000, but lowered again to 4 per cent on 1 January 2001. The increase affected the issue of government bonds, as sales of one series with a coupon of 4 per cent had to be discontinued.
The development in interest rates in the Danish bond market is described on p. 53ff.
Change in market conventions in the Danish bond market
In 1997 a working group of market participants was set up to review EMU and the bond market. One of the
recommendations of this working group was that, no matter whether Denmark adopted the euro or not, the Danish
market conventions for calculation of the coupon rate on the purchase and sale of bonds should be aligned with
international standards. The aim was to make Danish bonds more attractive to international investors.
The recommendations were implemented in the bond market in February 2001 and comprise the following elements: the day-count convention in the Danish market is changed from 30/360 to actual/actual. This means that when bonds are traded the interest is calculated on the basis of the actual number of days from and including the last due date to the value date of the trade. The new convention thus gives a fairer view than the old method of calculation, which operated with 30-day months. In addition, the ex-coupon period has been abolished, so that in future the owner of the bond on the day before the due date will receive the coupon interest for the term in question. Previously, this payment accrued to the owner 30 days before the due date. At the same time, the drawing procedure for mortgage-credit bonds and government serial loans has been changed from a model based on redemption by lot to a purely mathematical model. This means that in future the same relative share of all investors' bond holdings will be drawn. As a result of the new procedure, the unit size for Danish bonds has been changed from kr. 1,000 to kr. 0.01.
European stock-exchange cooperation, etc.
Mergers, acquisitions and cooperation are still on the agenda of the European stock exchanges. However, the planned
alliance[2] between eight European stock exchanges was abandoned in 2000. In March 2000 the stock exchanges in
Paris, Amsterdam and Brussels announced their merger under the name of Euronext with a common trading system.
In May 2000 the London Stock Exchange and Deutsche Börse announced that they would be merging.[3] However, the attempted merger failed in September 2000. In the autumn of 2000 the Swedish OM Group made an unsuccessful bid for the London Stock Exchange.
The consolidation trend among EU securities centres also continues. The background includes the demand for easy and efficient settlement of cross-border trades, as well as a need for joint clearing and settlement when stock exchanges form alliances.
The Luxembourg-based international securities centre, Cedel, merged with the German securities centre Deutsche Börse Clearing under the name of Clearstream. French Sicovam merged with the international securities centre Euroclear, which went on to acquire a controlling interest in Dutch Negicef and Belgian CIK. Negicef and CIK have signed letters of intent to merge with Euroclear. This cooperation supports Euronext, which in the longer term will integrate trade, clearing and settlement.
Nordic stock-exchange cooperation
In 1998 the Copenhagen Stock Exchange and OM Stockholmsbörsen entered into a cooperation agreement on the
establishment of a joint Nordic securities market, NOREX, comprising all types of securities. The Nordic alliance is
based on a joint trading system, SAXESS.
The Iceland Stock Exchange and the Oslo Stock Exchange joined the NOREX alliance in 2000. The Iceland Stock Exchange switched to the joint trading system in October 2000, while the system is expected to be in operation in Norway before the end of 2001. Once the system has been introduced in Norway, it will be possible to trade securities in all four Nordic countries via one system. The three Baltic stock exchanges have signed letters of intent to join NOREX. In February 2001 the Finnish HEX Group offered to acquire a controlling interest in the Estonian stock exchange.
In June 1999 the Copenhagen Stock Exchange introduced the joint trading system SAXESS in the share market. In October 2000 SAXESS was extended to include bond trading. After the transfer of bond trading to SAXESS the Copenhagen Stock Exchange can once again offer the Danish securities market share and bond trading on the same system. The Iceland Stock Exchange and OM Stockholmsbörsen have also opened up for trade in both shares and bonds via the SAXESS system.
New regulation of the stock-exchange area, etc.
In April 1998 the Securities Market Council set up a working group to prepare an order on best execution on the stock
market, based on the Rules of Ethics of the Copenhagen Stock Exchange. A draft order was submitted for general
consultation in late 2000.
In December 2000 the Folketing (Parliament) passed a bill to amend the taxation of pension yields, cf. the Nationalbank's response on p. 157. The new Act introduces a uniform 15 per cent tax on all pension yields from shares, bonds and real property. In addition, the share ceiling is made more flexible; in future, the financial solvency of the individual institution will determine how large a proportion of the assets can be placed in shares. The new rules on taxation of institutional investors' capital yields are neutral in relation to portfolio restructuring within the sector. With a few exceptions, the Act takes effect as from the 2001 income year.
On 1 January 2000, VP A/S - The Danish Securities Centre, was restructured from a private self-governing institution to a limited liability company. This was done in order to give VP optimum opportunities to establish a more business-oriented profile under changing market conditions, possibly via a merger or other form of closer international cooperation.
The decision was taken by the Board of VP and was effected in accordance with the restructuring provisions of the Danish Securities Trading Act. VP's existing equity capital was encapsulated in a new company as an undestributable securities reserve. The shareholders in the new company comprise the stakeholders previously represented on the Board of VP, who also represent VP's most significant customers. Banks and stockbrokers hold 43 per cent of the share capital, mortgage-credit institutes 28 per cent, Danmarks Nationalbank 13 per cent, issuers of shares 8 per cent and investors 8 per cent.
Joint Act on Financial Enterprises
In August 1997 the government appointed a Committee on "the Financial Sector after the Year 2000". The report of
the Committee was published in September 1999. Subsequently a bill was prepared and introduced. It implemented a
number of recommendations from the Committee, including a joint Act on Financial Enterprises.
On the basis of the greater integration of the financial markets, including the formation of financial conglomerates, it has been deemed necessary to implement a new structure for the financial supervisory acts, cf. the Nationalbank's consultative response, p. 153f. The aim is to ensure that similar financial products are treated in the same way and to introduce a number of measures to simplify and modernise this area. Consequently, related provisions from the Act on Danish Commercial Banks and Savings Banks, the Act on Insurance Companies, the Act on Investment Companies, the Mortgage Credit Act and the Act on Company Pension Funds will be compiled in an Act on Financial Enterprises.
The bill compiles the supervisory provisions and other statutory areas where there is presently a high degree of concurrence in the financial acts. These areas are: definitions, rules on good practice, management rules, group rules, accounting rules and rules of supervision. A number of provisions will be adjusted and some will be updated.
The sector-specific provisions of the various financial acts will remain in force. However, there are plans subsequently to review the other elements of the financial acts with a view to achieving an even more uniform structure and further simplification of e.g. the provisions on the establishment of financial enterprises, permission to carry on financial activities, solvency, mergers, etc.
In connection with the compilation, the accounting provisions are amended in accordance with the proposed amendments in the bill on annual accounts. The latter is inspired by the latest developments in the accounting field, including the EU's recent accounting strategy based on the international accounting standards, IAS, issued by the International Accounting Standards Committee, IASC. It is also proposed that the dual auditor system be abolished.
Status of new capital-adequacy rules
In January 2001 the Basle Committee[4] issued a new consultative document on new capital requirements for banks[5]. In February 2001 it was followed up by a new consultative document from the European Commission.[6]
The reason for introducing new rules is a need to establish a closer relationship between the banks' actual risk profile and the capital requirement. For instance, the existing rules from 1988 do not distinguish between the credit risk in relation to private borrowers and corporate customers, which means that the present standard capital requirement is 8 per cent, irrespective of the composition of this element of the loan portfolio.
The proposed new rules will to a greater extent than the existing set of rules take financial innovation, modern risk-management techniques, and internal control procedures, and the new types of risk into account, cf. Box 5. Under the existing rules, capital requirements apply only to credit and market risks. However, capital requirements in relation to operational risks are also proposed. The structure of the new capital-adequacy rules gives the banks an incentive to enhance and improve their own risk management. The underlying philosophy is that the individual bank is best at assessing its own "true" risk profile.
Box 5 The new capital-adequacy rules
The proposed new regulatory regime rests on three pillars: minimum capital requirements, the supervisory review process and market discipline. In comparison with the first consultation papers from 1999 the new proposal is far more detailed as regards methods for calculating capital requirements in relation to credit risk, credit-risk reducing techniques, management of operational risks, the supervisory review process and market discipline.
Pillar 1 operates with 3 methods for determining the minimum capital requirements. One is a reshaping of the standardised approach, providing for the use of the ratings attributed by the external agencies. The other two methods are based on internal ratings where the weighting of the credit risk for each loan is calculated on the basis of the banks' own assessments of their customers. Since the publication of the first consultation paper the latter has been supplemented with a more advanced internal ratings-based approach, giving banks an even greater opportunity to determine for themselves how great a capital buffer they need to provide for unexpected losses on loans. In addition to the capital requirement to cover credit risks, a capital requirement for operational risks will be introduced.
Pillar 2 relating to the role of the supervisory authorities and pillar 3 relating to market discipline (banks should provide market participants with more detailed information about, e.g., their risk and capital structures) have been extended considerably in comparison with the original proposals from 1999.
It is the aim of the Basle Committee to avoid (average) changes in the overall capital base when using the standard method, taking into account the capital requirements for operational risk. For the internal rating methods the Basle Committee seeks to achieve a minor relaxation in relation to the standard method in order to increase the incentive to use it and thereby achieve more correct risk management.
For the sixth consecutive year the banks' financial statements presented a sound surplus. In 2000, the result after tax was kr. 14.3 billion. Net income from interest, which rose by 6.4 per cent on 1999, is still the largest source of revenue for the banks. Deposits and lending increased by 1 per cent and 13 per cent, respectively. Net income from fees and commission increased by 22.2 per cent, partly as a result of increasing brokerage and administration fees related to customers' increased securities trading.
Value adjustment of bonds, shares, foreign exchange and capital interests also contributed to the improved result. Total value adjustment increased from kr. 5.2 billion in 1999 to kr. 9.2 billion in 2000.
Losses and provisions rose marginally in 2000, to kr. 3.0 billion from kr. 2.6 billion in 1999, and are still low.
Structural changes
The year 2000 also saw a number of structural changes within the banking sector, with the creation of national and
cross-border financial conglomerates. In recent years the focus has shifted from the domestic Danish market to a single
Nordic market. The term conglomerates is used to describe groups carrying out business in a number of financial
market segments (banking, mortgage credit, insurance, etc.), whereas traditional financial groups typically operate in a
single market segment. The market share of the financial conglomerates has increased significantly in terms of total
balance sheet, cf. Chart 31. In 1989 financial conglomerates accounted for less than 10 per cent of the total balance
sheet. This figure had risen to just over 60 per cent by 1999.
Chart 31 Groups and conglomerates' share of total balance sheet
| Note: | A financial group is normally the term used to describe financial enterprises connected by ownership. They consist of the parent company and at least one other financial enterprise. Traditional financial groups typically operate in one market segment, while a conglomerate is a group operating in several financial market segments (banking, mortgage credit, insurance, etc.) |
| Source: | The Danish Financial Supervisory Authority. |
The largest cross-border merger so far took place in the spring of 2000 when Unidanmark merged with Finnish/Swedish MeritaNordbanken, thereby creating the largest financial conglomerate in the Nordic region with a major physical presence in several Nordic countries. The conglomerate was named Nordic Baltic Holding, but has subsequently after merging in October 2000 with the Norwegian bank, Christiania Bank og Kreditkasse been renamed Nordea.
Another example of this trend is the merger between Danske Bank and RealDanmark from the autumn of 2000. The merger led to the creation of in the second-largest financial conglomerate in the Nordic region.
Activities in the mortgage-credit sector dampened to a degree, which was due mainly to a decrease in re-mortgaging activities and a lower volume of new loans. Conversions, cf. Chart 29, accounted for a large proportion of gross new lending in 1998 and 1999.
In 2000 two new mortgage-credit products were launched: interest-rate guarantee for adjustable-rate loans, and reversed mortgage loans. Interest-rate guarantee entails that the borrower pays a premium in return for which a limit is placed on the interest rate on the loan in connection with the annual refinancing of the entire adjustable-rate loan. The reversed mortgage loan product is a variant of the well-known products offering home-owners loans against the free mortgageable value of the home. Examples are supplementary loans and bank loans.
In the summer of 2000 a number of general amendments to the Mortgage Credit Act were adopted, and subsequently an order was issued on the mortgage-credit institutes' bond issues, balance principle and interest and foreign-exchange risks. The order took effect from 1 April 2001, cf. p. 152. The new rules will contribute to greater flexibility in the mortgage-credit sector, without significantly increasing the risk exposure of the mortgage-credit institutes or weakening the special status of mortgage-credit bonds. At the same time, clearer and more up-to-date rules have been introduced in a number of areas.
During the last four years there has been a large increase in the capital managed by investment associations, cf. Chart 32. As of 31 December 2000 the assets totalled kr. 257 billion, an increase of kr. 53 billion on 1999.
Chart 32 Assets of the investment associations
| Source: | The Federation of Danish Investment Associations, Market statistics, end of 2000. |
Investment associations based on foreign shares achieved the largest growth in assets, i.e. kr. 32 billion from 1999 to 2000. The increase in value for foreign shares comprises new emissions of kr. 48 billion, and capital losses of kr. 16 billion.
The trend is for greater specialisation of the investment associations. Examples are investment associations with focus on IT, ethics or biotechnology.
VB Finans
At the end of 1993 the Nationalbank made available a government-guaranteed overdraft of maximum kr. 4.4 billion to
VB Finans, the company responsible for the winding-up of Varde Bank. As described in the 1996 Annual Report, p.
54f, at the beginning of 1996 bankruptcy proceedings were instigated against VB Finans, at the request of the Board of
Directors. VB Finans af 1996, which in connection with the winding-up took over all VB Finans' assets and certain
liabilities, including the Nationalbank's overdraft facility, worked throughout 2000 on winding up the activities of Varde
Bank.
During 2000 the company was able to pay approximately kr. 0.1 billion to the Nationalbank as a consequence of the winding-up of exposures and the sale of properties. The company's debt to the Nationalbank had thus been settled by the end of the year.
The ongoing winding-up of the company first and foremost concerns the conclusion of a number of court cases filed against the winding-up estate. In the autumn of 2000 the Nationalbank filed two cases against the estate, both related to the preferential position of the subordinate capital in the estate. The administration of the winding-up estate will continue for a few more years. It is therefore still not possible to calculate the total costs of the winding-up of Varde Bank.
Himmerlandsbanken
In 2000 no amounts were disbursed under the guarantee provided by the Nationalbank and a number of banks to the
winding-up estate of Himmerlandsbanken, cf. the 1993 Annual Accounts p. 48ff. A number of court cases filed against
the winding-up estate have not yet been concluded. Consequently, it is still not possible to calculate the total costs of the
winding-up of Himmerlandsbanken.
[1] A bond complies with the minimum-coupon-rate rule with the designation "blue-stamped" if the coupon rate is greater than or equal to the minimum-coupon rate applying to the period during which the bond is issued. On an increase in the minimum-coupon rate issues in many open series will normally be discontinued.
[2] For further details see Danmarks Nationalbank, Report and Accounts, 1999.
[3] Later this merger was extended to include the American Nasdaq exchange.
[4] The Basle Committee, whose secretariat is at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), was set up in 1975 with the purpose of strengthening the stability of the international financial system. The following countries are represented on the Committee: Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden, UK, USA, Switzerland and Luxembourg.
[5] See also Suzanne Hyldahl, New Capital-Adequacy Rules for Banks, Danmarks Nationalbank, Monetary Review, 1st Quarter 2001.
[6] The first consultative documents on proposed new capital-adequacy rules were published by the Basle Committee in June 1999 and by the European Commission in November 1999. The work of the two bodies has been carried out in parallel, but while the Basle Committee has focused on standards for the large international banks, the European Commission has had a more EU-specific angle, covering both banks and investment companies. However, the two consultative documents are in many ways similar. The consultations for both proposals run until the end of May 2001. The new standards are expected to be implemented in the national legislation of the EU member states in 2004.
At the end of 2000 banknotes and coins in circulation amounted to kr. 44.8 billion. This represents a decrease of kr. 1.6 billion against the previous year, when particularly the stocks of cash depots and banks were extraordinarily high owing to special year-2000 measures.
In April 2000 Danmarks Nationalbank issued a commemorative coin to mark the 60th birthday of Queen Margrethe II.
At the request of the government the Nationalbank prepared the preliminary design of Danish euro coins.
The withdrawal of old banknotes, Series 1972, is proceeding according to plan, but old banknotes for a value of kr. 3.3 billion are still in circulation.
The total banknotes and coins in circulation[1] at the close of 2000 amounted to kr. 44.8 billion, which represents a decrease of kr. 1.6 billion against the previous year, but an increase of kr. 3.8 billion against 1998. Over a two-year period the circulation of banknotes and coins has thus increased by kr. 1.9 billion per year. This generally corresponds to the trend of the preceding years.
The circulation of banknotes was extraordinarily high at the close of 1999 due to the contingency measures in connection with the millennium rollover, cf. the 1999 Annual Report p. 67ff. An increase in the stocks of cash depots and bank branches, including ATMs, accounted for the major part of the increase. The extraordinary measures were phased out during January 2000, so that the circulation of banknotes returned to the normal level. At kr. 40.6 billion, the value of banknotes in circulation at end-2000 was therefore kr. 1.8 billion lower than one year before.
The circulation of banknotes in 2000 followed the trend of previous years. Use of the small denominations (50- and 100-krone notes) are used most during the summer months, cf. Chart 33. Circulation of banknotes is influenced by factors such as public holidays and the seasons of the year.
Chart 33 Circulation of individual banknotes
| Note: | End of month. |
Over the past two years the 200-krone note has seen the greatest increase in circulation. This has been at the expense of the 100-krone note. The main reason is that 200-krone notes have increasingly replaced 100- krone notes in ATMs. The total circulation is shown in Table 2a, p. 164.
Pursuant to the Danmarks Nationalbank Act of 1936 the circulation of banknotes must be covered by the Nationalbank's holdings of gold and other assets. Since September 1939 an exception has been made from the gold coverage provision.
Coins in circulation increased by 5.0 per cent to kr. 4.1 billion in 2000. The corresponding figures for 1999 and 1998 were 3.6 per cent and 5.1 per cent, respectively. The total coins in circulation and The Royal Mint's production are presented in Table 3a, p. 165.
Commemorative coin to mark the 60th birthday of Queen Margrethe
II
It is a tradition in Denmark to issue commemorative coins to mark special royal events. Commemorative coins were
therefore issued in connection with Queen Margrethe's 60th birthday on 16 April. The coins were designed by the
sculptor, Professor Mogens Møller, cf. Box 6.
Box 6 Commemorative coins to mark the 60th birthday of Queen Margrethe II
The Queen was presented with two commemorative coins of fine gold. In addition, 61,000 200-krone coins of fine silver were minted, as well as one million 20-krone coins of the same alloy and size as the ordinary 20-krone coins in circulation.
The commemorative coins are legal tender, but are purchased mainly by collectors. As encashment is therefore not very likely, the seigniorage from the issue of the 20-krone coin has been calculated at kr. 19 million, half of which has been paid to the Crown and half to the Ministry of Economic Affairs for charitable purposes.
Replacement of Series 1972 by Series 1997
The present series of banknotes was put into circulation in 1997-99. The various denominations have been replaced at
varying speeds, reflecting the degree to which the individual banknotes are used and how they are treated by users. The
100-krone note was replaced at a slightly faster rate than the other banknotes. 86 per cent of the old 100-krone notes
had been withdrawn from circulation after 13 months, cf. Chart 34, whereas only approximately 78 per cent of the old
50-krone notes had been withdrawn by the end of 2000.
The total current circulation of Series-1972 banknotes is kr. 3.3 billion. It must be expected that a proportion of the old banknotes will never be returned to the Nationalbank. There were still 5-, 10- and 20-krone notes for a value of kr. 205 million in circulation at end-2000[2].
Chart 34 Remaining proportion of series 1972 in circulation
| Note: | End of month. |
After rising throughout the 1990s, the number of counterfeit banknotes found in circulation has remained more or less unchanged since 1998.
From 1999 to 2000 the number of counterfeit banknotes found in circulation decreased moderately from 673 to 665, cf. Chart 35. The most frequently counterfeited banknote in 2000 was the 500-krone banknote; almost half the counterfeit banknotes found in circulation were 500-krone banknotes. The number of confiscated banknotes which had not been put into circulation varies from year to year. In 2000, 152 counterfeit banknotes were seized, which is 10 less than in 1999.
Chart 35 Number of counterfeit banknotes
| Source: | The police. |
The incidence of counterfeiting is very limited in Denmark. In 2000 there were 5.1 counterfeit banknotes for each million genuine banknotes. This figure is very low in relation to comparable countries, cf. Chart 36.
Chart 36 Counterfeit banknotes found in circulation in 2000, international comparision
| Sources: | National central banks. |
| Note: | Figures for Sweden are from 1999. |
One reason for the low number might be that Danish banknotes are generally of high quality. Worn banknotes which can be more difficult to identify as genuine are withdrawn from circulation when they are received by a bank and are returned to the Nationalbank, where they are replaced with new banknotes.
In connection with the issue of the present series the Nationalbank conducted an information campaign to enhance familiarity with the new banknotes as well as awareness of the security elements used. Although the incidence of counterfeiting is low, the Nationalbank has continuous focus on increasing the security of the Danish banknotes.
In connection with the referendum on 28 September on Denmark's adoption of the euro, at the request of the government, the Nationalbank prepared a preliminary design of Danish euro coins, cf. Box 7. All euro coins have a common side, as well as a national side designed by the individual member states.
Box7 Proposed national sides og danish Euro coins
The design was presented at a press conference at the Ministry of Economic Affairs on 22 August 2000.
[1] Calculated in accordance with the Nationalbank's balance sheet, cf. Table 2a, p. 164 and Table 3a, p. 165.
[2] Also includes 5-, 10- and 20-krone notes from note series dating back to 1945.
From 1999 to 2000 the number of VP transactions more than doubled. The joint European payment system, TARGET, has been in operation for two years. Use of the system is increasing steadily, and TARGET has become the standard system for large cross-border payments. In 2000 a scheme was introduced to reimburse TARGET participants for any losses in connection with system downtime. Danmarks Nationalbank is developing a new system for payments in kroner and euro, KRONOS, which in time will become the Danish interface to the TARGET system. Internationally there is growing awareness of safety and efficiency in relation to payment and securities settlement systems.
The Nationalbank is the settlement bank for four payment systems in kroner. The Nationalbank makes available accounts via which the participants exchange payments. Table 7 presents the turnover of the krone payment systems.
Table 7 Krone payment systems
| 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | |
| DN Inquiry and Transfer System | ||||
| Number of transactions, '000 | 369 | 384 | 368 | 388 |
| Amount per transaction, kr. million | 49.10 | 56.39 | 57.03 | 66.17 |
| Sum clearing | ||||
| Number of transactions, '000 | 656,027 | 713,880 | 754,309 | 789,529 |
| Amount per transaction, kr. '000 | 4.95 | 5.16 | 5.08 | 5.14 |
| VP settlement | ||||
| Number of trading transactions, '000 | 3,296 | 3,382 | 3,530 | 6,815 |
| Amount per transaction, kr. million | 4.87 | 6.80 | 6.23 | 3.31 |
| FUTOP settlement | ||||
| Number of contracts, '000 | - | - | 1,735 | 1,042 |
| Number of old contract size1, '000 | 561 | 421 | 222 | - |
| Sources: | Danmarks Nationalbank, the Danish Bankers' Association, VP A/S - The Danish Securities Centre and the Copenhagen Stock Exchange. |
| 1 | On 15 March 1999 the contract size was lowered from kr. 100,000 to kr. 10,000 kr. For comparability, 1999 figures for both contract sizes have been constructed. |
The DN Inquiry and Transfer System is the Nationalbank's RTGS[1] system in which krone payments are settled individually and registered immediately[2]. This system is used primarily for large payments. The number of transactions has been relatively stable in recent years, while the average transaction size is still increasing.
The sum clearing system handles retail payments via e.g. Dankort (debit card), cheques and BetalingsService (direct debit). The system is owned by the Danish Bankers' Association and operated by PBS. The sum clearing system is a net settlement system. PBS calculates the net positions of the banks vis-à-vis each other, and the amounts are settled via the banks' accounts with the Nationalbank. Far more transactions pass through the sum clearing system than through the DN Inquiry and Transfer System, but the individual payments are considerably smaller. The number of transactions is increasing steadily, while the average transaction size remains relatively constant at approximately kr. 5,000.
The VP System is the system of VP A/S - The Danish Securities Centre, for settlement of trades and other securities transactions. At fixed times each day the participants' net positions in terms of both securities and money are calculated. Net positions in securities are exchanged between the participants' VP safekeeping accounts, while net positions in money are exchanged via accounts with the Nationalbank. The number of trading transactions in VP increased significantly from 1999 to 2000. Especially the number of share trades has increased, while the number of bond trades has generally remained stable. As share trades are typically considerably smaller than bond trades, the average traded amount fell from 1999 to 2000.
Trades in options and futures are settled by the FUTOP Clearing Centre via accounts with the Nationalbank. The system used for settlement was restructured in November 2000, so that trade in and clearing of Danish futures and options now takes place in the Swedish derivatives system. Net positions calculated in the Swedish system are settled by the Danish participants and the FUTOP Clearing Centre using the DN Inquiry and Transfer System. The restructuring of the FUTOP system was related to the steadily decreasing turnover in the Danish derivatives market.
Danish banks can effect payments in euro via several payment systems, depending on the type of payment.
Retail euro transactions can be settled via the sum clearing with separate calculation of the banks' net positions in euro. Sum clearing in euro adheres to the same principles as in kroner, but the turnover in euro is moderate compared to the turnover in kroner. Sum clearing has only domestic participants, and it is therefore not possible to settle cross- border retail payments in euro.
Securities trading in euro is handled via the VP System. As for sum clearing, trades in euro are settled according to the same principles as trades in krone. The volume of transactions in euro is relatively moderate. Cross-border securities trades may be settled in VP via VP's links to securities centres abroad.
Debes and Target
Cross-border payments in euro can be processed in TARGET[3], the joint euro-denominated payment system
interlinking the 15 national EU central banks and the European Central Bank. TARGET interlinks the national RTGS
systems in Denmark's case, DEBES. DEBES may also be used for domestic euro transfers between Danish banks.
The TARGET system has been in operation for two years. Use of the system increased steadily throughout 1999 and 2000, with regard to both the number of transactions and total transaction value, cf. Table 8. The TARGET system has made it easier to process large cross-border payments and has become the standard system for such payments.
Table 8 Transaction volumes in Target and Debes
| Daily average | 1999 | 2000 |
| TARGET | ||
| Number of transactions | 163,157 | 188,157 |
| - Of which cross-border, per cent | 18 | 21 |
| Value of transactions, euro billion | 925 | 1,033 |
| - Of which cross-border, per cent | 39 | 42 |
| Of which DEBES | ||
| Number of transactions | 236 | 314 |
| - Of which cross-border, per cent | 92 | 94 |
| Value of transactions, euro billion | 4.8 | 5.7 |
| - Of which cross-border, per cent | 98 | 98 |
| Source: | ECB. |
In overall terms, less than half of the transaction volume in TARGET relates to cross-border payments, as the system is also used for domestic payments in euro. This average conceals considerable variation among the EU member states, where the use of TARGET varies greatly according to their need to process domestic payments in euro and the existence of alternative euro payment systems. In Denmark's case, TARGET/DEBES is used predominantly for cross-border payments. The same applies to the other member states that do not participate in the euro, while the large EU member states which have adopted the euro use the TARGET system for domestic payments in euro to a very large extent.
The central banks are improving the TARGET system on an ongoing basis. In November 2000 the system was thus adapted to the new transparency directive requirements in connection with cross-border customer payments[4].
In order to improve the participants' access to information on the status of the national RTGS systems interfaced with TARGET, a new information tool was introduced on 23 October 2000. Participants can now retrieve electronic information on subcomponents of TARGET e.g. whether the national RTGS systems are open or closed, or on any problems and when they are expected to be solved. This information tool supplements, but does not replace, the existing national communication channels.
In the first two years, TARGET's opening and closing days were fixed on a year-to-year basis. Now a long-term TARGET calendar has been introduced. TARGET is closed on Saturdays and Sundays, New Year's Day, Good Friday, Easter Monday, 1 May, Christmas Day and Boxing Day. An innovation is that the national RTGS systems must now be closed on TARGET closing days.
Target reimbursement scheme
On 1 January 2001 a new reimbursement scheme for TARGET participants was introduced. This is a requirement if a
payment order cannot be effected on the day it is issued due to problems in the TARGET system, so that participants
are forced to place funds with or borrow from their national central banks. The reimbursement scheme means that
participants are reimbursed for any additional costs incurred from placing funds with or borrowing from their central
bank, rather than in the money market.
For TARGET participants from non-euro-area EU member states the upper limit to interest on overnight deposits is abolished. If participants have an overnight deposit which is larger than the amount on which interest is normally payable owing to the TARGET system being down interest is payable on the entire deposit. The additional interest normally payable for overnight overdrafts at the Nationalbank is also disregarded.
The reimbursement scheme is described in the publication Documentation Basis for Payment Systems in Euro (in Danish), which can be downloaded from the Nationalbank's Web site.
Cross-border collateral
The EU central banks extend credit only against full collateral. In order to facilitate the provision of collateral in e.g.
TARGET, the EU central banks and the ECB have built up the correspondent central banking model, CCBM, for
cross-border provision of collateral. Cross-border collateral means collateral in assets placed in another country than
where the credit is granted. Within the EU, cross-border collateral is provided mainly via CCBM. In the longer run
there are plans to abolish CCBM, on condition that cross-border collateral can be provided effectively in another way.
One option might be links between securities centres. By the close of 2000 the EU central banks and the ECB had
approved 64 links between EU securities centres as suitable for provision of euro-credit collateral. An alternative
solution would be to actually consolidate securities centres. The high degree of consolidation among the European
securities centres continued in 2000, cf. p. 61.
In the spring of 2001 the European Commission is expected to present a draft collateral directive. The directive will improve the framework for cross-border provision of collateral within the EU. The proposed directive will enhance the provisions for protection in the Directive on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems[5] to include bilateral outstandings.
The Nationalbank is developing a new RTGS system, KRONOS, which is expected to be ready in the 4th quarter of 2001. KRONOS will replace both the DN Inquiry and Transfer System[6], which dates from 1981, and DEBES. The banks will thus gain a combined krone and euro payment system.
KRONOS will be the participants' home banking system at the Nationalbank. Participants (banks and mortgage-credit institutes, stockbroking companies, etc.) can send payments in kroner to other participants in Denmark, or payments in euro to TARGET participants in Denmark and elsewhere in Europe, on an ongoing basis. Participants will also be able to transfer funds between their own accounts with the Nationalbank and to view statements of account, queued payments, news, etc. on-line.
Participants will be able to send payments via a Web-enabled graphic user interface on their own PCs or via SWIFT[7]. This makes it easier to integrate KRONOS with the participants' own payment systems.
KRONOS will include a number of functions giving participants better liquidity-management facilities than the present systems. Payments are queued automatically if there are insufficient funds to effect them. When the disposable amount is increased, the queue is automatically checked and payments are effected. It will also be possible to submit orders for later payment. In addition, a mechanism will be introduced to facilitate payments settlement in situations where liquidity is tight (a gridlock solution). Several other RTGS systems in TARGET have introduced similar mechanisms.
KRONOS will meet the requirements which the future international currency settlement system, CLS, sets for acceptance of a currency. The Danish krone is expected to be included in CLS. A description of CLS is presented in the 1998 Annual Report p. 79.
The central banks' international work in the field of payment systems during the past decade has focused particularly on promoting safety and efficiency in payment systems.[8]
In June 2000 the central banks of the G-10 countries published the final version of a report on safety and efficiency in payment systems, Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems [9]. The report sets out ten Core Principles for systemically important payment systems and four principles for the role and responsibility of the central banks in this respect.
The Core Principles report is an update of the Lamfalussy report, which is the basis for assessment of payment system risks in most parts of the world and is a benchmark for the objectives to be met by payment systems. The new Core Principles extend further than the Lamfalussy standards. For example, they focus on issues such as management structures and payment system efficiency. The report concentrates on payment systems, but the G-10 central banks are working with the IOSCO[10] to prepare an equivalent report for securities settlement systems[11].
More than 100 central banks worldwide, including the Nationalbank, have adopted the standards and are working to implement them.[12]The standards are also parameters of the IMF's Financial Sector Assessment Program, cf. p. 90ff.
[1] RTGS = Real-Time Gross Settlement.
[2] For a more detailed description of the types of payment systems, see Danmarks Nationalbank, Annual Report and Accounts 1998, p. 75.
[3] Trans-european Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system.
[4] EC Directive 97/5/EC on cross-border credit transfers.
[5] European Parliament and Council directive 98/26/EC of 19 May 1998. The directive was implemented in Denmark with effect from 1 May 2000 (Act no. 283 of 26 April 2000).
[6] In addition to payment elements which will be replaced by KRONOS, the DN Inquiry and Transfer System comprises a number of other functions, e.g. securitised lending, which will be retained in the DN Inquiry and Transfer System.
[7] SWIFT = Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication.
[8] The role of the central banks in this connection is called oversight. BIS defines oversight as a central bank task, principally intended to promote the smooth functioning of payment systems and to protect the financial system against possible 'domino effects' which may occur when one or more participants in the payment system incur credit or liquidity problems. Payment systems oversight aims at a given system (e.g. a funds transfer system) rather than individual participants." Oversight of payment systems is part of the central banks' general work to ensure financial stability.
[9] The Report can be downloaded from www.bis.org.
[10] International Organisation of Securities Commissions, the international cooperation between a number of authorities responsible for supervising securities markets.
[11] In January 2001 G-10/IOSCO submitted a draft report for consultation. The draft report can be downloaded from www.bis.org.
[12] For further discussion of the standards see Tobias Thygesen, International Standards for Payment Systems, Danmarks Nationalbank, Monetary Review, 1st Quarter 2001.
The bill to adopt the euro was rejected by the referendum in Denmark on 28 September. Denmark's fixed-exchange-rate policy is maintained within the framework of ERM II.
As from 1 January 2001 Greece joined the euro area, so that 12 EU member states have now adopted the euro. Since euro banknotes and coins will be put into circulation on 1 January 2002, the full changeover to the euro takes place in 2001.
In 2000 the demand for IMF credit declined in view of the higher growth in the global economy and stabilisation of the balances of payments of the emerging market economies. Instead, the IMF concentrated on more long-term reforms of its surveillance and emergency relief.
In March 2000 the Danish Prime Minister called a referendum for 28 September on Denmark's adoption of the euro, and in May the government submitted the bill.
According to the bill, if the outcome of the referendum was in favour of adoption of the euro, Denmark would be able to join the euro area as from 1 January 2002. Euro banknotes and coins would be introduced as from 1 January 2004, after which krone banknotes and coins would be withdrawn.
The Nationalbank and the financial sector would have been required to undertake a major technical restructuring up to the introduction of the euro.[1] Other sectors in society would also have been required to adjust to the euro, but this changeover would not have had to take place until the introduction of euro banknotes and coins.
The bill was rejected by the referendum, with 53 per cent of the votes against the adoption of the euro, and 47 per cent in favour. Immediately thereafter the Danish Government and the Nationalbank issued a joint press release in which it was stated that Denmark's fixed-exchange-rate policy would be maintained within the framework of the narrow fluctuation band of ERM II, the exchange-rate mechanism of the EU.
The euro was introduced in 11 EU member states[2] on 1 January 1999. On 1 January 2001 the euro was also adopted in Greece. The national central banks of the 12 euro area member states, together with the ECB, constitute the Eurosystem[3]. Box 8 presents a description of the ECB's organisation.
Box 8 The organisation of the ECB
The European Central Bank, ECB, has three governing bodies: the Executive Board, the Governing Council and the General Council. The Executive Board is responsible for the day-to-day running of the ECB, and the implementation of the monetary-policy decisions. Wim Duisenberg is President of the Executive Board which consists of six members in total.
Monetary-policy decisions are taken by the ECB's Governing Council consisting of the central-bank governors of the 12 participating member states, and of the ECB's Executive Board. The Governing Council normally meets every two weeks. The practical execution of the decisions of the Governing Council is predominantly the responsibility of the participating national central banks. The weekly liquidity allotment is a case in point. Should the Governing Council fail to reach agreement the main rule according to the EU Treaty is that the Governing Council's voting procedure shall be by simple majority, whereby each member has one vote. In view of the enlargement of the EU the procedure for amending the voting provisions has been simplified, cf. p. 88f.
The General Council consists of the President and Vice President of the Executive Board, as well as the governors of the central banks of all 15 EU member states, including Danmarks Nationalbank. The General Council normally meets briefly every quarter. During 2000 the General Council discussed such issues as the functioning of ERM II, the monetary development in the EU member states not participating in the euro area and the ECB's convergence report on Sweden and Greece.
The ECB has 13 committees and subcommittees in which the national central banks and the ECB participate. The national central banks of the EU member states outside the euro area participate only to a limited extent. The Nationalbank's participation in these meetings varies considerably. The committees contribute expertise to the decision- making process within all relevant central-bank areas.
The ECB is owned by the national central banks, which have contributed capital. The capital contribution of each central bank depends on the member state's economy and population size. Each national central bank's share of the ECB corresponds to its contribution to the total capital. The ECB's profit or loss is distributed proportionally among the national central banks according to their ownership share.
The three EU central banks which are outside the Eurosystem, the Bank of England, Sveriges Riksbank and Danmarks Nationalbank, have paid up 5 per cent of the amount they would have contributed had they joined the Eurosystem. The interest on this amount covers the expenses related to the ECB tasks which concern all 15 member states.
Inclusion of Greece in the euro area
On the selection of the first euro area member states in May 1998 Greece did not fulfil the economic criteria for
participation, the convergence criteria. Since then, however, Greece has achieved a higher degree of economic
convergence with the euro area member states. Against this background, in the spring of 2000 Greece applied to join
the euro area. The ECB and the European Commission each prepared a convergence report on Greece, pointing out
such factors as the significant reduction of the Greek inflation rate (CPI) from 20.4 per cent in 1990 to 4.8 per cent in
1998, and 2.6 per cent in 1999. The European Commission's report concluded that Greece now fulfilled the
convergence criteria for full participation in the third stage of EMU.
In connection with the European Council in Portugal in June the ECOFIN Council approved Greek participation in the euro area as from 1 January 2001. At the same time, Greece was granted immediate access to participate in the meetings of the ECB and the Eurogroup, which is the informal forum for the Ministers of Economic Affairs and Finance of the euro area member states. At the same time, the ECOFIN Council fixed the conversion rate between the Greek drachma and the euro as from 1 January 2001. The conversion rate was fixed as the drachma's existing central rate in ERM II. When Greece joined the euro area on 1 January 2001, the drachma's exchange rate was thus fixed irrevocably at 340.750 drachma per euro.
The last leg of the changeover
In 2001 banknotes and coins are still denominated in the euro area member states' national currencies (D-mark, French
francs, Finnish marks, and so on). It is possible to hold accounts and transact electronic payments in euro in connection
with e.g. securities trading.
Until 1 January 2002, when euro banknotes and coins are put into circulation, the national currencies are to be regarded as various sub-denominations of the euro. For example, the D-mark is exactly 1/1.95583 euro[4].
The financial markets in the euro area already use the euro, while private individuals in the euro area have encountered the euro via e.g. price tags in both the national currency and euro. As from the beginning of 2002 all areas of society in the euro area must be ready to use the euro, even for day-to-day transactions. In 2001 very extensive information campaigns will therefore be launched in the euro area in order to prepare citizens for the changeover. In most euro area member states during the last two weeks of 2001 the general public will be offered start kits containing euro banknotes and coins.
The euro banknotes will be identical throughout the euro area, while the coins will have a common and a national side. All participating member states have published the design of the national side of their euro coins. The final design and security features of the banknotes will be published from September 2001. There will be 7 different euro banknotes (5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 and 500 euro), and 8 different euro coins (1, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 50 cent, as well as 1 and 2 euro). Up to 1 January 2002, when the first euro banknotes and coins are put into circulation, around 15 billion euro banknotes and 50 billion euro coins are to be manufactured.
For a short transition period of up to two months after 1 January 2002 there will be dual circulation of euro banknotes and coins alongside banknotes and coins denominated in national currencies. By 1 March 2002 at the latest the last national banknotes and coins will be withdrawn from circulation, and from this date at the latest they will no longer be legal tender. After this date business entities will only be obliged to accept payment in euro. However, after the expiry of the transition period national banknotes and coins may still be exchanged at the banks of the participating member states (for a few months) and at their central banks (for many years).
The period up to the introduction of the euro banknotes and coins will present the major task of transporting euro banknotes and coins to the banks. As from September 2001 the banks will be able to receive euro banknotes and coins in order to build up the necessary initial stocks. The retail sector will also be able to receive euro banknotes and coins before the transition period begins.
Significance to EU cooperation
Economic-policy issues have gained a more prominent role in EU cooperation after the changeover to the euro and the
single monetary policy.
With regard to economic-policy cooperation, Denmark is a full member of the ECOFIN Council where all formal decisions are made. However, a steadily increasing proportion of the discussions, e.g. the exchange of views on economic trends, now takes place within the informal forum for the Ministers of Economic Affairs and Finance of the euro area member states, the Eurogroup.
The Eurogroup has gradually gained a stronger role, and has now also become more visible by holding press conferences and issuing press releases. Furthermore, the number of issues on the agenda at meetings is planned to be increased in order to enhance the coordination of economic policy in the euro area. When a non-participating member state has the EU presidency, the next member state to have the EU presidency will serve as President of the Eurogroup. During the Swedish EU presidency in the first half of 2001 Belgium is President of the Eurogroup, since the EU presidency passes to Belgium in the second half of 2001.
Two other EU member states besides Denmark, the UK and Sweden, do not participate in the euro area. The EU is negotiating membership with 12 countries. When these countries join the EU they will not be able to introduce the euro until they have participated in ERM II for a period.
The UK
Like Denmark, the UK has invoked its Treaty-bound right not to participate in the third stage of EMU. The British
government has reserved the right to participate at a later stage if this is found to be economically beneficial to the UK.
The government has prepared five economic tests to be passed before a decision on participation can be made. For
example, sustained convergence must be achieved between the UK economy and the economies of the euro area, and
the implications to the financial sector should be evaluated. According to the British government the economic tests will
be assessed at the latest two years after the next parliamentary election, which must be held by May 2002.
Furthermore, the British government has stated that participation must be endorsed by referendum.
Sweden
In Sweden the Riksdag (Parliament) in December 1997 adopted the government's recommendation that Sweden does
not participate in the third stage of EMU from the start. The Riksdag also adopted the decision that practical
preparations for the euro should be made in all sectors of society in order to preserve Sweden's scope for manoeuvre
should it decide to participate at a later date.
At the extraordinary congress of the Social Democratic Party in March 2000 the party confirmed that it wished Sweden to participate in the euro, but from a later date. Like the UK, the timing of Sweden's participation will depend on when it is assessed to be economically beneficial. In this connection the government has set out certain criteria. These include a certain convergence between economic development in Sweden and the euro area. Sweden's Prime Minister has stated that there will be no referendum on Sweden's participation in the euro before the next elections to the Riksdag in September 2002.
In the spring of 2000 the European Commission and the European Central Bank conducted a convergence assessment of Sweden. The European Commission finds that Sweden fulfils all of the economic criteria for participation in the euro area, apart from the exchange-rate criterion, since the Swedish krona does not participate in ERM II. The Swedish government has stated that linking the Swedish krona to ERM II will be a logical initial step if Sweden decides to adopt the euro.
The candidate countries
12 countries from central and eastern Europe and the Mediterranean area have initiated accession negotiations with the
EU[5]. The EU initiated negotiations with Cyprus, Estonia, Poland, Slovenia, the Czech Republic and Hungary in
March 1998, and with Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Romania and Slovakia in February 2000.
No official date for the first enlargement has been fixed. However, at the European Council in Nice in December 2000 there were hopes that the first new EU member states would be able to participate in the next elections to the European Parliament in 2004. The conclusion of the European Commission's annual progress report on the accession process from November 2000 is that Cyprus, Estonia, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, the Czech Republic and Hungary are ahead in fulfilling the accession requirements. They are followed by Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia, while the accession process for Bulgaria and Romania will probably be longer.
On accession to the EU these countries will be given the status of derogation countries in the Economic and Monetary Union, EMU. This implies that they will not introduce the euro from the start. In the longer term the countries will be under an obligation to introduce the euro on condition of fulfilment of the convergence criteria for participation in the third stage of EMU. In accordance with one of the criteria the countries are expected to participate in the exchange-rate mechanism, ERM II, for at least two years prior to introduction of the euro. The ECOFIN Council has stated that ERM II is a flexible arrangement providing in principle for participation with e.g. a currency board if this is found to function satisfactorily[6]. Floating exchange rates, crawling pegs and fixed-exchange-rate regimes vis-à-vis other currencies than the euro are found to be incompatible with ERM II. The ECOFIN Council has also stated that unilateral introduction of the euro by means of currency substitution ("euroisation") is incompatible with the spirit of the Treaty's EMU provisions.
The European Council in Nice on 7-9 December 2000 concluded the intergovernmental conference. The objective of the intergovernmental conference was a revision of the Treaty provisions concerning the composition and functioning of the EU institutions in view of the future enlargement of the EU. The principal conclusions of the intergovernmental conference concerned the size and composition of the European Commission, the weighting of votes in the EU Council, the extension of qualified majority voting and review of the provisions on closer cooperation. The new Treaty requires ratification in all 15 member states before it can enter into force.
Among the results of the intergovernmental conference was that each member state shall have one commissioner as from 2005 until the EU membership comprises 27 member states. On the admission of the 27th EU member state, a rotation system according to an equality principle will be introduced, so that the first commission to be appointed hereafter shall have fewer members than the number of member states.
Another result was that the weighting of votes, as well as the decision-making procedure in the EU Council, were amended in several respects. Further provisions for closer cooperation among a group of member states within certain areas were introduced. Under the new Treaty, legal instruments based on approximately 30 EU Treaty provisions now require qualified majority voting rather than the previous unanimity procedure. A single amendment concerning the ECB was made to the ESCB Statute annexed as a protocol to the Treaty. Amendment of the voting procedures in the Governing Council is now made easier under the new Treaty. The voting procedure may now be amended by the Council, meeting in the composition of the heads of state or government, acting unanimously on a recommendation from the European Commission or the ECB. Amendment of the Treaty is thus no longer required.
For the second consecutive year all EU member states comply with a Treaty requirement of a government budget deficit not exceeding 3 per cent of GDP. Budget surpluses are found in several member states, including Denmark, and no member states are close to the 3-per-cent limit.
The Stability and Growth Pact entered into force simultaneously with the introduction of the euro and imposes an obligation on all 15 EU member states to aim for a budgetary position "close to balance or in surplus in the medium term". This provision has been interpreted as a budgetary position sufficient to enable the member state to comply with the 3-per-cent limit, even in the event of a normal cyclical downturn. Each EU member state must prepare a national programme for compliance with the requirements set out in the Stability and Growth Pact in the following three years. The programmes are discussed by the ECOFIN Council, followed by the Council's opinion.
In May 2000 the ECOFIN Council completed its review of the updated programmes of all EU member states. With the exception of Austria all programmes were found to comply with the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact. The Austrian programme envisages a government budget deficit of 1.4 per cent of GDP in 2002, which was found to be insufficient to ensure that the 3-per-cent limit is not exceeded in the event of a cyclical slowdown.
The second review of the updated programmes began in November 2000. The ECOFIN Council's conclusion on the German programme was that Germany will not comply with the requirement of a government budgetary position "close to balance or in surplus in the medium term" until 2002. This is due to a temporary deterioration of Germany's government budget in 2001 in connection with the implementation of the tax reform.
In Ireland there is prospect of sound government budget surpluses in the coming years, in compliance with the requirements of the Stability and Growth Pact. However, the Irish economy is subject to very high growth rates, at 10 per cent in 2000, and inflation considerably above the EU average. In the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines adopted by the ECOFIN Council in June 2000, the Irish Government was encouraged to counter the risk of overheating. In December 2000 the Irish Government put forward a budget which e.g. via a number of tax cuts (from an already low tax level) would increase the demand pressure on the economy. On this basis, in February 2001 the ECOFIN Council adopted a recommendation to Ireland that the expansionary budget for 2001 would increase the risk of overheating and is in conflict with the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines.
The demand for IMF credit declined in 2000 due to accelerated growth in the global economy and stabilisation of the balances of payments of the emerging market economies. The IMF's liquidity also improved considerably as a result of the increase of the member countries' capital contributions (quotas) which entered into force in 1999.
In December 2000 the IMF approved a financing facility of SDR 8.7 billion to Turkey, and in January 2001 a financing facility of SDR 10.6 billion to Argentina.
After the financial crises of recent years the IMF's work in 2000 was concentrated on more long-term reforms to prevent financial crises, or limit their extent and scope, through improved surveillance and greater transparency in the member countries' economic policies.
Extension of the IMF's surveillance
The IMF and the World Bank have initiated a programme, the Financial Sector Assessment Program, FSAP, for early
detection of possible weaknesses in a country's financial system. The programme is also designed to strengthen the
coordination and efficiency of the financial cooperation between the two international institutions.
The IMF's contribution to the programme comprises:
The international standards comprise a code of good practice for transparency in monetary and financial policies, banking supervision principles, payment systems, securities trading and insurance supervision.
The cooperation between the IMF and the World Bank on FSAP is primarily directed at the emerging market economies. The IMF undertakes to assess the soundness of these countries' financial sectors within the framework of the IMF's annual article IV consultations. The IMF's assessment is based on macroeconomic relations and the overall stability of the economies. The World Bank prepares microeconomic assessments of the financial sectors of the emerging market economies, including their banking sectors, based on specific development problems.
The IMF has also initiated efforts to improve the surveillance of the countries' external vulnerabilities via assistance to enhance debt management as well as the management of the foreign-exchange reserves, analyses of capital-account issues, and improved statistics on foreign- exchange reserves and debt.
Involving the private sector in crisis prevention and resolution
The IMF's efforts to secure greater private-sector involvement in crisis prevention and resolution were initiated in
1997-98 when the IMF granted Thailand, Korea, Russia and Brazil very large loans which exceeded the IMF's access
limits. The real implication of the large IMF loans was that private creditors could terminate their credit and withdraw
without losses after granting credit at relatively high returns for a number of years. Against this background the aim is to
clarify to the authorities of the individual countries, as well as private lenders, that there are limits to the support given to
a country by the official community, including the IMF, in the event of a balance-of-payments crisis.
This issue is still being discussed within the IMF. However, agreement has been reached on the overall precondition that private-sector involvement must be ensured. Each time a country requires balance-of- payments support the IMF must therefore analyse and describe how the country has ensured the involvement of private creditors in the solution of its financial crisis.
Establishment of an independent evaluation unit
The meeting of the International Monetary and Financial Committee, IMFC, in April 2000, approved the establishment
of an evaluation unit to assess the IMF's work. The unit must be independent of the IMF's staff and management and
will report to the IMF's Executive Board. The evaluation unit is free to choose the aspects of the IMF's work to be
analysed and evaluated. The evaluation reports will be published. The unit can also have direct contact with e.g. NGOs
and other stakeholders, and is expected to become operational during the spring of 2001.
Simplification of the IMF's loan facilities
For some time the IMF's agenda has included simplification of the IMF's financing facilities, cf. Box 9, improvement of
the incentives for faster repayment of loans, and improvement of the access to assistance in the event of financial crises.
Box 9 The IMF's financing facilities
Over the years a number of financing facilities have been established, often special-purpose facilities. The number of facilities has become excessive, and the Executive Board has decided to simplify loan structures by abolishing a number of facilities which have not been used for some time. The purpose is to ensure equal treatment of the member countries that borrow from the IMF.
In order to avoid long-term utilisation of the IMF's facilities the repayment schemes have been tightened. If a borrowing country's balance of payments takes a favourable course, the country is expected to repay the borrowed funds sooner.
As regards pricing of the IMF's facilities, the Executive Board also decided to raise the rate of interest for the proportion of a country's total debt to the IMF exceeding 200 per cent of the country's quota. Furthermore, the commitment fees have now been harmonised for all facilities.
In 1999 a new contingency facility, Contingent Credit Lines, CCL, for countries with a sound economic policy that are threatened by circumstances beyond their control, was established. CCL has proved to be too expensive compared to other credit facilities, so that interest rates and commitment fees were reduced.
IMF facilities for low-income countries the debt initiative, HIPC,
and PRGF (poverty reduction and growth facility)
At the joint annual meeting of the World Bank and the IMF in 1999 it was decided to implement an enhanced debt
relief initiative, whereby debt relief is linked to the developing countries' own efforts to combat poverty, cf. the 1999
Annual Report, pp. 91-92. The countries receiving assistance under this facility must prepare a programme for
economic policy and reforms in which a poverty reduction strategy plays an important role.
Once a country has obtained a debt-relief commitment financial assistance will be subject to surveillance of its compliance with the economic programme and the poverty reduction strategy. Debt relief is effected on condition of satisfactory compliance with the programme for up to three years. However, the country may obtain debt relief sooner by implementing the reforms more quickly than expected.
At the annual meeting in the autumn of 2000, the World Bank and the IMF agreed to speed up the process, so as to enable most poor and heavily indebted countries to obtain debt relief before the end of 2000. It was also decided to keep the HIPC initiative open until the end of 2002. This provides access for countries which have not yet qualified for debt relief due to military conflicts or for other reasons.
[1] See p. 113f for a brief account of the Nationalbank's preparations for the changeover, and p. 74 for further details of the preliminary design of Danish euro coins.
[2] These are Belgium, Finland, France, Netherlands, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain, Germany and Austria.
[3] The Treaty uses the term the European System of Central Banks (ESCB), which in some contexts comprises the ECB and the national central banks of all 15 EU member states, and in others only the ECB and the national central banks of the euro area member states. The ECB introduced the Eurosystem as the name of the central-bank structure under which the ESCB carries out the tasks related to the third stage of EMU.
[4] The exchange rates between the national currencies and the euro were fixed on 31 December 1998 for the first 11 participating member states, cf. Table 13, p. 173.
[5] At the Helsinki European Council in December 1999 Turkey was also accepted as a candidate country, although accession negotiations have not yet been initiated.
[6] Participation in ERM II with a currency board will constitute a unilateral obligation on the part of the country in question, whereby the ECB has no other obligations than those specified in the existing ERM II agreement. Currency boards are described in further detail in Ulrik Bie and Niels Peter Hahnemann, Currency Boards, Danmarks Nationalbank, Monetary Review, 2nd Quarter 2000.
Danmarks Nationalbank is in the process of expanding the Danish financial statistics. This is related to the efforts within especially the EU to standardise the member states' statistics. Danmarks Nationalbank and Statistics Denmark have also intensified their cooperation on improving the quality of the Danish balance-of-payments statistics.
The Nationalbank's work in the area of financial statistics has been stepped up considerably since the autumn of 1999 when the Nationalbank concluded an agreement in principle with Statistics Denmark to take over the responsibility for expanding the Danish financial statistics in accordance with international guidelines, cf. the 1999 Annual Report p. 100. In the spring of 2000 this agreement was followed by a cooperation agreement between Statistics Denmark and the Nationalbank in the statistics area, and an amendment of the Statistics Denmark Act giving the Nationalbank the formal authority to collate financial statistics.
The need to expand the financial statistics is based particularly on the cooperation within the EU and the transition to the single currency, which requires a comprehensive picture of the economic and financial development in the individual countries and within the entire EU and euro area. National statistics are therefore being harmonised, so that member states' economic and financial statistical reporting to Eurostat, the statistical body of the European Commission, and the ECB, is brought on a comparable footing.
The compilation principles for the financial statistics are determined by the ECB together with the national central banks on the basis of a report on statistical requirements for stage three of EMU[1] published in 1996 by the EMI, the predecessor of the ECB.
Even though Denmark has not adopted the euro the Nationalbank participates in the ECB's statistical collaboration on an equal footing with the other central banks and must observe the guidelines on EU member states' financial statistical reporting to the ECB.
In addition to new balance-sheet statistics for monetary financial institutions, MFIs, introduced in the autumn of 2000, the expansion of the financial statistics will include such areas as securities statistics, interest-rate statistics, statistics for investment associations and the preparation of quarterly financial accounts for the key sectors of the economy.
As a consequence, in the years to come the Danish financial sector must expect to spend more resources on generating the necessary reporting basis for the expansion of financial statistics.
Balance-sheet statistics for the MFI sector
Since 1998 the Nationalbank has worked with the trade organisations in the financial sector, the Danish Financial
Supervisory Authority and Statistics Denmark on introducing new balance-sheet statistics for Danish MFIs, i.e. the
Nationalbank, banks and mortgage-credit institutes, other credit institutions and money-market funds. This work was
completed in October 2000, when regular reporting commenced. Reporting guidelines and forms have been
coordinated among the relevant authorities so that financial statistical reporting to the various bodies is integrated into
one system administered by the Nationalbank.
The new balance-sheet statistics for MFIs[2], which replace the former monthly balance-sheet statistics for banks and mortgage-credit institutes, have been published since the beginning of 2001. The MFI statistics differ from the former balance-sheet statistics for banks and mortgage- credit institutes in a number of respects. For example, the balance-sheet items are compiled at market value, in contrast to book value as before, and the distribution by sector, maturity, currency and country is far more detailed than in the former statistics. To give a comprehensive view of balance-sheet trends within the MFI sector, the Nationalbank has prepared and published[3] comparable historical data from 1991.
Interest-rate statistics
Interest-rate statistics vary greatly among the EU member states, in terms of both method of calculation and coverage.
The ECB is therefore working with the national central banks to prepare new, harmonised interest-rate statistics. The
purpose is to establish an improved basis for analysis of the monetary transmission mechanism, and furthermore, when
combined with the balance-sheet statistics for MFIs, to achieve a better insight on the development in the financial
structure in the EU and the euro area.
The interest-rate statistics will comprise the MFI sector's deposits from and lending to households and non-financial companies by instrument type and maturity. To a great extent they will correspond to the balance- sheet statistics for MFIs. The details of the new interest-rate statistics in the EU member states will probably be determined in the 2nd half of 2001, with reporting from the start of 2003.
The introduction of the interest-rate statistics in Denmark will provide a considerably more detailed picture of the development in the interest rates of the MFI sector than the present quarterly interest-rate statistics. Once the precise content is determined, the Nationalbank will establish a working group with representatives from the trade organisations of the financial sector, the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority and Statistics Denmark in order to prepare the introduction of the statistics in Denmark.
Securities statistics
Securities statistics are also given high priority internationally. This is mainly due to a need to improve the compilation of
cross-border portfolio investments. At present there is a considerable degree of asymmetry between the national
statistics, owing to major variations in collection and compilation methods. Detailed statistics on securities portfolios and
securities issues will also be an important supplement to the MFI statistics, and a necessary prerequisite for the
compilation of financial sector accounts, cf. p. 97. In the longer term the International Monetary Fund, IMF, plans to
establish a global securities database, based on either national data or data from international institutions. The ECB is
also active in this respect. By the end of 2001 the ECB aims to establish a European securities database, based
primarily on information from the EU central banks.
The Nationalbank, VP A/S - The Danish Securities Centre and Statistics Denmark are working together to establish a similar database for Denmark by the end of 2001. This securities database will be based on monthly reports giving detailed information on the individual securities issued by Danish companies in Denmark and abroad. In the longer run, the database will also include information on holders of securities. Most of this information is already registered by VP A/S - The Danish Securities Centre. However, in certain areas additional information will have to be compiled, first and foremost data on the issue of securities abroad by Danish companies and financial institutions. Regular collection of such information directly from the relevant parties is planned to start in the 1st half of 2001. Later on, it may also be necessary to collate information on ownership from the institutions administering the securities on behalf of customers.
Investment associations
The strong growth in the assets managed by investment associations in recent years has increased the macroeconomic
necessity of adequate statistics for this area. The Nationalbank, the Federation of Danish Investment Associations,
Statistics Denmark and the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority have therefore decided to expand the existing
statistics for investment associations. These statistics will be based on the MFI statistics template, but they will be less
detailed. Initial reporting will take place in July 2001 on the basis of information from the 2nd quarter.
The ECB is likewise working to establish EU statistics for investment associations. In most other EU member states too they account for the majority of "other financial intermediates than MFIs".
Financial account
A financial account gives a comprehensive view of the financial assets and liabilities of a sector at the time of compilation
and of the financial transactions during the period in question. It is used for e.g. economic analyses and forecasts. Unlike
other financial statistics, which are based on reporting from the financial sector, the preparation of annual and quarterly
financial accounts is based on the compilation and analysis of existing statistics from other sources, including MFI
balance sheets, capital-account and securities statistics.
Both Statistics Denmark and the Nationalbank are establishing a financial account for the key sectors of the Danish economy. The responsibility for the annual financial account lies with Statistics Denmark under the regulation on the European System of Integrated Economic Accounts. Except for accounts for the government sector, the Nationalbank is responsible for the preparation of the quarterly financial account. The Nationalbank intends to publish the first quarterly financial account in 2002, comprising the period from 1997 to 2001.
Survey of the foreign-exchange and derivatives markets
Since 1989, the Bank for International Settlements, BIS, has conducted surveys of the foreign-exchange and derivatives
markets every three years. The most recent survey took place in 1998[4].
The next survey is due to take place in 2001, with the participation of the Nationalbank and 49 other central banks. The contributions of the individual central banks are based on information collected from the largest national market players. The survey will comprise two elements. The first is the trading volume in April 2001 in both the foreign-exchange market and the markets for currency and interest-rate derivatives. The second is information related to outstanding business as of end-June in currency, gold, interest-rate, share, commodity and credit derivatives.
The Nationalbank expects to publish the results of the survey in the autumn of 2001.
The basis for the compilation of Denmark's external balance of payments is prepared jointly by Statistics Denmark and the Nationalbank. The Nationalbank compiles and publishes information relating to payments between Denmark and other countries, i.e. the payments statistics. This information, together with the foreign-trade statistics, etc., is included in the balance of payments prepared and published by Statistics Denmark.
Information related to external payments is sourced mainly from the banks via an electronic reporting system introduced in October 1998[5]. For payments in excess of a certain threshold not only the amount, but also the purpose is reported. This threshold was originally kr. 60,000, but was raised to kr. 100,000 from 1 January 2001. Since payments below this threshold are reported collectively, the increase has reduced the number of reported payments significantly and eased the reporting burden for banks and companies.
The introduction of the Nationalbank's new electronic reporting system has created a good basis for cooperation between Statistics Denmark and the Nationalbank with a view to improving the quality of the balance-of-payments statistics. For example, it is now possible to compare the foreign-trade statistics on companies' external trade in goods with payment statistics on payments for goods. A survey based on comparisons in selected periods of 1999 and 2000 was completed in June 2000.[6] Comparisons will continue and are to be expanded to cover services, whereby the payments statistics will be compared with other relevant statistics.
Parallel hereto, the Nationalbank has conducted a survey of transit payments in the payments statistics during the period from January 1999 to March 2000. This survey led to a minor redistribution of respectively goods and services payments and will be repeated at intervals. The Nationalbank intends to conduct similar surveys of selected areas. This applies particularly to areas where no effective payments are made, e.g. when companies set off receivables against amounts payable.
From time to time it is also necessary to conduct a more exhaustive assessment of the robustness of the reporting system in relation to the development in the financial markets in general, and the payment patterns in particular. The trend in other EU member states is to phase out the payments-based data collection systems in favour of collecting balance-of-payments information directly from companies. The reporting systems of many countries are outdated, and the balance-of-payments statistics inadequate. Furthermore, the single market and the euro are expected to lead to greater financial integration within the EU, so that it will probably become more and more common for business enterprises to effect payments via foreign banks. This will make it even more difficult for individual central banks to collect data on cross-border payments via the banking system. Finally, Eurostat and the ECB are seeking to harmonise the collection of statistics on the balance of payments of the member states in order to achieve consistency in the overall balance-of-payments statistics for the EU and the euro area. This will also accommodate the wishes of many large European companies for more uniform reporting procedures in the member states. In due course these factors will amplify the present trend for the collection of the balance-of-payments information directly from companies.
Compared to other countries, the payments statistics of the Nationalbank are based on a relatively new reporting system. It has thus been possible from the outset to avoid some of the weaknesses seen elsewhere. It is obvious that the system will eventually come under pressure as a consequence of changing payment patterns. This is one reason that Statistics Denmark and the Nationalbank have embarked on a joint project to establish a basis for assessing any weaknesses in the present reporting system and the need, some years on, to restructure the compilation of the balance-of-payments data. The aim is to achieve balance-of-payments statistics of the best quality possible, as well as a rational compilation method.
[1] Statistical Requirements for Stage Three of Monetary Union (Implementation Package), EMI, July 1996. The requirements are described in more detail in the document Statistical Information Collected and Compiled by the ESCB, ECB, May 2000, which can be seen at www.ecb.int.
[2] For a more detailed description of the balance-sheet statistics for the MFI sector, see Kjeld Ole Nielsen and Anders Mølgaard Pedersen, New Balance-Sheet Statistics for Monetary Financial Institutions, Danmarks Nationalbank, Monetary Review, 4th Quarter 1999.
[3] See Financial Statistics Special Reports, No. 1, 14 February 2001.
[4] See Henning Dalgaard, Survey of the Foreign-Exchange Market and the Markets for Financial Derivatives in 1998, Danmarks Nationalbank, Monetary Review, 4th Quarter 1998, and Financial Statistics Special Reports, No. 4, 30 November 1998.
[5] See Lasse Tryde, The Nationalbank's New Reporting System for Payments Statistics, Danmarks Nationalbank, Monetary Review, 2nd Quarter 1999.
[6] Report on the Project to Improve the External-Trade and Payments Statistics (in Danish), published by Statistics Denmark, June 2000. The survey is also described in the article Comparison of Goods Trade and Goods Payments, Danmarks Nationalbank, Monetary Review, 3rd Quarter 2000.
The announcement of the referendum on Denmark's adoption of the euro had a significant impact on the work of most departments of Danmarks Nationalbank. Prior to the referendum an internal EMU contingency plan was prepared. It identified a number of projects, especially relating to IT, to be implemented should the result of the referendum be in favour of Denmark's adoption of the euro.
In 2000, the Joint Consultation Committee adopted a personnel policy drawn up by a committee comprising managerial and staff representatives.
At the close of 2000 the Nationalbank had 605 employees, equivalent to 552 full-time positions.
The Nationalbank has a number of objectives and values, which are the guidelines for its day-to-day activities. Both the objectives and the values have been drawn up in close cooperation between management and employees, and they form the basis for the individual departments' work on objectives and action plans.
Objectives
The overall objectives of the Nationalbank as an independent and credible institution are:
Values
Personnel policy
In 2000 the Joint Consultation Committee adopted a personnel policy drawn up by a committee comprising
managerial and staff representatives. The personnel policy comprises a set of values which expand on and
supplement the Nationalbank's standpoints. The personnel policy covers all employees, who are all expected to
live up to and act in accordance with the policy. Managers hold staff responsibilities and are thus subject to a
special obligation to implement the personnel policy.
The Royal Bank Commissioner
The Royal Bank Commissioner is the formal link between the Government and the Nationalbank. The Minister
for Economic Affairs and for Nordic Cooperation Ms. Marianne Jelved is the Royal Bank Commissioner.
Board of Directors
The Board of Directors has 25 members, of whom 8 are elected by the Folketing (Parliament) from among its
members, and 2 are appointed by the Minister for Economic Affairs. The other 15 members, who must have
in-depth knowledge of business conditions, are elected by the Board of Directors and should represent different
geographical areas and professions, including wage-earners. Meetings are normally held once in each quarter.
The Board of Directors has organisational tasks and must approve the annual accounts. The Board of Directors
of Danmarks Nationalbank as of 1 March 2001 is shown in Box 10.
Box 10 The board of directors of Danmarks Nationalbank, 1 march 2001
Chairman: Hans E. Zeuthen, Professor
Deputy Chairman: Helle Bechgaard, Regional Manager, Ph.D. (Pharm.)
Elected by the Folketing for the period ending 31 March 2001:
Elisabeth Arnold, MP
Pia Christmas-Møller, MP
Pernille Blach Hansen, MP
Jes Lunde, MP
Christian Mejdahl, MP
Jan Petersen, MP
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, MP
Gitte Seeberg, MP
Appointed by the Royal Bank Commissioner for the period ending 31 March 2001:
Michael Dithmer, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Economic Affairs
Karsten Olsen, Former Deputy Permanent Secretary
| Elected by the Board of Directors: | For periods ending 31 March |
| Johannes Fløystrup Jensen, Managing Director | 2001 |
| Finn Thorgrimson, Former President of the Trade Union Federation | 2001 |
| Margit Vognsen, Vice-President of the Danish Trade Union of Public Employees | 2001 |
| Jette W. Knudsen, Managing Director | 2002 |
| Kjeld Larsen, Farmer | 2002 |
| Kirsten Nielsen, President of the Consumer Council | 2002 |
| Søren Bjerre-Nielsen, Group President | 2003 |
| Knud Koch Jensen, Engineer | 2003 |
| Helge Sørensen, Civil Engineer | 2003 |
| Bent le Fèvre, General Manager | 2004 |
| Jens Rostrup-Nielsen, Director, R&D Division, dr. techn. | 2004 |
| Hans E. Zeuthen, Professor | 2004 |
| Helle Bechgaard, Regional Manager, Ph.D. (Pharm.) | 2005 |
| B. Frank Nielsen, General Manager | 2005 |
| Kirsten Stallknecht, Chairman of ICN | 2005 |
The Committee of Directors
The Committee of Directors has 7 members. The two members of the Board of Directors appointed by the
Minister for Economic Affairs are permanent members. On the election of the other 5 members of the Committee
of Directors, it is customary for the Board of Directors to elect two MPs representing the government and the
opposition parties, respectively. The Committee of Directors usually meets 10 times a year. The Committee of
Directors of Danmarks Nationalbank as of 1 March 2001 is shown in Box 11.
Box 11 The committee of directors of Danmarks Nationalbank, 1 March 2001
Chairman: Hans E. Zeuthen, Professor
Deputy Chairman: Michael Dithmer, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Economic Affairs
Elected by the Board of Directors for the period ending 31 March 2001:
Søren Bjerre-Nielsen, Group President
Pernille Blach Hansen, MP
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, MP
Margit Vognsen, Vice-President of the Danish Trade Union of Public Employees
Hans E. Zeuthen, Professor
Appointed by the Royal Bank Commissioner for the period ending 31 March 2001:
Michael Dithmer, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Economic Affairs
Karsten Olsen, Former Deputy Permanent Secretary
Board of Governors
The Board of Governors has 3 members. The governors are charged with the day-to-day management of the Nationalbank and are responsible for the formulation and ongoing adjustment of monetary policy. As Governor by Royal Appointment Ms. Bodil Nyboe Andersen is Chairman of the Board of Governors. The two other members, who are appointed by the Board of Directors on the recommendation of the Committee of Directors, are Mr. Torben Nielsen and Mr. Jens Thomsen.
Auditors
The appointed external auditors of the Nationalbank are State-Authorised Public Accountant Mr. Bjarne Fabienke and State-Authorised Public Accountant Mr. Svend Ørjan Jensen.
The Nationalbank has 16 departments, cf. the organisation chart on p. 107. The tasks of the individual departments are as follow:
Organisation Chart 1 March 2001
| *) | Viggo Sørensen, Head of Division, is also Head of the Secretariat for The Guarantee Fund for Depositors and investors. |
Number, staff groups, seniority, age, etc.
At the close of 2000 the Nationalbank had 605 employees, equivalent to 552 full-time positions.
The bank has fairly equal numbers of academic staff, bank staff and IT/clerical staff, while craftsmen/technicians and service staff each account for a slightly smaller share, cf. Chart 37. During the past few years the proportion of academic staff, bank staff and IT/clerical staff has increased, reflecting an increase in the number of analytical tasks, the expansion of the financial statistics, and greater international cooperation. On the other hand, the craftsmen/technicians and service staff groups have diminished as a result of rationalisation measures, cf. Table 9.
Tabel 9 Staff groups
| Number of employees | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 |
| Academic staff/bank staff/clerical staff | 333 | 341 | 357 | 373 |
| Craftsmen/technicians/service staff | 249 | 228 | 202 | 179 |
| Total | 582 | 569 | 559 | 552 |
| Note: | Number of employees converted to full-time positions. |
In 2000, 53 new employees were taken on, and 65 left the Nationalbank, 16 of whom took their retirement. This is equivalent to a staff turnover rate of 11 per cent.
The bank has a large number of staff with low seniority, cf. Chart 38. This inter alia reflects that many new staff members with an academic background have been recruited in recent years. In addition, the bank also employs more student assistants than previously. The high number of staff with more than 20 years' seniority shows that employment by the Nationalbank is often "for life".
Chart 38 Seniority
46 per cent of the staff are women and 54 per cent men, cf. Chart 39. The proportion of women in managerial positions[1] is 14 per cent.
Chart 39 Distribution by age and gender
Staff development
It is in the joint interests, and the joint responsibility, of the management and staff that all employees
develop their personal and professional skills on an ongoing basis. This is achieved through
competence-enhancing, stimulating tasks, as well as supplementary training. Another key element is
compulsory employee appraisal interviews.
Academic staff and bank and clerical staff are subject to an internal job rotation scheme. It entails that ideally they should move on to new areas of work once or twice within the first 5 years of employment. This is planned in cooperation with the employee concerned. Employees who have served the bank longer may also rotate to a new position.
Employee development may also be shorter or longer periods of secondment to international financial institutions. At the close of 2000, 15 employees were on leave in connection with secondment.
Expenditure on courses and supplementary training has increased in recent years. In 2000, kr. 8.8 million was spent on education and training, equivalent to 4.2 per cent of the total payroll costs. The average number of training days was 4 per employee.
The breakdown of course expenditure is 42 per cent for professional courses, 24 per cent for personal development courses, 9 per cent for IT courses, and the rest for other courses and internal seminars. In 2000 the bank established an internal instructor team to hold both professional courses and courses in personal development.
Average training costs were approximately kr. 15,000 per employee in 2000. Employees with higher or intermediate educational qualifications account for the largest proportion of expenditure on courses, while course expenditure for employees with other educational backgrounds was considerably lower, cf. Chart 40. The high average expenditure in the first- mentioned group relates to managerial training and professional courses, some of which took place abroad. However, the bank's greater use of the project model, cf. p. 113, has resulted in higher expenditure on project manager training for employees with higher or intermediate educational qualifications. Since lifelong skills development within and outside the bank is part of the bank's personnel policy, the training of employees with lower educational qualifications will continue to receive priority.
Chart 40 Average course expenditure per employee
Annual appraisal interviews are held with each employee by his/her superior in order to discuss the work situation of the employee. This system comprises all employees and was reviewed in 1999, and now includes setting goals for each employee in order to achieve a balance between the expectations of each employee and the skills and expertise required for the job.
For employees covered by the job rotation scheme, planning interviews are also held, starting after approximately 2 years' employment. Participants are the employee and his/her superior, but also a representative from Personnel and Organisation. The purpose of the interview is to hear and assess the wishes, expectations and opportunities of each employee, in order to plan his/her professional and personal development in as much detail as possible.
Absence due to illness
In 2000 absence due to illness was an average of 8.1 days per employee. More attention has been paid to
absence due to illness, e.g. via interviews with employees who are absent on grounds of illness for many
days of the year.
Salary and employment conditions
All employees of the Nationalbank except those employed by the Banknote Printing Works are
subject to a collective agreement between the Nationalbank and the Nationalbank's Staff Association. The
agreement is based on the terms and conditions applying to the financial sector. The agreement is subject
to renegotiation in 2001.
In 2000 the collective agreement for employees of the Banknote Printing Works was renegotiated, and a 4-year agreement was signed with the Industry sector of the Union of Commercial and Clerical Employees in Denmark (HK).
The Nationalbank regards information technology as a fundamental prerequisite for the high-quality, efficient and secure performance of the bank's business functions. The bank's IT strategy lays down the overall rules for the use of IT within the Nationalbank. In addition, the IT strategy determines future areas of IT application. In 2001 these include enhancement and modernisation of the bank's local area network, ongoing improvement of the helpdesk and support for internal users, and strengthening of IT project work within the Nationalbank.
The high IT security requirements to which the Nationalbank is subject will continue to be expanded in accordance with the guidelines laid down by Security.
Organisation
IT functions within the Nationalbank are split into two areas. The local area network is operated by
Information Technology, which employs almost 30 people. A number of business-critical systems are
developed in cooperation with, and operated by, Bankernes Edb Central, BEC. In addition, the
Nationalbank, like the other non-euro-area EU central banks, exchanges various data with the ECB in
Frankfurt.
During 2000 the Nationalbank carried out the reorganisation of Information Technology in order to ensure optimum service to users.
Information Technology is currently upgrading and modernising the local area network by laying new IT cables, establishing new server rooms and a server complex, and upgrading the bank's PCs to the latest versions of operating and office systems.
Systems development and choice of solutions
In future the Nationalbank will seek to use standard systems and technologies, rather than customised
solutions, when this is professionally and technically justifiable.
In the areas where the Nationalbank uses and will use standard systems and technologies, these should be as close as possible to the current market standard within the area. The objective is to achieve a homogeneous complex of systems which is independent of particular individuals and suppliers.
Projects and the project organisation
The Nationalbank will conclude a number of large IT projects related to payment systems and statistics in
2001, cf. pp. 79f and 95.
In recent years the Nationalbank has focused on the organisation of IT projects. The aim is to ensure that the overall priorities correspond to the business priorities, and that projects take place within the framework laid down.
An overall body to allocate priority to the Nationalbank's IT projects and handle general IT issues has been set up. A practical and feasible IT project model and related IT project reporting has been defined. This is to significantly reduce the risk of stranded IT projects. The responsibility for completion of IT projects has been moved from Information Technology to the various business areas, in order to ensure better fulfilment of business requirements.
Euro
The referendum on Denmark's adoption of the single currency, the euro, which was called in March 2000,
had a significant impact on the work of most departments of the Nationalbank. Had Denmark decided to
adopt the euro, the Nationalbank would have been required to undertake extensive restructuring measures
within a very short period.
In 1999 the Nationalbank participated in the preparation of a changeover plan detailing Denmark's changeover to the euro in the event of Danish participation, cf. the 1999 Annual Report, p. 81.
In May 2000 the government presented a bill on Denmark's adoption of the single currency. The bill meant that in the event of a referendum result in favour of adoption of the euro Denmark would be able to join the euro area from 1 January 2002. Euro banknotes and coins would be introduced from 1 January 2004, after which krone-denominated banknotes and coins would be withdrawn from circulation. This would have given the Nationalbank just over one year to make the necessary changes prior to the introduction of the euro in Denmark, and a further two years to produce the required initial stock of euro banknotes and coins.
In view of the short time available for preparation after a referendum result in favour of adoption of the euro an internal EMU contingency plan was drawn up prior to the referendum. The plan identified the projects, especially in the IT area, that would be required. Some of these would have had to be carried out anyway partly as a result of the ongoing work on international standards, and partly as an element of the general upgrading of the IT systems, but the timing of these projects was critically dependent on the outcome of the referendum. After the referendum outcome not to adopt the euro on 28 September 2000 these projects therefore continued, but the time schedules were revised, and in some cases also the structure of the projects. However, the majority of the projects under the EMU contingency plan were shelved.
As part of these preparations the Nationalbank also presented a preliminary design of Danish euro coins, cf. p. 74.
The referendum is presented in detail on p. 82.
As of 1 March 2001 the Nationalbank is represented on the following committees, etc.:
Financing institutes
Securities market institutions
Other institutions
As a element of the international foreign-exchange and monetary-policy cooperation Danmarks Nationalbank participates in a number of committees, sub-committees and working groups, of which the most significant are:
The European Union, EU
The European Central Bank, ECB
The Nationalbank participates partly in the following ECB committees:
The International Monetary Fund, IMF
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD
In 2000 the Foundation's honorary grant was awarded to Mr. Austin Grandjean, graphic designer, who received kr. 100,000. The honorary grant was presented at the Danish Museum of Decorative Art in Copenhagen in connection with the opening of "Syn for sagn" an exhibition of Austin Grandjean's typography and other expressions of graphic design.
The purpose of the Anniversary Foundation is to extend financial support for the promotion and development of the artistic design and presentation of Danish products and to support other artistic areas, mainly decorative art, architecture and design, but also music and dance. In 2000 total grants amounted to kr. 4.8 million. Of 1,297 applications, 156 were granted. In addition 8 grants without prior application were made.
On 1 March 2001 the Board of the Foundation comprised Governor Bodil Nyboe Andersen (Chairman), Professor Hans E. Zeuthen (Deputy Chairman), Director Bodil Busk Laursen, Attorney-at-law Per Magid, Art historian Bente Scavenius and Arcitect, industrial designer Teit Weylandt. Ms. Bente Scavenius retires on 31 March 2001 and is replaced by Ceramist Karen Bennicke.
The Nationalbank has seven guest apartments at Nyhavn 18 which are made available to foreign scientists and artists. Residence in the guest apartments is free and granted from three months up to one year. In 2000 the guest apartments at Nyhavn 18 were allocated to 13 visitors.
The committee formed to advise on the allocation of the apartments consists of Professor Ole Feldbæk (Chairman), Dr. Else Marie Bukdahl and Professor Søren-Peter Fuchs Olesen.
In 2000 the Erik Hoffmeyer Travel Grant Foundation awarded grants to the pianist Nikolaj Koppel and the goldsmith Quan Duc Tien. They each received a grant of kr. 40,000 for further studies abroad.
The Erik Hoffmeyer Travel Grant Foundation was established by the Board of Directors of the Nationalbank in 1995 as a tribute to Mr. Erik Hoffmeyer for 30 years' outstanding service as Chairman of the Nationalbank's Board of Governors. The establishment and objective of the Foundation are described in the 1995 Annual Report.
The Board of the Travel Grant Foundation comprises Professor Hans E. Zeuthen (Chairman), Former Governor Erik Hoffmeyer and Former Chief Rabbi Bent Melchior.
[1] Defined as at least Assistant Head of Division.
The Nationalbank's financial risks mainly comprise market risks. The market risk is related primarily to the interest-rate and foreign-exchange sensitivity. The interest-rate sensitivity was augmented during the year. Euro-denominated assets account for the major part of the foreign-exchange sensitivity. The credit risk is very small, since the Nationalbank exclusively holds claims on counterparties with a high credit standing, and to a significant extent requires the pledging of collateral.
The Nationalbank's accounts for 2000 show a profit of kr. 5.7 billion, compared to kr. 1.5 billion in 1999. The improvement is related mainly to the increase in value adjustments by kr. 4.4 billion to kr. 1.3 billion. Of the profit for the year, kr. 3.1 billion is payable to the central government. The Nationalbank's net capital has increased by kr. 2.7 billion to kr. 44.4 billion in 2000.
The Nationalbank holds financial assets and liabilities. This entails that the Nationalbank is exposed to a number of financial risks which can affect the financial result. The principal assets are foreign deposits and securities, domestic bonds and loans to Danish banks. The principal liabilities are banknotes and coins in circulation, deposits and certificates of deposit, and the deposits of the central government. The Nationalbank is primarily exposed to market risks and to a lesser degree to other types of risk, e.g. credit risks.
Market risk
The market risk is the risk of the Nationalbank suffering a loss as a consequence of price fluctuations on the financial
markets. The nature of the Nationalbank's financial assets and liabilities entails that losses will arise primarily as a
consequence of fluctuations in interest and exchange rates.
Generally, a distinction is drawn between sensitivity and risk. Sensitivity is the extent to which the Nationalbank will incur losses on a given change in a specific risk factor, such as the interest rate. The compilation of the foreign-exchange sensitivity is based on market values of foreign-exchange outstandings. Interest-rate sensitivity indicates the capital loss to the Nationalbank as a consequence of an increase in interest rates by 1 percentage point.
On compiling the risk the probability of losses is evaluated by combining sensitivity with the probability of a change in the risk factor concerned. For example, Value-at-Risk is used to compile the total market risk. It indicates the maximum loss that with a given probability can be expected within a given time frame.
Interest-rate risk
The interest-rate risk indicates the capital loss which the Nationalbank will suffer as a consequence of a change in
interest rates. For the Nationalbank, which holds significantly more fixed-rate assets than liabilities, an increase in
interest rates will impose a loss. Experience shows that in the long term fixed-rate bonds yield higher returns than
placements at floating interest rates. Over an extended period, the bank will therefore increase its return by assuming a
certain interest-rate risk.
At the beginning of 2000 the interest-rate sensitivity of the domestic and foreign portfolios was augmented by kr. 0.5 billion to kr. 3.4 billion, cf. Table 10.
Table 10 Interest-rate sensitivity of the nationalbank
| Capital loss in kr. billion on a general 1-per-cent increase in interest rates |
End-1999 | End-2000 |
| Kroner | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| Euro | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| Pound sterling | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Dollar | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Yen | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Total | 2.8 | 3.4 |
The sensitivity to changes in interest rates of the foreign portfolio was 63 per cent of the total interest-rate sensitivity at the end of 2000.
The sensitivity to changes in Danish interest rates can be related to the Nationalbank's portfolio of securities, comprising government bonds, Danish Ship Finance bonds, and municipal- and mortgage-credit bonds. Mortgage-credit bonds are usually callable, and the compilation of the interest-rate sensitivity of these bonds takes the bonds' call option into account.
Foreign-exchange risk
Foreign-exchange risk is the risk of capital losses as a consequence of fluctuations in exchange rates. The Nationalbank
holds considerable foreign-exchange assets, first and foremost the foreign-exchange reserve. Like other central banks,
the Nationalbank therefore cannot avoid exposure to a foreign-exchange risk.
The exchange-rate risk on the foreign-exchange-denominated assets is limited by forward sale of dollars, sterling and yen against euro. This reduces the exchange-rate risk on the Nationalbank's bond and money-market placements in those currencies. For example, at the close of 2000 the Nationalbank held pound sterling assets for kr. 9 billion, but had sold sterling forward for kr. 7 billion. The total net sterling outstandings thereby amounted to kr. 2 billion in net terms.
The Nationalbank's foreign-exchange sensitivity almost entirely concerns the euro, cf. Table 11. The bank's profit is thus to only a moderate degree affected by fluctuations in the krone's exchange rate vis-à-vis the dollar, yen and pound sterling.
Table 11 Foreign-exchange exposure of the nationalbank
| Market value, kr. billion | End-1999 total |
End-2000 | ||
| Placements | Forward contracts |
Total | ||
| Euro | 164 | 70 | 57 | 127 |
| Pound sterling | 1 | 9 | - 7 | 2 |
| Dollar | 0 | 36 | - 37 | -2 |
| Yen | 2 | 9 | - 8 | 1 |
| Gold | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 172 | 130 | 5 | 134 |
| Note: | Negative amounts indicate that the Nationalbank holds liabilities. The value of SDR is distributed on the respective currencies. |
The Nationalbank's foreign-exchange outstandings had fallen by kr. 38 billion to kr. 134 billion at end-2000. This decline is related mainly to the foreign-exchange reserve.
Since 1992 the Nationalbank's foreign-exchange risk has been subject to coordinated management with the foreign-exchange risk of the central government's foreign debt. The net position, i.e. the difference between the Nationalbank's foreign-exchange-denominated assets and the central government's foreign-exchange-denominated liabilities, has in recent years been primarily in the euro. In view of the Danish fixed-exchange-rate policy the euro is found to be the currency entailing the lowest risk. As the exchange-rate risk on the central government's liabilities and the Nationalbank's assets is primarily in euro, the coordinated management was discontinued at the beginning of 2001. It is still the objective not to raise loans in one currency and then place the proceeds in another currency and thus not to expose the central government to a considerable indirect exchange-rate risk via the Nationalbank.
Calculation of market risk
In order to evaluate the market risk the Nationalbank employs various risk measures. One of these is Value-at-Risk
(VaR), which besides the probability of interest and exchange-rate losses based on historical fluctuations also includes
the covariation between them. VaR is supplemented with stress scenarios to calculate the impact on the portfolio of
extreme fluctuations in interest and exchange rates.
At the close of 2000 the Nationalbank's VaR was kr. 3.2 billion[1], cf. Table 12. There was thus only a 5 per cent probability that during the coming year the Nationalbank will have total losses exceeding kr. 3.2 billion. At the close of 1999 VaR was kr. 4.1 billion. The decrease in VaR is related to the reduced volatility of the financial markets in 2000 compared to 1999.
Table 12 The nationalbank's value-at-risk
| Value-at-Risk in kr. billion with a 1-year horizon | End-1999 | End-2000 |
| Interest-rate risk | 3.6 | 3.0 |
| Exchange-rate risk | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Gold | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Reduction due to diversification | -2.2 | -1.9 |
| Total | 4.1 | 3.2 |
| Note: | For the sake of comparison the same calculation technique for both 1999 and 2000 is used. Therefore the figures for 1999 deviate from the equivalent VaR figures in the 1999 Annual Report, cf. also footnote 1. |
The exchange-rate risk on the euro is not a traditional market risk, since the Nationalbank not only may, but is also obliged to, influence the krone/euro rate. The Nationalbank will only sustain a loss if the krone strengthens against the euro. It can therefore be of interest to evaluate VaR without the exchange-rate risk related to the euro. VaR excluding the exchange-rate risk on the euro is kr. 2.8 billion. Elimination of the exchange-rate risk related to the euro thus entails a decrease in VaR by 10 per cent.
Liquidity risk
The principal purpose of the foreign-exchange reserve is for the Nationalbank to be able to intervene in the
foreign-exchange market. In the management of the foreign-exchange reserve it is therefore very important to ensure
that the greater part of the reserve can quickly be converted to liquid funds. Therefore a large proportion of the reserve
is placed in the money market or in bonds with a high degree of security and liquidity, so that they can easily be realised
or used as collateral in various liquid markets.
The placement of the domestic securities portfolio does not take the liquidity aspect into consideration.
The Nationalbank also has access to liquidity via the central government's Commercial Paper programme amounting to 12 billion dollars. Moreover, there is an opportunity to borrow at the ECB in accordance with the ERM II agreement.
Credit risk
The credit risk is the risk of loss due to a counterparty's default on obligations.
To reduce the credit risk the Nationalbank seeks to spread its assets among counterparties with a high credit standing. Moreover, to a large extent collateral is required. The credit risk is therefore very small.
The credit risk on the foreign claims, i.e. claims on foreign governments, banks, etc., is managed on the basis of the ratings given by international rating agencies. Moreover, all significant outstandings are subject to maximum limits.
For deposits with foreign banks repo agreements with government bonds as collateral are used to a great extent. Should a repo counterparty be subject to compulsory liquidation, the Nationalbank's deposit is covered by the collateral provided.
The Nationalbank's foreign bond holdings are issued or guaranteed[2] by states with a high rating, or issued by supranational institutions. The Nationalbank thus does not hold corporate bonds or bonds issued by governments with a low credit rating.
The credit risk on domestic assets is reduced via collateral requirements. When Danish banks borrow at the Nationalbank, they provide bonds as collateral. This applies to loans related to the monetary-policy operations, the banks' intra-day credits and cash depots.
On placement of the domestic securities portfolio great weight is attached to the high credit standing of the issuers. The securities portfolio thus almost exclusively comprises government bonds, mortgage-credit bonds and Danish Ship Finance bonds.
Since approximately 90 per cent of the foreign-exchange reserve and the domestic securities portfolio are placed with supranational institutions or in assets with a rating of Aa3 or higher, the credit risk is very small, cf. Table 13.
Table 13 Total credit exposure on the foreign-exchange reserve andthe domestic securities portfolio, etc., end-2000
| Kr. billion | 1999 Total |
Bonds | Bank claims | Supra- national institu- tions |
Total | ||
| Govern- ments |
Others | Collater- alised |
Uncollater- alised |
||||
| Aaa | 73.4 | 51.4 | 10.7 | - | 2.8 | 1.6 | 66.6 |
| Aa1 | 17.2 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 3.4 | - | 11.0 |
| Aa2 | 13.5 | 0 | 0.9 | 5.0 | 6.5 | - | 12.4 |
| Aa3 | 63.4 | 11.7 | 13.4 | 14.7 | 12.9 | - | 52.8 |
| A1 | 3.8 | - | - | 3.4 | 1.8 | - | 5.1 |
| A2 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 2.2 | - | 2.2 |
| A3 | 0.2 | - | - | 2.4 | - | - | 2.4 |
| Not rating | 28.8 | - | 6.61 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 7.52 | 15.7 |
| Total | 203.3 | 69.1 | 32.7 | 27.3 | 29.8 | 9.1 | 168.0 |
| Note: | Moody's credit rating is used. |
| 1 | A few Danish mortgage-credit institutes and similar. |
| 2 | Solely covers BIS and IMF. |
The Nationalbank's Accounts with notes are shown on pp. 131-139.
The accounts for 2000 have been prepared in accordance with the same accounting policies as in the previous year.
The accounts reflect that the Nationalbank issues banknotes and coins, administers the foreign-exchange reserve and functions as banker to the banks and the mortgage-credit institutes, and to the central government.
In 2000 the profit from financial items was kr. 6,299 million and thereby kr. 4,366 million higher than in 1999. The significant increase primarily reflects positive value adjustments of kr. 1,343 million, compared to negative value adjustments of kr. 3,081 million in 1999, equivalent to an improvement by kr. 4,424 million in total. After expenses of kr. 556 million and other expenditure on ordinary operations of kr. 20 million, the profit for the year was kr. 5,724 million, or kr. 4,252 million more than in 1999.
The balance sheet has decreased from kr. 281.8 billion to kr. 237.0 billion, primarily reflecting the bank's sales of foreign exchange.
The profit and loss account
Net income from interest
Net income from interest totalled kr. 4,956 million, which is kr. 58 million less than in 1999.
Income from interest on foreign assets rose by kr. 296 million to kr. 5,815 million. The increase is a consequence of generally higher interest rates than in 1999, while the foreign-exchange reserve on average was kr. 20 billion less in 2000 than in 1999.
Net interest to banks and mortgage-credit institutes (interest on deposits and certificates of deposits less interest on lending) was kr. 983 million, compared to kr. 1,148 million in 1999. The rates of interest for certificates of deposits and lending are identical, while the rate of interest for deposits is lower. The interest rates have all been significantly higher than the equivalent rates for 1999. The decrease in the total net interest expenditure of kr. 165 million is related to the fact that the average net position of the banks and mortgage-credit institutes vis-à-vis the Nationalbank has been significantly lower in 2000 than in 1999, cf. p. 38. This is, however, partly setoff by higher interest rates.
The Nationalbanks interest expenditure on the central government's deposit rose by kr. 364 million to kr. 2,192 million. The deposit was on average lower than in the preceding year, while the discount rate, which is the rate of interest on the deposit, was higher.
Interest on loans to other borrowers fell by kr. 12 billion to kr. 175 million. The change can be attributed to a decrease by kr. 72 million because the Danish Export Finance Corporation redeemed all loans during 1999, and an increase of kr. 60 million from currency swaps with theDanish Ship Finance. The increase of kr. 60 million is related mainly to the settlement of income from interest at a higher dollar rate than in 1999.
Interest to other depositors, etc., rose by kr. 84 million to kr. 294 million, primarily as a consequence of the fact that the Nationalbank took over additional amounts under the existing commitments vis-à-vis the Danish Ship Finance, i.e. index-linked loans for a total value of kr. 3,066 million in 1999 and kr. 500 million in 2000, cf. also the 1997 Annual Report, p. 96. Interest and dividend on bonds and shares, etc. are by and large unchanged at kr. 2,563 million.
Value adjustments, etc.
Value adjustments, etc., resulted in a gain of kr. 1,343 million.
Value adjustment of the Nationalbank's gold stock gave a gain of kr. 116 million, which is related to a an increase in the dollar by 8.4 per cent, while the price of gold in dollars fell by 5.4 per cent.
The value adjustment of foreign-exchange positions comprises the value adjustment of the foreign-exchange reserve, as well as value adjustment of unsettled foreign-exchange contracts, currency and interest-rate swaps, domestic foreign-exchange balances, and the liability: counterpart of Special Drawing Rights (SDR) allocated by the IMF. The value adjustment gave a gain of kr. 1,126 million, which can be attributed to an exchange-rate gain of kr. 280 million and a market-value gain of kr. 846 million. The exchange-rate gain is related primarily to an exchange-rate gain in euro and SDR and an exchange-rate loss in dollar.
The value adjustment of (domestic) bonds and shares gave a total gain of kr. 101 million, of which the gain on bonds was kr. 68 million, while the gain on sale of shares in Dansk Udviklingsfinansering A/S realised kr. 39 million. This was equivalent to the sales proceeds, since the Nationalbank's share portfolio was included in the accounts at kr. 1 per shareholding. Moreover, share acquisitions in VP A/S-The Danish Securities Centre and SWIFT were written down by a total of kr. 6 million, to kr. 1 per shareholding.
The market-value gain on domestic and foreign bonds can be related to the general decrease in long-term interest rates, which is set off partly by the fact that a large proportion of the bond portfolio at the beginning of the year had a market value above par, and therefore automatically released a capital loss in step with redemption, or because the redemption date was forthcoming.
Expenses
Total expenses increased by kr. 11 million to kr. 556 million, or 2.0 per cent.
Staff expenses fell by kr. 5 million to kr. 293 million. Of this decrease kr. 9 million, equivalent to 3.2 per cent, constitutes an increase in wages, salaries and fees, and other staff expenses, and kr. 14 million a decrease in the provision carried as expenditure for support and severance schemes.
Other expenses rose by kr. 16 million to kr. 263 million, equivalent to an increase of 6.5 per cent.
Other expenditure on ordinary operations
A commemorative coin was issued on the occasion of Queen Margrethe's 60th birthday on 16 April 2000. Since claims
for encashment of the commemorative coin are considered unlikely, on the issue of the commemorative coin an
estimated profit of kr. 19 million is distributed at half to the Crown and at half to the Ministry of Economic Affairs for
charitable purposes, cf. p. 70.
Result for the year
The result for the year is a profit of kr. 5,724 million, against a profit of kr. 1,472 million in 1999. In accordance with
the practice for allocation of profits the gain on value adjustments of kr. 1,343 million is allocated to the Value
Adjustment Reserve, which hereafter amounts to kr. 1,363 million. An amount of kr. 1,314 million is allocated to the
General Reserves, corresponding to 30 per cent of the profit excluding value adjustments. The General Reserves
hereafter total kr. 42,753 million. The remainder of kr. 3,066 million is payable to the central government.
The balance sheet
Stock of gold
The stock of gold amounted to kr. 4.7 billion at the end of the year, compared to kr. 4.6 billion in 1999. The increase is
related to the increase in the price of gold in kroner during 2000.
Foreign assets
Assets amounted to kr. 110.8 billion at the end of the year, compared to kr. 154.7 billion in 1999. This is equivalent to
a decrease of 28 per cent. The assets are placed in euro, dollars, pound sterling and yen. The positions are held mainly
in highly-rated government bonds, government-guaranteed bonds, deposits with central banks and commercial banks,
or as lending against collateral in government bonds.
Foreign assets are the most significant item of the foreign-exchange reserve, together with the stock of gold, claims on the IMF and foreign liabilities.
Claims on the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
The balance-sheet item comprises Danmark's IMF quota less the IMF's holdings of Danish kroner at the Nationalbank,
with addition of the banks' holdings of Special Drawing Rights (SDR). During the year this asset decreased by kr. 3.3
billion to kr. 5.1 billion, which is related to the fact that at the request of the IMF a number of member countries have
acquired SDR assets from the Nationalbank within the agreed limit, cf. the 1998 Annual Report, p. 93. Moreover,
there was also an increase as a consequence of value adjustments.
Loans, etc.
Loans mainly comprise accounts with banks and mortgage-credit institutes and must be evaluated together with the item
deposits, etc., and certificates of deposit. The net assets of the banks and mortgage-credit institutes with the
Nationalbank decreased during the year from kr. 68.3 billion to kr. 32.0 billion. This includes loans related to cash
depots, which decreased from kr. 5.0 billion to kr. 2.7 billion.
Bonds and shares, etc.
The holdings comprise domestic securities and constitute kr. 39.8 billion, which is an increase of kr. 2.1 billion from
1999. The holdings are primarily municipal-credit and mortgage-credit bonds (kr. 20.3 billion), government bonds (kr.
14.8 billion) and Danish Ship Finance bonds (kr. 4.7 billion). Shares and equivalent investments with an estimated
market value of kr. 908 billion are included at kr. 1 per shareholding.
Banknotes and coins in circulation
Banknotes in circulation decreased by kr. 1.8 billion to kr. 40.6 billion, while coins in circulation increased by kr. 0.1
billion to kr. 4.1 billion. Banknotes in circulation include Faroese notes at kr. 276 billion. A large proportion of the
decrease in banknotes in circulation is related to the extraordinary large holdings by the banks in 1999 in connection
with the safeguarding of cash supplies at the millennium rollover, cf. p. 69.
Foreign liabilities
The liabilities increased by kr. 0.7 billion to kr. 3.1 billion and comprise krone deposits with the Nationalbank from
supranational institutions and other central banks.
Counterpart of Special Drawing Rights (SDR) allocated by the IMF
The allocation was unchanged during the year and the increase in the item by kr. 0.1 billion to kr. 1.9 billion solely
reflects the value adjustment for the year.
Deposits, etc.
Besides deposits from banks and mortgage-credit institutes of kr. 45.1 billion this item includes other deposits of kr. 7.3
billion, of which the account of the Danish Ship Finance is the largest at kr. 3.8 billion.
Certificates of deposit
Certificates of deposit, which are the Nationalbank's short-term debt securities sold to banks and mortgage-credit
institutes, fell by kr. 48.0 billion to kr. 51.9 billion.
Central government
The central-government deposit decreased from kr. 39.7 billion to kr. 37.7 billion. The central government's share of
the profit of the Nationalbank is included in this amount.
Net capital
The net capital amounts to kr. 44,416 million, which is the net capital at the beginning of the year of kr. 41,758 million
with addition of positive value adjustments of kr. 1,343 million and addition of a share of kr. 1,314 million of the result
before value adjustments.
Copenhagen, end-February 2001
Bodil Nyboe Andersen Torben Nielsen Jens Thomsen
At its meeting of the Board of Directors held on 20 March 2001 the Board of Governors reported on the activities of the Nationalbank in 2000. The report was noted.
The Nationalbank's accounts for 2000 were submitted by the Board of Governors for adoption on the recommendation of the Committee of Directors. The Board of Directors and the Royal Bank Commissioner accepted the recommendation.
[1] VaR is calculated on the basis of estimated volatilities and correlations between relevant risk factors for the last 160 days. VaR is determined by combining these estimates with the portfolio composition at end-2000. The implementation of new software in 2000 to calculate VaR has made it possible to include the gold stock in the VaR calculations.
[2] The government-guaranteed securities include securities with an implicit government guarantee.
| Note | 2000 1,000 kr. |
1999 1,000 kr. |
||
| Income from interest, etc.: | ||||
| Interest on foreign assets | 5,815,210 | 5,518,638 | ||
| 1 | Interest on loans, etc. | 2,196,500 | 1,008,982 | |
| Interest and dividend on bonds and shares, etc. | 2,563,058 | 2,543,921 | ||
| Commission and other income | 6,059 |
15,624 |
||
| 10,580,827 | 9,087,165 | |||
| Expenditure on interest, etc.: | ||||
| Interest on foreign liabilities | 133,450 | 65,099 | ||
| 2 | Interest on deposits, etc. and certificates of deposit | 5,491,211 |
4,007,796 |
|
| 5,624,661 |
4,072,895 |
|||
| Net income from interest | 4,956,166 | 5,014,270 | ||
| Value adjustments, etc.: | ||||
| Value adjustment of gold | 115,818 | 635,925 | ||
| Value adjustment of foreign assets | 1,126,223 | -2,683,684 | ||
| 3 | alue adjustment of bonds and shares, etc. | 100,891 |
-1,033,727 |
|
| 1,342,932 |
-3,081,486 |
|||
| Profit from financial items | 6,299,098 | 1,932,784 | ||
| Profit from financial items | 6,299,098 | 1,932,784 | ||
| Other income from ordinary operations | - | 84,284 | ||
| Expenses: | ||||
| 4 | Staff expenses | 292,818 | 297,999 | |
| 5 | Other expenses | 263,241 |
246,926 |
|
| 556,059 | 544,925 | |||
| 6 | Other expenditure on ordinary operations | 19,532 |
- |
|
| Profit for the year | 5,723,507 | 1,472,143 | ||
| which is allocated as follows: | ||||
| OTransfer to the Value Adjustment Reserve | 1,342,932 | -3,081,486 | ||
| Allocation to General Reserves | 1,314,172 |
1,366,089 |
||
| Payable to the central government | 3,066,403 |
3,187,540 |
||
| Pursuant to the Danmarks Nationalbank Act the profit for the year after allocations is payable to the central government. | ||||
Comments on the Profit and Loss Account will be found in the Previous chapter
| Note | 2000 1,000 kr. |
1999 1,000 kr. |
||
| Assets | ||||
| Stock of gold | 4,682,768 | 4,566,951 | ||
| Foreign assets | 110,851,284 | 154,715,301 | ||
| 7 | Claims on the International Monetary Fund (IMF) | 5,126,649 | 8,441,266 | |
| 8 | Loans , etc. | 67,634,540 | 72,945,688 | |
| 9 | Bonds and shares, etc. | 39,847,026 | 37,696,381 | |
| 10 | Other assets | 8,843,737 | 3,417,368 | |
| Accruals | 20,888 |
19,401 |
||
| Total assets | 237,006,892 |
281,802,356 |
||
| Liabilities | ||||
| Banknotes | 40,649,923 | 42,429,943 | ||
| Coins | 4,148,455 | 3,951,719 | ||
| Foreign liabilities | 3,143,427 | 2,424,958 | ||
| Counterpart of Special Drawing Rights allocated by the International Monetary Fund (SDR) | 1,868,986 | 1,814,683 | ||
| 11 | Deposits, etc. | 52,460,337 | 46,403,909 | |
| Certificates of deposit | 51,874,000 | 99,896,000 | ||
| Central government | 37,717,606 | 39,677,540 | ||
| Other liabilities | 728,582 |
3,445,132 |
||
| Total creditors | 192,591,316 | 240,043,884 | ||
| General Capital Fund | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||
| Statutory Reserve | 250,000 | 250,000 | ||
| Value Adjustment Reserve | 1,362,896 | 19,964 | ||
| General Reserves | 42,752,680 |
41,438,508 |
||
| Total net capital | 44,415,576 |
41,758,472 |
||
| Total liabilities | 237,006,892 |
281,802,356 |
||
| 12 | Off-balance-sheet items: | |||
| Guarantees | 197,793 | 475,172 | ||
| Other liabilities | 65,895,427 |
71,758,304 |
||
| 66,093,220 |
72,233,476 |
|||
| 2000 1,000 kr. |
1999 1,000 kr. |
||
| Accounting policies The accounts for 2000 have been prepared in accordance with the same accounting policies as for the previous year. |
|||
| Gold is entered at market value at year-end. | |||
| Assets and liabilities in foreign exchange are entered at the official exchange rates and the market prices prevailing at year-end. | |||
| Bonds and shares. The bond portfolio is entered at the official market prices at year-end. Shares are entered at kr. 1 per shareholding. | |||
| Properties, machinery and equipment are entered as expenditure in the year of acquisition. At the most recent official assessment the bank's properties were valued at kr. 738.2 million. | |||
| Note | |||
| 1 | Interest on loans, etc. | ||
| Interest on to domestic banks and mortgage-credit institutes | 2,021,971 | 821,504 | |
| Interest on loans to other borrowers | 174,529 |
187,478 |
|
| 2,196,500 |
1,008,982 |
||
| 2 | Interest on deposits, etc. and certificates of deposit | ||
| Interest on deposits from domestic banks and mortgage-credit institutes | 271,340 | 192,391 | |
| Interest on the central government's deposits | 2,192,201 | 1,828,169 | |
| Interest to other depositors, etc. | 294,327 | 209,620 | |
| Interest on certificates of deposit | 2,733,343 |
1,777,616 |
|
| 5,491,211 |
4,007,796 |
||
| 3 | Value adjustment of bonds and shares, etc. | ||
| This includes sales proceeds of kr. 39.1 million on the sale of the bank's shareholding in Finance for Danish Industry. | |||
| 4 | Staff expenses | ||
| Salaries and remuneration | 221,983 | 215,966 | |
| Other staff expenses | 59,835 | 57,033 | |
| Allocations to support and severance schemes | 11,000 |
25,000 |
|
| 292,818 |
297,999 |
||
| 5 | Other expenses | ||
| Purchases of materials, note production | 17,223 | 21,591 | |
| Purchases of materials, coin production | 14,235 | 14,201 | |
| Purchases of machinery and equipment | 35,801 | 47,004 | |
| Real property, current expenses | 85,667 | 57,280 | |
| Data processing and expenses incidental to VP A/S The Danish Securities Centre | 57,728 | 46,529 | |
| Other expenses | 56,347 | 63,553 | |
| Income from sale of coin sets and medals, etc. | -3,760 |
-3,232 |
|
| 263,241 |
246,926 |
||
| 6 | Other expenditure on ordinary operations The amount primarily comprises a disbursement of kr. 19 million in connection with the issue of a commemorative coin. Since claims for encashment of the commemorative coin are considered unlikely the profit is distributed at half to the Crown and half to the Ministry of Economic Affairs for charitable purposes. |
||
| 7 | Claims on the International Monetary Fund (IMF) | ||
| Denmark's IMF quota | 17,165,946 | 16,667,192 | |
| The IMF's holdings of Danish kroner | 12,567,132 |
10,761,718 |
|
| Reserve position with the IMF | 4,598,814 | 5,905,474 | |
| Holdings of Special Drawing Rights | 527,835 |
2,535,792 |
|
| 5,126,649 |
8,441,266 |
||
| Banks and mortgage-credit institutes | 65,053,125 | 70,290,159 | |
| Other borrowers | 2,581,415 |
2,655,529 |
|
| 67,634,540 |
72,945,688 |
||
| 9 | Bonds and shares, etc. As of 31 December 2000 the estimated market value of the bank's holdings of shares and similar investments, including in the accounts at kr. 1 per shareholding, was kr. 908 million. The portfolio comprises shares, etc. in Bank for International Settlements (BIS), SAS Danmark, The Bank of Greenland, Bella Center, The Danish Steel Works, VP A/S The Danish Securities Centre, Herning-Hallen, ECB-capital contribution and SWIFT. |
||
| 10 | Other assets This amount includes outstanding interest of kr. 2,488 million. (1999: kr. 2,590 million) |
||
| 11 | Deposits, etc. | ||
| Banks and mortgage-credit institutes | 45,137,725 | 38,712,350 | |
| Other depositors | 7,322,612 |
7,691,559 |
|
| 52,460,337 |
46,403,909 |
||
| 12 | Off-balance-sheet items Guarantees of kr. 198 million mainly comprise guarantees concerning VP A/S - The Danish Securities Centre of kr. 134 million and Danish Ship Finance of kr. 63 million. The bank is liable for obligations in the Danmarks Nationalbanks Pension Fund. The bank provides a price guarantee to the central banks of other EU member states in the event of the realisation of Danish securities pledged as collateral in connection with intra-day credit in the TARGET payment system. Other liabilities comprise unsettled forward purchases, the market value of unsettled currency swaps and the non-utilised portion of credit facilities made available to the IMF and the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility Trust (PRGF). The Kingdom of Denmark has provided a guarantee concerning the PRGF credit facility. In addition, the bank has entered into intervention agreements with the ECB and with Nordic central banks. |
||
Copenhagen, 12 February 2001
Bodil Nyboe Andersen Torben Nielsen Jens Thomsen /Henrik Larsen, Chief Accountant
Report of the internal audit
We have audited the annual accounts of Danmarks Nationalbank for the year 1999 presented by the Management.
Basis of opinion
We have conducted the audit on the basis of the Danmarks Nationalbank Act and Danmarks Nationalbank's by-laws
and in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in Denmark.
Based on an evaluation of materiality and risk we have assessed whether the Bank's procedures and internal control systems provide adequate security, just as we have tested the basis and documentation for the amounts and other information presented in the annual accounts. This included an assessment of the applied accounting policies and the accounting estimates made, as well as an assessment of the adequacy of the information presented in the annual accounts.
The audit has not resulted in any qualifications.
Opinion
In our opinion the annual accounts have been prepared in accordance with the Danmarks Nationalbank Act and
Danmarks Nationalbank's by-laws and reflect the income and expenses for the year and the assets and liabilities of
Danmarks Nationalbank as at 31 December 1999.
Copenhagen, 12 February 2001
Peter Jochimsen, Chief Auditor
Report of the external auditors
As auditors appointed by the Royal Bank Commissioner we have audited the annual accounts for the year ended 31
December 1999 of Danmarks Nationalbank.
Basis of opinion
We planned and conducted our audit in continuation of the audit performed by the Bank's internal audit and in
accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in Denmark to obtain reasonable assurance that the annual
accounts are free of material misstatements. Based on an evaluation of materiality and risk, we have tested the basis and
documentation for the amounts and disclosures in the annual accounts. Our audit included an assessment of the
accounting policies applied and estimates made. In addition we have evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation
of information in the annual accounts.
Our audit has not resulted in any qualifications.
Opinion
In our opinion the annual accounts have been prepared in accordance with the Danmarks Nationalbank Act and
Danmarks Nationalbank's by-laws and reflect the income and expenses for the year and the assets and liabilities as at
31 December 1999.
Copenhagen, 12 February 2001
Svend Ørjan Jensen, State-Authorised Public Accountant Bjarne Fabienke, State-Authorised Public Accountant
These accounts, audited in the manner prescribed by the by-laws of Danmarks Nationalbank, are hereby adopted by the Board of Directors.
Copenhagen, 20 March 2001
Hans E. Zeuthen Helle Bechgaard Michael Dithmer
Elisabeth Arnold Søren Bjerre-Nielsen Pia Christmas-Møller Bent le Fèvre Pernille Blach Hansen
J. Fløystrup Jensen Knud Koch Jensen Jette W. Knudsen Kjeld Larsen Jes Lunde Christian Mejdahl
B. Frank Nielsen Kirsten Nielsen Karsten Olsen Jan Petersen Anders Fogh Rasmussen
Jens Rostrup-Nielsen Gitte Seeberg Kirsten Stallknecht Helge Sørensen Finn Thorgrimson Margit Vognsen
28 September 2000
"Danmarks Nationalbank takes note of the result of the referendum", governor Bodil Nyboe Andersen states in a
comment on the result of the Danish referendum on the adoption of the single currency, the euro.
"After the "no", Danmarks Nationalbank will keep the exchange rate of the Danish krone stable vis-à-vis the euro, as has been the case since 1 January 1999 and until then vis-à-vis the D-mark. The fixed-exchange rate policy has served Denmark well for the last two decades, and it is extremely important that this policy be maintained unchanged", Bodil Nyboe Andersen states.
28 September 2000
Given the result of the referendum Denmark shall not abrogate its exemption from Danish participation in the euro.
Denmarks EU-membership remains unchanged.
Denmark will continue the present fixed exchange rate policy vis-a- vis the euro within the framework of the narrow band of EU's exchange rate mechansim, ERM2.
The Danish economy is fundamentally sound. Danmarks Nationalbank and the Government will follow developments in financial markets closely and stand ready if need be to take measures in order to maintain and continue the fixed exchange rate policy.
The Fiscal Bill for 2001 is based on Danish participation in the euro. The negotiations on the budget will start next week, and in this context the Government is ready to tighten fiscal policy if this should prove necessary to maintain Denmark's fixed exchange rate policy.
3 February 2000 on interest rate increase
The discount rate is raised by 0.25 per cent to 3.25 per cent. Likewise the rate of interest on the banks' current
accounts with the Nationalbank is raised by 0.25 per cent to 3.25 per cent. The Nationalbank's lending rate and the
rate of interest on certificates of deposit are raised by 0.30 per cent to 3.60 per cent. The increase will have effect as
from 4 February 2000.
The interest rate increase should be viewed against the background of the European Central Bank's raising of interest rates.
16 March 2000 on interest rate increase
The discount rate is raised by 0.25 per cent to 3.50 per cent. Likewise the rate of interest on the banks' current
accounts with the Nationalbank is raised by 0.25 per cent to 3.50 per cent. The Nationalbank's lending rate and the
rate of interest on certificates of deposit are raised by 0.25 per cent to 3.85 per cent. The increase will have effect as
from 17 March 2000.
The interest rate increase should be viewed against the background of the European Central Bank's raising of interest rates.
27 April 2000 on interest rate increase
The discount rate is raised by 0.25 per cent to 3.75 per cent. Likewise the rate of interest on the banks' current
accounts with the Nationalbank is raised by 0.25 per cent to 3.75 per cent. The Nationalbank's lending rate and the
rate of interest on certificates of deposit are raised by 0.25 per cent to 4.10 per cent. The increase will have effect as
from 28 April 2000.
The interest rate increase should be viewed against the background of the European Central Bank's raising of interest rates.
8 June 2000 on interest rate increase
The discount rate is raised by 0.5 per cent to 4.25 per cent. Likewise the rate of interest on the banks' current accounts
with the Nationalbank is raised by 0.5 per cent to 4.25 per cent. The Nationalbank's lending rate and the rate of interest
on certificates of deposit are raised by 0.60 per cent to 4.70 per cent. The increase will have effect as from 9 June
2000.
The interest rate increase should be viewed mainly against the background of the European Central Bank's raising of interest rates of 0.50 per cent. However, the Nationalbank raises the lending rate and the interest rate on certificates of deposit by a little more than the ECBs rate increases. The reason is that during recent months the Nationalbank has sold foreign exchange, and since 30 May for around DKK 10 billion.
22 August 2000 on interest rate increase
Danmarks Nationalbank's lending rate and the rate of interest on certificates of deposit are raised by 0.20 per cent to
4.90 per cent. The increase will have effect as from 23 August 2000.
On 8 June the Nationalbank raised the lending rate and the rate of interest on certificates of deposit in connection with the increase of the European Central Bank's main refinancing rate to 4.25 per cent. Simultaneously the ECB announced that the main refinancing operations would be carried out as variable rate tenders as from 28 June. In these tenders most recently at today's tender the marginal interest rate has increased to 4,47 per cent. The Nationalbank's interest rate increase is a consequence of this development.
29 August 2000 on interest rate increase
Danmarks Nationalbank's lending rate and the rate of interest on certificates of deposit are raised by 0.20 per cent to
5.10 per cent. The increase will have effect as from 30 August 2000.
The Nationalbank's interest rate increase is a consequence of the rate increase of the main refinancing operations of the European Central Bank.
31 August 2000 on interest rate increase
The discount rate is raised by 0.25 per cent to 4.50 per cent. Likewise the rate of interest on the banks' current
accounts with the Nationalbank is raised by 0.25 per cent to 4.50 per cent. The increase will have effect as from 1
September 2000.
The interest rate increase is a consequence of the increase in the European Central Bank's minimum bid rate on the main refinancing operations by 0.25 per cent to 4.50 per cent.
The Nationalbank's lending rate and the rate of interest on certificates of deposit remain unchanged at 5.10 per cent.
5 September on interest rate reduction
Danmarks Nationalbank's lending rate and the rate of interest on certificates of deposit are lowered by 0.10 per cent to
5.00 per cent. The decrease will have effect as from 6 September 2000.
The Nationalbank's interest rate decrease is a consequence of the rate decrease on the main refinancing operations of the European Central Bank.
The discount rate and the rate of interest on the banks' current accounts with the Nationalbank remain unchanged at 4.50 per cent.
26 September on interest rate increase
Danmarks Nationalbank's lending rate and the rate of interest on certificates of deposit are raised by 0.10 per cent to
5.10 per cent. The increase will have effect as from 27 September 2000.
The interest rate increase is a consequence of today's tender operations of the European Central Bank, resulting in an increase in the marginal rate.
The discount rate and the rate of interest on the banks' current accounts with the Nationalbank remain unchanged at 4.50 per cent.
29 September 2000 on Interest rate increase
The Danish fixed-exchange-rate policy will be maintained after yesterday's referendum.
There has recently been some pressure against the Danish krone. This has resulted in short-term interest rates that are significantly higher than the Nationalbank's official interest rates, and intervention in support of the krone by the Nationalbank.
In order to avoid uncertainty concerning the krone the Nationalbank's lending rate and the rate of interest on certificates of deposit are raised by 0.50 per cent to 5.60 per cent with effect from 29 September 2000.
The discount rate and the rate of interest on the banks' current accounts with the Nationalbank remain unchanged at 4.50 per cent.
5 October 2000 on interest rate increase
The discount rate is raised by 0.25 per cent to 4.75 per cent. Likewise the rate of interest on the banks' current
accounts with the Nationalbank is raised by 0.25 per cent to 4.75 per cent. The increase will have effect as from 6
October 2000.
The interest rate increase is a consequence of the increase by 0.25 per cent in the European Central Bank's minimum bid rate on the main refinancing operations.
The Nationalbank's lending rate and the rate of interest on certificates of deposit remain unchanged at 5.60 per cent.
6 March 2000
There is a longstanding tradition in Denmark to issue commemorative coins to mark special events in the Royal Family.
The Queen's 60th birthday on 16 April 2000 will therefore be marked with the issue of two commemorative coins.
A 20-krone coin and a 200-krone coin will be issued. The 20-krone coin is of the same size and metal as the ordinary 20-krone coin in circulation. It is minted in an edition of one million coins. The 200-krone coin has a diameter of 38 mm and is minted of fine silver in an edition of maximum 60,000 coins.
The coins are designed by the sculptor Professor Mogens Møller and minted by the Royal Mint.
The motif on the face of the coin is a right-side profile of the Queen. Behind the queen a stylised marguerite can be discerned. The portrait is placed in a small hollow in the coin so that the relief appears especially high. On the reverse appear a crown and a bunch of marguerites together with the coin denomination and the years 1940 and 2000. This version of the crown was used on the ½-, 1- and 2-krone coins dating from the period 1924-41.
As from 3 April the coins may be purchased at their nominal value from banks, coin dealers, post offices and at the Nationalbank. The 200-krone coin may also be purchased subject to prepayment from the Royal Mint, Solmarksvej 5, 2605 Brøndby. The price is kr. 200 per coin, plus postage charges of kr. 50. The amount is payable to post giro account no. 5 51 05 70 or by bank transfer to account with the Nationalbank (reg. no. 1005 account 63539), including details of the recipient's name and address.
28 April 2000
Today Danmarks Nationalbank publishes a supplementary new compilation of the foreign-exchange reserve. Initially the
new statistics cover the months from December 1999 to March 2000. In future, on the last banking day of each month
equivalent statistics for the preceding month will be published.
The new statistics are a supplement to the compilation of the Nationalbank's foreign-exchange reserve which is published two banking days after the close of the month in conjunction with the publication of the bank's monthly balance sheet.
The supplementary new statistics are significantly more detailed than those published two days after the close of the month. The statistics also differ in that the assets are compiled at market value in the new statistics, while in the statistics published on the 2nd banking day of the month value adjustments are made only once a year. The new statistics also include information on short-term liabilities concerning the central government's foreign borrowing.
The statistics are prepared in accordance with the new guidelines of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for central banks' publication of foreign-exchange reserves. These guidelines are set out in the IMF's data dissemination standard (SDDS) which is designed to improve the basis for evaluation of a country's economic and financial position. Together with 46 other countries Denmark is committed to complying with these guidelines.
The new statistics for the foreign-exchange reserve will be published at approximately 4.00 p.m. on the last banking day of the month on Danmarks Nationalbank's Web site at www.nationalbanken.dk under the category Statistics, SDDS. This information will also be presented in the Nationalbank's Monetary Financial Statistics, which are published at the same time.
The IMF's data dissemination standard and the international cooperation on statistics are described in the Nationalbank's 1999 Annual Report, p. 94ff.
Directive 2000/46/EC on the taking up, pursuit and prudential
supervision of the business of electronic money institutions
In 1998 the European Commission submitted a directive proposal in this area. The directive was finally adopted on 18
September 2000 and must be implemented by 27 April 2002. The directive is directed primarily at issuers of electronic
money and aims at coordination and harmonisation of the member states' legislation on the pursuit and supervision of the
business of electronic money institutions. This entails that such institutions will be subject to financial supervision and to
the rules on the "EU passport", i.e. the free right of establishment, free exchange of services and mutual recognition of
supervision. Issuers of electronic money will be subject to simple and more lenient capital requirements, but also to
more restrictive placement rules than credit institutions. The background is the different balance-sheet structure of such
institutions whereby the liabilities consist of unredeemed electronic money. Very liquid placement of assets is an
equivalent requirement. According to the proposal a member state may stipulate more lenient requirements for small
national systems, but such systems will not be subject to the rules on the "EU passport". See also the proposal for
implementation in Danish legislation on p. 155.
Directive 2000/31/EC on electronic commerce
On 8 June 2000 a directive regulating certain legal aspects of electronic commerce was finally adopted. The directive
must be implemented by 17 January 2002. Its objective is to contribute to ensuring a well-functioning internal market.
The directive is based on the "principle of country of origin", whereby enterprises acting as providers of goods and
services are subject to home country regulation supervision. This principle will facilitate business enterprises'
opportunities for cross-border sales and marketing activities. However, the principle may be subject to exemption with
reference to consumer protection.
Proposal for a directive on reconstruction and liquidation of credit
institutions (Winding up)
The directive proposal was first submitted in 1985. Progress on the directive proposal has been difficult in view of the
aspects related to bankruptcy law. The negotiations were suspended in 1993. In 1999, the proposal was subject to
reconsideration. The EU member states then reached agreement on the proposal at the meeting of the ECOFIN
Council on 8 May 2000. The directive is applicable to credit institutions and their branches established in another
member state than that of the credit institution's head office. The underlying principle of the directive is that credit
institutions are reconstructed/liquidated subject to the principle of unity and universality in the reconstruction/liquidation.
This grants exclusive competence to the authorities of the home country. Decisions made by authorities in the home
country must be recognised by the other member states. These decisions have immediate legal enforceability. The
objective is to ensure uniform treatment of any rights vested in the creditors of the credit institution under reconstruction
or liquidation, irrespective of whether the creditors are residents of the home country of the credit institution, or the host
country. Furthermore, the directive will also ensure that these measures can be enforced vis-à-vis a credit institution's
branches in other member states under the regulations of the home country, unless otherwise stipulated in the directive.
Proposal for a directive on amendment of directive 91/308/EC on
money laundering
At the meeting of the ECOFIN Council on 30 November 2000 agreement was reached on a joint position concerning
the proposal for a directive to amend the money-laundering directive. The directive contains provisions to expand its
scope as well as to update the directive, against the background of experience of its application hitherto. The definition
of crimes related to money laundering is extended and the definition of natural or legal persons is expanded to include
accountants, attorneys, real-estate agents, etc.
Proposal for amendment of directive 85/611/EEC in the field of
undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities
(UCITS)
In July 1998 the European Commission submitted two separate directive proposals to amend the current directive from
1985. The first proposal focuses on the product offered, while the second proposal focuses on the provider. The
objective of the product proposal is to extend the scope of the directive to include institutions investing in money-market
instruments, bank deposits, shares in other non-harmonised investment institutions and standardised futures and options
traded in regulated markets, as well as OTC instruments. The proposal provides for the composition of the asset
portfolio to resemble a stock or bond index. Investment associations covered by this proposal will thus also gain the
right to provide their products in all EU/EEA member states (the European passport). The objective of the second
proposal (the administration company proposal) is to introduce regulation of administration companies granting such
companies access to operate in other member states by establishment or by free exchange of services (the European
passport). The current restrictions on the activities of the administration companies are to be relaxed to allow the
administration companies to undertake individual portfolio management and other accessory activities. Finally, simplified
prospectuses are introduced. Political agreement on the first amendment proposal (the product directive) was reached
at the meeting of the ECOFIN Council in October 2000. At the meeting it was agreed to adopt the two proposals
simultaneously. The Swedish presidency will submit the second amendment proposal to the ECOFIN Council in March
2001 with a view to adoption of a joint position on both proposals at a later stage in the first half of 2001.
Proposal for a directive on distance marketing of financial services
In 1997 the ECOFIN Council and the European Parliament adopted a directive on the protection of consumers in
respect of distance selling. Distance selling concerning financial services were exempt from this directive. A directive has
been under way for several years. The objective of this directive is to enhance transparency vis-à-vis the consumer, and
the right to reverse any distant contract concerning financial services. A central issue is disagreement in the European
Commission and the member states on whether the directive should provide for minimum regulation or harmonisation.
The European Commission maintains its view that it should be a harmonisation directive. This position should be viewed
against the background of the ample opportunities to market financial services across national borders. The European
Commission finds that great variation in the regulation of marketing of financial services in the various member states will
create problems for business enterprises and act as a barrier to the internal market. The work continues in 2001.
The Act on Danish Commercial Banks and Savings Banks
In May 2000 the Folketing (Parliament) adopted a number of amendments to the Act on Danish Commercial Banks
and Savings Banks with effect from 1 June 2000. The objective was to accommodate some of the recommendations of
the Committee on the Financial Sector after the Year 2000. The amendments are as follows:
The Securities Trading Act
This Act was amended twice in 2000. In the spring the Folketing (Parliament) adopted amendments with three
central elements: adjustment of regulations on financial groups, accountability vis-à-vis authorised marketplaces
and the implementation of directive 98/26/EC of 19 May 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities
settlement systems. The objective of the directive is to establish a common legal framework so as to reduce the
systemic risk of payment and settlement systems by ensuring the finality of a payment request which can be
carried out automatically by the system even in the event of insolvency, and by ensuring that collateral provided
to the system is not affected by liquidation or suspension of payments. In addition, it is possible to choose the
national law to be applied to the system. A registration and notification procedure is introduced whereby systems
approved/registered in one member state are notified to the Commission. A consequential innovation for
Denmark is the introduction of a registration scheme for payment systems. As a consequence, the regulations on
netting and provision of collateral apply solely to such systems, as well as payment system activities by Danmarks
Nationalbank and by securities clearing houses approved by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority.
In December the Folketing (Parliament) adopted amendments of which the principal elements are listed below:
The Mortgage Credit Act
This Act was adopted in the spring of 2000 and introduced regulations on holding companies, cf. above
concerning the Act on Danish Commercial Banks and Savings Banks. It also abolished the limitations of
voting rights in the articles of association of mortgage-credit limited-liability companies for other
shareholders than the fund or the institute. Modelled on the Act on Danish Commercial Banks and Savings
Banks, this Act furthermore introduces restructuring provisions, so that mortgage-credit institutes which
are structured as holding funds can be restructured as limited liability companies in accordance with the
"encapsulation model". This Act also updates the balance principle by introducing more flexible provisions
on issue of mortgage-credit bonds.
The Act on a Guarantee Fund for Depositors and Investors
In May 2000 the Folketing (Parliament) adopted a bill to amend the Act on a Guarantee Fund for
Depositors and Investors. The amendments are intended to solve the outstanding problems in the Act in
relation to the provisions of EU legislation on government subsidies. The government subsidy issue, and
thereby the requirements concerning notification to and approval by the European Commission of the
Guarantee Fund's contribution to the winding up of a credit institution, prevented the guarantee scheme
from functioning appropriately in connection with liquidation. These amendments establish a number of
special procedures to be observed by the Guarantee Fund in order to prevent a situation which might lead
to considerations concerning government subsidies. According to the explanatory notes to the Act the
government subsidy issue, according to the European Commission, can be avoided if:
It also appears from the explanatory notes that in connection with the tender procedure the Guarantee Fund will be able to provide an unlimited guarantee in relation to the commitments of the credit institution in jeopardy until winding up and transfer have taken place. This guarantee will prevent a "run" on a credit institution in jeopardy which is expected to continue to operate during the winding up period.
Concerning proposal for an Act on Financial Enterprises
The proposal is described in further detail on p. 63.
On 5 January 2001 Danmarks Nationalbank submitted the following consultation response:
On the basis of the greater integration of the financial markets, including the formation of financial
conglomerates, it has been deemed necessary to implement a new structure for the financial supervisory
acts. The aim is to ensure that similar financial products are treated in the same way and to introduce a
number of measures to simplify and modernise this area. The restructuring of the financial supervisory acts
is the response to the recommendation to this effect in Report no. 1376 entitled "The Financial Sector after
the Year 2000" by the Committee on the Financial Sector after the Year 2000 of the Ministry of
Economic Affairs.
The bill compiles the supervisory provisions and other statutory areas. In general, Danmarks Nationalbank endorses this legislation initiative and finds that the preparation of a joint act will simplify the structure of the provisions and be the first step towards ensuring that similar financial products are treated in the same way to a higher degree within the various financial areas.
Danmarks Nationalbank has noted that the special characteristics of the various financial sectors are preserved in the sector-specific acts, but that there are plans subsequently to review the remaining elements of the financial acts with a view to achieving an even more uniform structure and further simplification of e.g. the provisions on establishment of financial enterprises, permission to carry on financial activities, solvency, mergers, etc.
Danmarks Nationalbank finds that this is a unique opportunity to create a more forward-looking and pertinent legal basis for the financial sector. This should take place on the basis of careful preparation within a reasonable time frame.
In connection with the compilation a number of provisions are adjusted or updated.
In connection with the compiling of the provisions on good practice in Chapter 2 a new provision is introduced whereby the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority may stipulate rules on good practice within different areas of activity. In the explanatory notes to the bill it is emphasised that the guidelines must be issued in close cooperation with trade and consumer organisations. In this connection it must be ensured that regulations to the same effect are not issued by several public authorities.
Chapter 4 on management rules generally constitutes a compilation of the existing rules, while maintaining the sector-specific provisions. These rules account for almost one third of the act, and modernisation and simplification of the rules may therefore be considered. Such rules are also unique to Denmark, and are the result of proliferation over many years. There may be cases of dual regulation after the introduction of "fit and proper" provisions based on the directives.
The accounting provisions in Chapter 6 are to the highest possible degree formulated to accord with parallel provisions in the concurrent annual accounts bill. This provides for uniform accounting policies and rules for companies in the financial sector and other companies. In more technical terms, the provisions are amended from transaction-based accounts to value-based accounts. As a result, the actual evaluation of assets and liabilities (fair-value principle) will play a more important role.
Danmarks Nationalbank endorses the general introduction of the new accounting policies in line with international development, with a view to national and international harmonisation of accounting provisions. The provisions on presentation of accounts applying to Danish financial enterprises should be updated on a continuous basis to correspond to European accounting standards for equivalent enterprises. However, it must be emphasised that in certain important respects the international provisions are less advanced than the proposed Danish provisions.
At the same time, all the implications of the new provisions must be identified. Danmarks Nationalbank therefore endorses postponement of the entry into force until the work of the proposed committee is completed, including in particular the implications of the fair-value principle for the level of provisions in connection with lending, including incentives for provisions to be made.
Danmarks Nationalbank also supports the abolishment of the dual auditor system. In this connection it is significant that the proposal is recommended by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority and that there is not considered to be any need to introduce other provisions to ensure the independence of auditors.
Danmarks Nationalbank has no further comments on the bill.
Concerning proposal for an Act on Electronic Money
Institutions
The bill is intended to implement directive 2000/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of
18 September 2000 on the taking-up, pursuit of and prudential supervision of the business of electronic
money institutions. The directive is described in further detail on p. 148. In contrast to the directive, the bill
proposes that the maximum limit for issue of electronic money by electronic money institutions shall be
euro 300. This should be viewed against the background that electronic money must be regarded as an
electronic substitute for coins and banknotes stored on an electronic device and normally used for
electronic payments of limited amounts. Furthermore, the proposal applies a lower limit to amounts to be
exempted from the scope of the directive. The bill is based on the current rules on issuers of prepaid cards
in the Act on Savings Institutions and Issuers of Prepaid Cards. This entails that the bill does not introduce
provisions on supervision in an area not already subject to regulation.
On 1 December 2000 Danmarks Nationalbank submitted the following consultation response:
This bill implements directive 2000/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18
September 2000 on the taking-up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money
institutions.
The directive is intended to harmonise the provisions on the taking-up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions, providing for the granting of a single licence recognised throughout the Community, in compliance with the principle of home country prudential supervision.
In connection with regulation of electronic money institutions, Danmarks Nationalbank finds it important to ensure that the elements of financial legislation are necessary and sufficient as regards the supply of electronic money and the management of the associated risks.
In this connection the maximum limit stipulated in Section 3 of the bill of euro 300 for amounts stored in the electronic devices is confusing, since this limit is not stipulated in the directive. The limit would apply only to Danish electronic money institutions, whereas no limits would apply to electronic money institutions licensed in other EU member states as regards cross-border activities.
Furthermore, Danmarks Nationalbank notes that Section 1, subsection 5 of the bill applies lower limits to amounts to be exempted than stated in the directive.
Danmarks Nationalbank has no further comments on the bill.
Concerning proposal for amendment of the Act on Danish
Commercial Banks and Savings Banks, etc., the Mortgage
Credit Act and the Act on Investment Companies
The two central elements of the bills are the access to use internal models and the specification that
subordinate capital is not included in the calculation of a bank's capital solvency. Under the CAD II
directive of 1998 the authorities may implement legislation allowing financial institutions to use internal
models to calculate the capital adequacy requirement for exposure to market risk. The background to this
amendment is that certain institutions have developed sophisticated Value-at-Risk (VaR) models for more
accurate measurement of market risks in comparison to the current standard method today available to the
institutions. The option to use internal models gives the banks a stronger incentive to develop risk
management models.
On 29 November 2000 Danmarks Nationalbank submitted the following consultation response:
Danmarks Nationalbank endorses the granting of access for financial institutions to use internal models in
accordance with the CAD II directive in their calculation of weighted items exposed to market risk. This
enhances the incentives for financial institutions to apply good risk management models. Danmarks
Nationalbank finds it important to emphasise that the bill adheres to the spirit of the CAD II directive in
that the level of capital adequacy level is not affected.
Furthermore, Danmarks Nationalbank welcomes the specification of the concept of insolvency whereby future issue of subordinate capital are not included the compilation of solvency. This is in accordance with the recommendation most recently stated in the report entitled "The Financial Sector after the Year 2000".
Concerning proposal for amendment of the Act on Taxation of
Pension Yields
This proposal is described in further detail on p. 62.
On 10 November 2000 Danmarks Nationalbank submitted the following consultation response:
In a letter of 1 November 2000 the Ministry of Economic Affairs submitted the bill to amend the Act on
Insurance Activities, the Labour Market Supplementary Pension Fund Act, the Act on the Employees'
Capital Pension Fund and the Occupational Safety Act to Danmarks Nationalbank for consultation. The
bill should be viewed in conjunction with the bill to amend the Act on Taxation of Pension Yields, the
Capital Gains Act and the Corporate Tax Act. Danmarks Nationalbank's comments apply to the entire
legislative package.
Danmarks Nationalbank welcomes the fact that the package seeks to simplify the taxation of pension yields by introducing a uniform tax and providing for more unrestricted planning of investment policies by pension institutions. The expected expansion of the prudential supervision by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority of the total balance-sheet structure of the pension institutions and their risk management is seen as an important supplement to the less restricted investment opportunities.
In this connection special attention should be drawn to the considerable risk assumed by the pension institutions on providing nominal after-tax interest-rate guarantees, and also to how this risk is hedged.
Concerning proposal to amend the Securities Trading Act
The proposal is described in further detail on p. 151f.
On 1 September Danmarks Nationalbank submitted the following consultation response:
The bill provides for the acceptance of a member from a non-EU/EEA member state to a stock exchange
or a central securities depository, subject to approval by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority.
Danmarks Nationalbank endorses extended access to stock exchanges and central securities depositories in order to ensure free competition and an efficient market.
In connection with the implementation of the investment services directive and Stock Exchange Reform II in 1995, providing for remote membership of the Copenhagen Stock Exchange for EU institutions, this development was welcomed, but it was emphasised that a "level playing field" should be ensured. It was especially emphasised that the institutions should be subject to joint European regulations on capital adequacy, and that they should observe the current rules for trading in the marketplace and that sanctions could be imposed in the event of non-compliance.
These considerations will in particular also apply to third-country members.
In addition it must be ensured in particular that provisions on insider trading and price manipulation are in force and enforceable in the relevant countries prior to membership of the Copenhagen Stock Exchange.
In accordance with the principle of reciprocity Danish institutions must also be granted access to a stock exchange or a central securities depository in the relevant country.
Furthermore, Danmarks Nationalbank endorses the extension of the prohibitions on insider trading and price manipulation to include securities accepted for listing or trading on stock exchanges, or which are traded in another regulated marketplace outside the EU/EEA. In view of the greater internationalisation and the rapid technological progress "national borders" no longer apply in the fight against insider trading and price manipulation, since the securities market is regarded as a global market. There is thus a need for "global" provisions against abuse of insider knowledge and price manipulation, in order to enhance confidence in the market.
Furthermore, Danmarks Nationalbank welcomes the bill's provisions to grant access to use the right of pledge/collateral in connection with settlement in registered payment systems and Danmarks Nationalbank's own systems. This will contribute to reducing the systemic risks in the systems, to the benefit of financial stability.
Danmarks Nationalbank has no further comments on the bill.
Table 1 Annual accounts and monthly balance sheets of Danmarks Nationalbank
Table 2a Specification of banknotes in circulation
Table 2b Issue of new banknotes
Table 3a Specification of coin in circulation
Table 3b Production of coins (minting)
Table 4 The balances of the banks and mortgage-credit institutes with the Nationalbank
Table 5 Money stock
Table 6 The official interest rates of Danmarks Nationalbank
Table 7a The official interest rates of the European Central Bank
Table 7b Eurosystem monetary policy operations allotted though tenders
Table 8 The foreign-exchange reserve
Table 9 Principal items of the balance of payment (net revenues)
Table 10 Denmark's foreign assets and liabilities
Table 11 Denmark's account with the International Monetary Fund
Table 12 Central rate and fluctuation band vis-à-vis euro in ERM II
Table 13 Conversion rates to euro
Table 14 Exchange rates
Table 15 Exchange rates for euro area member states
Danmarks Nationalbank's Publications and Danish bank holidays other than saturdays and sundays
Table 1 Annual accounts and monthly balance sheets of Danmarks Nationalbank
| Kr. million | Assets | Kr. million | Kr. million | Liabilities | Mio.kr. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock of gold |
Foreign assets |
Assets deposited with the Euro- pean Monetary Institute |
Net assets with the IMF1 |
Lending2 | Bonds and shares3 |
Government guarantee for coin in circulation4 |
Guarantees5 | Other assets, etc.6 |
Total | Notes in circula- tion |
Coin in circula- tion |
Foreign liabilities |
Contribution to allocation of SDRs in the IMF1 |
Deposits2 | Certificates of deposit2 |
Central Government7 |
Guarantees5 | Other liabilities6 |
General Capital Fund and Statutory Reserve |
Value Adjustment Reserve |
General Reserves |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1990 | 3,720 | 52,707 | 5,200 | 3,053 | 6,246 | 37,717 | 639 | 569 | 18,469 | 128,320 | 1990 | 1990 | 24,453 | 2,530 | 1,361 | 1,470 | 13,114 | | 38,405 | 569 | 17,362 | 300 | | 28,756 | 128,320 | 1990 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1991 | 3,464 | 38,588 | 2,814 | 3,585 | 5,320 | 44,361 | 639 | 433 | 12,327 | 111,531 | 1991 | 1991 | 25,565 | 2,646 | 3,888 | 1,514 | 18,125 | | 16,010 | 433 | 10,698 | 300 | | 32,352 | 111,531 | 1991 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1992 | 3,456 | 63,540 | 2,757 | 3,503 | 29,132 | 32,018 | 539 | | 3,327 | 138,272 | 1992 | 1992 | 25,391 | 2,629 | 28,292 | 1,539 | 4,800 | 5,743 | 35,075 | | 495 | 300 | | 34,008 | 138,272 | 1992 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1993 | 4,339 | 62,818 | 4,947 | 3,456 | 81,689 | 41,235 | 539 | | 4,502 | 203,525 | 1993 | 1993 | 26,880 | 2,776 | 790 | 1,664 | 5,455 | 27,812 | 94,548 | | 573 | 300 | | 42,727 | 203,525 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1994 | 3,790 | 44,658 | 3,460 | 3,723 | 61,749 | 39,505 | | | 2,274 | 159,159 | 1994 | 1994 | 29,708 | 2,980 | 1,537 | 1,589 | 4,591 | 25,979 | 56,910 | | 1,080 | 300 | | 34,485 | 159,159 | 1994 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1995 | 3,531 | 53,577 | 4,521 | 4,177 | 49,670 | 34,096 | | | 2,348 | 151,920 | 1995 | 1995 | 31,434 | 3,222 | 2,200 | 1,474 | 3,219 | 33,813 | 38,808 | | 1,523 | 300 | | 35,927 | 151,920 | 1995 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1996 | 3,652 | 73,624 | 4,979 | 4,598 | 49,659 | 35,108 | | | 2,383 | 174,003 | 1996 | 1996 | 33,187 | 3,426 | 1,634 | 1,527 | 28,068 | 30,865 | 34,995 | | 1,548 | 300 | 1,093 | 37,359 | 174,003 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1997 | 3,331 | 115,844 | 4,790 | 6,602 | 37,116 | 33,766 | | | 2,822 | 204,271 | 1997 | 1997 | 35,079 | 3,631 | 876 | 1,648 | 33,863 | 52,738 | 33,954 | | 1,333 | 300 | 2,107 | 38,742 | 204,271 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1998 | 3,934 | 89,416 | | 9,330 | 40,225 | 37,487 | | | 2,402 | 182,794 | 1998 | 1998 | 37,199 | 3,816 | 1,253 | 1,606 | 21,231 | 34,752 | 37,131 | | 2,333 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 182,794 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1999 | 4,567 | 154,715 | | 8,441 | 72,946 | 37,696 | | | 3,437 | 281,802 | 1999 | 1999 | 42,430 | 3,952 | 2,425 | 1,815 | 46,404 | 99,896 | 39,678 | | 3,445 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 281,802 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2000 | 4,683 | 110,851 | | 5,127 | 67,635 | 39,847 | | | 8,865 | 237,007 | 2000 | 2000 | 40,650 | 4,148 | 3,143 | 1,869 | 52,460 | 51,874 | 37,718 | | 729 | 300 | 1,363 | 42,753 | 237,007 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1999 | Jan | 3,936 | 104,016 | | 8,655 | 41,858 | 37,812 | | | 1,884 | 198,160 | Jan | 1999 | 1999 | Jan | 35,371 | 3,726 | 852 | 1,606 | 23,074 | 45,413 | 39,420 | | 7,548 | 300 | 2,107 | 38,742 | 198,160 | Jan | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||
| Feb | 3,938 | 116,216 | | 7,311 | 44,953 | 38,550 | | | 1,589 | 212,558 | Feb | Feb | 35,102 | 3,716 | 494 | 1,606 | 23,127 | 40,833 | 58,980 | | 7,551 | 300 | 2,107 | 38,742 | 212,558 | Feb | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March | 3,939 | 130,657 | | 7,884 | 56,227 | 39,415 | | | 1,535 | 239,657 | March | March | 35,835 | 3,741 | 656 | 1,606 | 34,618 | 50,132 | 67,480 | | 2,116 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 239,657 | March | ||||||||||||||||||||
| April | 3,939 | 131,528 | | 8,207 | 50,572 | 38,539 | | | 1,309 | 234,094 | April | April | 36,402 | 3,756 | 885 | 1,606 | 27,185 | 50,341 | 68,329 | | 2,116 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 234,094 | April | ||||||||||||||||||||
| May | 3,942 | 131,645 | | 8,262 | 43,599 | 38,859 | | | 1,493 | 227,799 | May | May | 37,002 | 3,825 | 1,177 | 1,606 | 29,112 | 49,637 | 59,320 | | 2,646 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 227,799 | May | ||||||||||||||||||||
| June | 3,942 | 148,564 | | 8,737 | 42,313 | 39,812 | | | 2,149 | 245,516 | June | June | 37,327 | 3,851 | 1,021 | 1,606 | 40,153 | 54,492 | 60,555 | | 3,038 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 245,516 | June | ||||||||||||||||||||
| July | 3,931 | 151,309 | | 5,960 | 47,768 | 38,750 | | | 1,977 | 249,695 | July | July | 37,715 | 3,843 | 732 | 1,606 | 29,831 | 58,326 | 70,544 | | 3,624 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 249,695 | July | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Aug | 3,931 | 155,503 | | 6,039 | 32,324 | 39,158 | | | 2,047 | 239,002 | Aug | Aug | 36,835 | 3,844 | 1,010 | 1,606 | 32,887 | 52,633 | 62,743 | | 3,971 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 239,002 | Aug | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sept | 3,931 | 160,471 | | 5,654 | 42,218 | 39,527 | | | 2,892 | 254,694 | Sept | Sept | 36,534 | 3,844 | 1,450 | 1,606 | 41,639 | 50,903 | 70,748 | | 4,496 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 254,694 | Sept | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Oct | 3,931 | 158,079 | | 6,129 | 52,572 | 39,718 | | | 2,684 | 263,113 | Oct | Oct | 36,641 | 3,847 | 1,836 | 1,606 | 50,544 | 56,087 | 64,142 | | 4,936 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 263,113 | Oct | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Nov | 3,931 | 160,036 | | 6,075 | 46,900 | 40,519 | | | 2,425 | 259,886 | Nov | Nov | 38,109 | 3,888 | 2,124 | 1,606 | 38,584 | 71,278 | 55,374 | | 5,449 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 259,886 | Nov | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Dec | 3,931 | 156,676 | | 7,483 | 72,946 | 39,102 | | | 2,873 | 283,010 | Dec | Dec | 42,430 | 3,952 | 2,425 | 1,606 | 46,582 | 99,896 | 36,490 | | 6,156 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 283,010 | Dec | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2000 | Jan | 4,567 | 136,478 | | 7,945 | 51,534 | 38,161 | | | 2,615 | 241,300 | Jan | 2000 | 2000 | Jan | 37,760 | 3,876 | 432 | 1,815 | 33,685 | 67,941 | 47,596 | | 4,722 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 241,300 | Jan | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Feb | 4,567 | 129,437 | | 7,960 | 44,199 | 38,694 | | | 2,595 | 227,452 | Feb | Feb | 37,333 | 3,855 | 543 | 1,815 | 35,591 | 61,642 | 38,483 | | 4,716 | 300 | 3,101 | 40,072 | 227,452 | Feb | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March | 4,567 | 126,501 | | 7,846 | 57,236 | 38,714 | | | 3,025 | 237,889 | March | March | 37,404 | 3,896 | 71 | 1,815 | 28,822 | 57,503 | 63,389 | | 3,231 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 237,889 | March | ||||||||||||||||||||
| April | 4,567 | 122,997 | | 6,691 | 81,145 | 38,673 | | | 2,863 | 256,936 | April | April | 39,585 | 3,965 | 445 | 1,815 | 30,072 | 79,787 | 55,968 | | 3,540 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 256,936 | April | ||||||||||||||||||||
| May | 4,567 | 121,543 | | 7,115 | 65,919 | 38,946 | | | 3,100 | 241,191 | May | May | 39,182 | 4,043 | 465 | 1,815 | 38,800 | 58,812 | 52,234 | | 4,082 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 241,191 | May | ||||||||||||||||||||
| June | 4,567 | 111,957 | | 7,064 | 57,203 | 39,028 | | | 3,444 | 223,262 | June | June | 39,572 | 4,055 | 755 | 1,815 | 29,281 | 47,276 | 54,355 | | 4,396 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 223,262 | June | ||||||||||||||||||||
| July | 4,567 | 109,863 | | 6,916 | 76,047 | 39,108 | | | 3,151 | 239,652 | July | July | 39,782 | 4,050 | 1,122 | 1,815 | 30,289 | 49,711 | 66,018 | | 5,107 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 239,652 | July | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Aug | 4,567 | 109,583 | | 6,971 | 83,896 | 39,411 | | | 3,328 | 247,756 | Aug | Aug | 39,154 | 4,047 | 1,729 | 1,815 | 31,659 | 64,487 | 57,406 | | 5,700 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 247,756 | Aug | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sept | 4,567 | 110,362 | | 6,894 | 102,244 | 39,764 | | | 4,588 | 268,419 | Sept | Sept | 38,545 | 4,072 | 13,748 | 1,815 | 32,879 | 65,219 | 64,214 | | 6,169 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 268,419 | Sept | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Oct | 4,567 | 119,243 | | 5,223 | 72,024 | 38,652 | | | 4,656 | 244,365 | Oct | Oct | 38,307 | 4,055 | 2,257 | 1,815 | 41,119 | 48,867 | 59,766 | | 6,419 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 244,365 | Oct | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Nov | 4,567 | 116,641 | | 5,213 | 68,456 | 39,192 | | | 4,561 | 238,631 | Nov | Nov | 38,890 | 4,074 | 2,767 | 1,815 | 38,170 | 66,266 | 37,982 | | 6,911 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 238,631 | Nov | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Dec | 4,567 | 116,138 | | 4,777 | 67,642 | 39,725 | | | 4,970 | 237,818 | Dec | Dec | 40,650 | 4,148 | 3,143 | 1,815 | 52,453 | 51,874 | 34,651 | | 7,325 | 300 | 20 | 41,439 | 237,818 | Dec | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 2a Specification of banknotes in circulation
| Kr. million | 1000-kr. | 500-kr. | 200-kr. | 100-kr. | 50-kr. | Total1 | Total, mio.pieces |
||
| 1990 | 13,167 | 3,688 | | 6,544 | 588 | 23,987 | 97 | ||
| 1991 | 14,029 | 3,851 | | 6,668 | 629 | 25,177 | 100 | ||
| 1992 | 14,164 | 3,806 | | 6,402 | 618 | 24,990 | 97 | ||
| 1993 | 15,386 | 3,983 | | 6,495 | 655 | 26,519 | 101 | ||
| 1994 | 17,294 | 4,693 | | 6,646 | 695 | 29,328 | 107 | ||
| 1995 | 18,238 | 5,307 | | 6,759 | 737 | 31,041 | 111 | ||
| 1996 | 19,280 | 5,819 | | 6,926 | 778 | 32,803 | 116 | ||
| 1997 | 19,589 | 6,556 | 1,618 | 6,119 | 799 | 34,681 | 118 | ||
| 1998 | 19,787 | 8,088 | 2,182 | 5,881 | 851 | 36,789 | 123 | ||
| 1999 | 22,978 | 9,272 | 2,534 | 6,339 | 904 | 42,026 | 136 | ||
| 2000 | 22,049 | 8,789 | 2,688 | 5,825 | 917 | 40,268 | 130 | ||
|
|||||||||
Table 2b Issue of new banknotes
| Kr. million | 1000-kr. | 500-kr. | 200-kr. | 100-kr. | 50-kr. | Total | ||
| 1990 | 4,690 | 2,185 | | 6,244 | 622 | 14,049 | ||
| 1991 | 4,535 | 1,630 | | 4,408 | 679 | 11,538 | ||
| 1992 | 3,260 | 2,151 | | 1,973 | 612 | 7,995 | ||
| 1993 | 5,663 | 1,925 | | 2,659 | 761 | 11,008 | ||
| 1994 | 5,319 | 3,102 | | 3,721 | 757 | 12,899 | ||
| 1995 | 3,666 | 2,673 | | 6,397 | 870 | 13,605 | ||
| 1996 | 3,021 | 1,435 | | 3,556 | 800 | 8,812 | ||
| 1997 | 1,739 | 6,5181 | 2,5061 | 2,048 | 886 | 13,696 | ||
| 1998 | 10,5861 | 1,859 | 841 | 2,114 | 662 | 16,063 | ||
| 1999 | 10,139 | 2,303 | 611 | 5,5391 | 1,0921 | 19,683 | ||
| 2000 | 1,216 | 1,425 | 883 | 2,696 | 506 | 6,726 | ||
|
||||||||
Table 3a Specification of coin in circulation
| Kr. million | 20-kr. | 10-kr. | 5-kr. | 2-kr. | 1-kr. | 50-øre | 25-øre | Total1 | Total, mio.pieces |
||
| 1990 | 746 | 601 | 392 | | 459 | 64 | 126 | 2,388 | 1,267 | ||
| 1991 | 845 | 596 | 392 | | 467 | 77 | 131 | 2,508 | 1,325 | ||
| 1992 | 893 | 599 | 394 | | 471 | 88 | 134 | 2,579 | 1,268 | ||
| 1993 | 932 | 613 | 399 | 170 | 381 | 94 | 138 | 2,727 | 1,393 | ||
| 1994 | 1,013 | 656 | 421 | 214 | 378 | 105 | 145 | 2,932 | 1,476 | ||
| 1995 | 1,122 | 697 | 442 | 248 | 385 | 112 | 152 | 3,158 | 1,555 | ||
| 1996 | 1,211 | 738 | 462 | 280 | 393 | 121 | 158 | 3,363 | 1,635 | ||
| 1997 | 1,299 | 773 | 483 | 310 | 401 | 126 | 163 | 3,555 | 1,700 | ||
| 1998 | 1,371 | 813 | 504 | 337 | 413 | 134 | 169 | 3,741 | 1,774 | ||
| 1999 | 1,421 | 842 | 523 | 358 | 422 | 139 | 171 | 3,876 | 1,823 | ||
| 2000 | 1,522 | 874 | 540 | 374 | 435 | 141 | 175 | 4,060 | 1,876 | ||
| |||||||||||
Table 3b Production of coins (minting)
| Kr. million | 20-kr. | 10-kr. | 5-kr. | 2-kr. | 1-kr. | 50-øre | 25-øre | Total | ||
| 1990 | 707 | 122 | 234 | | 0 | 32 | 27 | 1,122 | ||
| 1991 | 231 | 10 | 19 | | 45 | 6 | 26 | 337 | ||
| 1992 | 20 | 5 | 12 | 83 | 82 | 7 | 2 | 211 | ||
| 1993 | 13 | 11 | 8 | 88 | 16 | 7 | 4 | 147 | ||
| 1994 | 51 | 41 | 40 | 55 | 24 | 12 | 9 | 232 | ||
| 1995 | 72 | 94 | 29 | 40 | 35 | 8 | 10 | 288 | ||
| 1996 | 193 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 11 | 239 | ||
| 1997 | 48 | 37 | 26 | 53 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 185 | ||
| 1998 | 79 | 60 | 32 | 9 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 204 | ||
| 1999 | 83 | 40 | 24 | 41 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 206 | ||
| 2000 | 21 | 0 | 14 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 4 | 88 | ||
| ||||||||||
Table 4 The balances of the banks and mortgage-credit institutes with the Nationalbank
| Kr. million | Certificates of deposit1 |
Deposits | Loans2 | Total net position |
Lending concerning cash depots |
Bond repurchase accounts3 |
|||||||||
| 1990 | | 1,748 | 3,055 | -1,307 | 1,013 | 8,764 | |||||||||
| 1991 | | 14,369 | 5 | 14,364 | 1,085 | 2,016 | |||||||||
| 1992 | 5,741 | 3,338 | 23,781 | -14,702 | 1,073 | | |||||||||
| 1993 | 27,783 | 3,387 | 77,937 | -46,767 | 1,267 | | |||||||||
| 1994 | 25,851 | 2,685 | 55,937 | -27,401 | 1,338 | | |||||||||
| 1995 | 33,570 | 1,867 | 43,969 | -8,532 | 1,361 | | |||||||||
| 1996 | 30,617 | 15,215 | 33,735 | 12,097 | 1,438 | | |||||||||
| 1997 | 52,111 | 17,976 | 19,817 | 50,270 | 1,655 | | |||||||||
| 1998 | 34,218 | 12,407 | 29,587 | 17,038 | 2,912 | | |||||||||
| 1999 | 99,447 | 5,949 | 33,027 | 72,369 | 4,991 | | |||||||||
| 2000 | 51,169 | 7,822 | 25,165 | 33,826 | 2,677 | | |||||||||
| 1999 | Jan | 44,673 | 2,114 | 21,790 | 24,997 | 2,196 | | ||||||||
| Feb | 40,251 | 3,276 | 26,184 | 17,343 | 2,280 | | |||||||||
| March | 49,234 | 3,545 | 26,068 | 26,711 | 1,783 | | |||||||||
| April | 49,622 | 3,424 | 27,543 | 25,503 | 2,021 | | |||||||||
| May | 49,011 | 7,662 | 22,850 | 33,823 | 2,478 | | |||||||||
| June | 53,585 | 18,169 | 21,575 | 50,179 | 2,426 | | |||||||||
| July | 57,859 | 4,762 | 24,454 | 38,167 | 2,630 | | |||||||||
| Aug | 51,695 | 13,034 | 14,433 | 50,296 | 2,580 | | |||||||||
| Sept | 50,235 | 19,623 | 22,169 | 47,689 | 2,479 | | |||||||||
| Oct | 55,566 | 16,627 | 21,404 | 50,789 | 2,246 | | |||||||||
| Nov | 70,792 | 13,616 | 24,493 | 59,915 | 3,051 | | |||||||||
| Dec | 99,447 | 5,959 | 33,027 | 72,379 | 4,991 | | |||||||||
| 2000 | Jan | 67,309 | 6,904 | 27,409 | 46,804 | 2,714 | | ||||||||
| Feb | 61,083 | 15,948 | 27,313 | 49,718 | 2,793 | | |||||||||
| March | 56,819 | 3,435 | 34,829 | 25,425 | 2,098 | | |||||||||
| April | 79,246 | 4,681 | 57,635 | 26,292 | 3,286 | | |||||||||
| May | 58,135 | 16,020 | 45,830 | 28,325 | 2,542 | | |||||||||
| June | 46,384 | 5,531 | 35,647 | 16,268 | 2,469 | | |||||||||
| July | 49,114 | 8,424 | 55,748 | 1,790 | 2,885 | | |||||||||
| Aug | 63,794 | 7,579 | 61,973 | 9,400 | 3,086 | | |||||||||
| Sept | 64,657 | 5,928 | 77,652 | -7,067 | 2,707 | | |||||||||
| Oct | 48,281 | 15,310 | 48,696 | 14,895 | 2,461 | | |||||||||
| Nov | 65,619 | 11,107 | 43,776 | 32,950 | 2,514 | | |||||||||
| Dec | 51,169 | 7,817 | 25,173 | 33,813 | 2,677 | | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Table 5 Money stock
| Kr. billion | Notes and coin1 |
Deposits with the banks2 | Money stock |
Year-on-year increase in money stock |
|||||||||||
| On demand | At notice | Time deposits3 | |||||||||||||
| 1990 | 23.6 | 202.8 | 42.4 | 122.2 | 391.0 | 6.3 | |||||||||
| 1991 | 24.2 | 224.7 | 36.9 | 93.1 | 379.0 | 4.2 | |||||||||
| 1992 | 25.0 | 218.5 | 33.6 | 97.6 | 374.6 | - 1.2 | |||||||||
| 1993 | 25.8 | 246.4 | 29.7 | 114.7 | 416.6 | 11.2 | |||||||||
| 1994 | 28.9 | 243.4 | 27.0 | 94.6 | 394.0 | - 5.4 | |||||||||
| 1995 | 30.6 | 251.7 | 31.8 | 96.0 | 410.1 | 4.1 | |||||||||
| 1996 | 31.6 | 278.4 | 32.8 | 97.0 | 439.8 | 7.2 | |||||||||
| 1997 | 33.2 | 295.1 | 30.8 | 103.4 | 462.6 | 5.2 | |||||||||
| 1998 | 34.5 | 316.8 | 30.7 | 94.7 | 476.7 | 2.9 | |||||||||
| 1999 | 36.9 | 334.6 | 28.8 | 96.6 | 496.9 | 4.2 | |||||||||
| 2000 | 37.7 | 345.4 | 23.8 | 99.1 | 505.9 | 1.8 | |||||||||
| 1999 | Jan | 33.6 | 332.4 | 30.4 | 109.2 | 505.5 | 4.1 | ||||||||
| Feb | 33.4 | 327.3 | 31.4 | 104.4 | 496.5 | 4.9 | |||||||||
| March | 34.3 | 321.8 | 30.6 | 99.6 | 486.3 | 6.1 | |||||||||
| April | 34.9 | 348.7 | 31.5 | 101.0 | 516.1 | 4.3 | |||||||||
| May | 34.7 | 353.6 | 32.5 | 93.6 | 514.3 | 5.7 | |||||||||
| June | 34.9 | 337.1 | 29.4 | 93.4 | 494.7 | 6.3 | |||||||||
| July | 35.4 | 351.5 | 29.3 | 105.8 | 522.1 | 3.7 | |||||||||
| Aug | 34.4 | 352.9 | 32.2 | 99.7 | 519.2 | 5.8 | |||||||||
| Sept | 34.5 | 338.2 | 29.4 | 101.7 | 503.8 | 2.6 | |||||||||
| Oct | 34.9 | 348.0 | 29.8 | 107.4 | 520.1 | 2.0 | |||||||||
| Nov | 35.0 | 344.6 | 29.2 | 106.5 | 515.3 | 6.5 | |||||||||
| Dec | 36.9 | 334.7 | 28.8 | 96.4 | 496.8 | 4.3 | |||||||||
| 2000 | Jan | 35.3 | 342.2 | 29.0 | 101.9 | 508.3 | 0.6 | ||||||||
| Feb | 34.8 | 338.7 | 28.5 | 102.3 | 504.3 | 1.6 | |||||||||
| March | 35.8 | 339.9 | 26.1 | 100.7 | 502.6 | 3.4 | |||||||||
| April | 36.2 | 348.0 | 26.3 | 99.4 | 509.9 | -1.2 | |||||||||
| May | 36.7 | 349.6 | 25.7 | 110.4 | 522.4 | 1.6 | |||||||||
| June | 37.1 | 341.8 | 25.6 | 102.9 | 507.4 | 2.6 | |||||||||
| July | 36.6 | 346.7 | 25.5 | 112.5 | 521.3 | -0.2 | |||||||||
| Aug | 36.1 | 345.3 | 24.6 | 121.7 | 527.8 | 1.7 | |||||||||
| Sept | 36.2 | 349.6 | 20.8 | 114.5 | 521.1 | 3.4 | |||||||||
| Oct | 35.6 | 359.3 | 21.4 | 117.2 | 533.5 | 2.6 | |||||||||
| Nov | 36.4 | 346.5 | 23.2 | 111.9 | 518.1 | 0.5 | |||||||||
| Dec | 37.7 | 345.4 | 23.8 | 99.1 | 515.9 | 1.8 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Table 6 The official interest rates of Danmarks Nationalbank
| Per cent per annum | Discount rate |
Current account desposits1 |
Lending and certifi- cates of deposit2 |
|||||||
| 1991 | 9.50 | 9.50 | | |||||||
| 1992 | 9.50 | 9.50 | 13.00 | |||||||
| 1993 | 6.25 | 6.25 | 6.75 | |||||||
| 1994 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | |||||||
| 1995 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 4.60 | |||||||
| 1996 | 3.25 | 3.25 | 3.50 | |||||||
| 1997 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.75 | |||||||
| 1998 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.95 | |||||||
| 1994 | 6. Jan. | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.50 | ||||||
| 19. - | 5.75 | 5.75 | 6.25 | |||||||
| 18. Feb. | 5.50 | 5.50 | 6.00 | |||||||
| 15. April | 5.25 | 5.25 | 5.90 | |||||||
| 2. May | 5.80 | |||||||||
| 11. - | 5.70 | |||||||||
| 13. - | 5.00 | 5.00 | ||||||||
| 19. - | 5.60 | |||||||||
| 7. July | 5.50 | |||||||||
| 1995 | 8. March | 6.00 | 6.00 | 7.00 | ||||||
| 6. April | 6.75 | |||||||||
| 27. - | 6.50 | |||||||||
| 18. May | 6.35 | |||||||||
| 6. July | 5.75 | 5.75 | 6.20 | |||||||
| 27. - | 6.05 | |||||||||
| 3. Aug. | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.90 | |||||||
| 25. - | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.65 | |||||||
| 7. Sept. | 5.50 | |||||||||
| 28. - | 5.40 | |||||||||
| 5. Oct. | 5.30 | |||||||||
| 9. Nov. | 4.75 | 4.75 | 5.15 | |||||||
| 23. Nov. | 4.75 | 4.75 | 5.00 | |||||||
| 15. Dec. | 4.25 | 4.25 | 4.75 | |||||||
| 28. - | 4.60 | |||||||||
| 1996 | 11. Jan. | 4.50 | ||||||||
| 25. - | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.35 | |||||||
| 8. Feb. | 4.25 | |||||||||
| 7. March | 3.75 | 3.75 | 4.10 | |||||||
| 21. - | 4.00 | |||||||||
| 1. April | 3.90 | |||||||||
| 19. - | 3.25 | 3.25 | 3.80 | |||||||
| 6. Juni | 3.70 | |||||||||
| 23. Aug. | 3.50 | |||||||||
| 1997 | 10. Oct. | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.75 | ||||||
| 1998 | 6. May | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.25 | ||||||
| 29. - | 3.75 | 3.75 | 4.00 | |||||||
| 21. Sept. | 4.25 | 4.25 | 5.00 | |||||||
| 8. Oct. | 4.75 | |||||||||
| 22. - | 4.65 | |||||||||
| 5. Nov. | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.40 | |||||||
| 26. - | 4.25 | |||||||||
| 4. Dec. | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.95 | |||||||
| 1999 | 7. Jan. | 3.75 | ||||||||
| 4. Feb. | 3.25 | 3.25 | 3.50 | |||||||
| 1. March | 3.40 | |||||||||
| 9. Apr. | 2.75 | 2.75 | 2.90 | |||||||
| 17. June | 2.85 | |||||||||
| 5. Nov. | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.30 | |||||||
| 2000 | 4. Feb. | 3.25 | 3.25 | 3.60 | ||||||
| 17. March | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.85 | |||||||
| 28. April | 3.75 | 3.75 | 4.10 | |||||||
| 9. June | 4.25 | 4.25 | 4.70 | |||||||
| 23. Aug | 4.90 | |||||||||
| 30. - | 5.10 | |||||||||
| 1. Sept | 4.50 | 4.50 | ||||||||
| 6. - | 5.00 | |||||||||
| 27. - | 5.10 | |||||||||
| 29. - | 5.60 | |||||||||
| 6. Oct | 4.75 | 4.75 | ||||||||
| 13. - | 5.50 | |||||||||
| 27. - | 5.40 | |||||||||
| 2001 | 9. Feb | 5.30 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||
Table 7a The official interest rates of the European Central Bank
| With effect from1) | Deposit facility | Main refinancing operations | Marginal lending facility |
||||||||||
| Fixed rate tenders | Variable rate tenders |
||||||||||||
| Fixed rate | Minimum bid rate | ||||||||||||
| 1999 | 1. Jan | 2.00 | 3.00 | - | 4.50 | ||||||||
| 4. - 2) | 2.75 | 3.00 | - | 3.25 | |||||||||
| 22. - | 2.00 | 3.00 | - | 4.50 | |||||||||
| 9. Apr | 1.50 | 2.50 | - | 3.50 | |||||||||
| 5. Nov | 2.00 | 3.00 | - | 4.00 | |||||||||
| 2000 | 4. Feb | 2.25 | 3.25 | - | 4.25 | ||||||||
| 17. March | 2.50 | 3.50 | - | 4.50 | |||||||||
| 28. Apr | 2.75 | 3.75 | - | 4.75 | |||||||||
| 9. June | 3.25 | 4.25 | - | 5.25 | |||||||||
| 28. - 3) | 3.25 | - | 4.25 | 5.25 | |||||||||
| 1. Sep | 3.50 | - | 4.50 | 5.50 | |||||||||
| 6. Oct | 3.75 | - | 4.75 | 5.75 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Table 7b Eurosystem monetary policy operations allotted though tenders
| Date of settlement | Variabel rate tenders | Date of settlement | Variabel rate tenders | ||||||||
| Minimum bid rate | Marginal rate | Minimum bid rate | Marginal rate | ||||||||
| 2000 | 28. June | 4.25 | 4.29 | 2000 | 1. Nov | 4.75 | 4.84 | ||||
| 5. July | 4.29 | 8. - | 4.83 | ||||||||
| 12. - | 4.29 | 15. - | 4.78 | ||||||||
| 19. - | 4.29 | 22. - | 4.80 | ||||||||
| 26. - | 4.30 | 29. - | 4.82 | ||||||||
| 2. Aug | 4.31 | 6. Dec | 4.75 | ||||||||
| 9. - | 4.30 | 13. - | 4.76 | ||||||||
| 16. - | 4.35 | 20. - | 4.80 | ||||||||
| 23. - | 4.47 | 27. - | 4.79 | ||||||||
| 30. - | 4.68 | 2001 | 3. Jan | 4.76 | |||||||
| 6. Sep | 4.50 | 4.55 | 10. - | 4.75 | |||||||
| 13. - | 4.58 | 17. - | 4.75 | ||||||||
| 20. - | 4.56 | 24. - | 4.75 | ||||||||
| 27. - | 4.65 | 31. - | 4.76 | ||||||||
| 4. Oct | 4.67 | 7. Feb | 4.75 | ||||||||
| 11. - | 4.75 | 4.76 | 14. - | 4.75 | |||||||
| 18. - | 4.75 | 21. - | 4.78 | ||||||||
| 25. - | 4.80 | 26. - | 4.78 | ||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Table 8 The foreign-exchange reserve
| Kr. million | Stock of Gold |
Foreign assets |
Assets deposited with the European Monetary Institute |
Special Drawing Rights (SDR) |
Reserve position in the IMF1 |
Total gross |
Foreign liabilities |
Total net2 |
|||||||
| 1990 | 3,720 | 52,707 | 5,200 | 1,246 | 1,807 | 64,680 | 1,361 | 63,319 | |||||||
| 1991 | 3,464 | 38,588 | 2,814 | 1,430 | 2,155 | 48,451 | 3,888 | 44,563 | |||||||
| 1992 | 3,456 | 63,540 | 2,757 | 528 | 2,975 | 73,256 | 28,292 | 44,964 | |||||||
| 1993 | 4,339 | 62,818 | 4,947 | 580 | 2,876 | 75,560 | 790 | 74,770 | |||||||
| 1994 | 3,790 | 44,658 | 3,460 | 1,107 | 2,616 | 55,631 | 1,537 | 54,094 | |||||||
| 1995 | 3,531 | 53,577 | 4,521 | 880 | 3,297 | 65,806 | 2,200 | 63,606 | |||||||
| 1996 | 3,652 | 73,624 | 4,979 | 997 | 3,601 | 86,853 | 1,634 | 85,219 | |||||||
| 1997 | 3,331 | 115,844 | 4,790 | 2,291 | 4,311 | 130,567 | 876 | 129,691 | |||||||
| 1998 | 3,934 | 89,416 | | 2,208 | 7,122 | 102,680 | 1,253 | 101,427 | |||||||
| 1999 | 4,567 | 154,715 | | 2,536 | 5,905 | 167,724 | 2,425 | 165,299 | |||||||
| 2000 | 4,683 | 110,851 | | 528 | 4,599 | 120,661 | 3,143 | 117,517 | |||||||
| 1999 | Jan | 3,936 | 104,016 | | 1,676 | 6,978 | 116,606 | 852 | 115,754 | ||||||
| Feb | 3,938 | 116,216 | | 438 | 6,873 | 127,465 | 494 | 126,971 | |||||||
| March | 3,939 | 130,657 | | 1,237 | 6,647 | 142,480 | 656 | 141,824 | |||||||
| April | 3,939 | 131,528 | | 1,895 | 6,312 | 143,674 | 885 | 142,789 | |||||||
| May | 3,942 | 131,645 | | 1,949 | 6,312 | 143,848 | 1,177 | 142,671 | |||||||
| June | 3,942 | 148,564 | | 2,263 | 6,473 | 161,242 | 1,021 | 160,221 | |||||||
| July | 3,931 | 151,309 | | 216 | 5,743 | 161,199 | 732 | 160,467 | |||||||
| Aug | 3,931 | 155,503 | | 282 | 5,756 | 165,472 | 1,010 | 164,462 | |||||||
| Sept | 3,931 | 160,471 | | 282 | 5,371 | 170,055 | 1,450 | 168,605 | |||||||
| Oct | 3,931 | 158,079 | | 757 | 5,371 | 168,138 | 1,836 | 166,302 | |||||||
| Nov | 3,931 | 160,036 | | 792 | 5,283 | 170,042 | 2,124 | 167,918 | |||||||
| Dec | 3,931 | 156,676 | | 2,386 | 5,096 | 168,089 | 2,425 | 165,665 | |||||||
| 2000 | Jan | 4,567 | 136,478 | | 2,039 | 5,905 | 148,990 | 432 | 148,558 | ||||||
| Feb | 4,567 | 129,437 | | 2,089 | 5,871 | 141,964 | 543 | 141,421 | |||||||
| March | 4,567 | 126,501 | | 1,975 | 5,871 | 138,914 | 71 | 138,843 | |||||||
| April | 4,567 | 122,997 | | 1,453 | 5,238 | 134,255 | 445 | 133,809 | |||||||
| May | 4,567 | 121,543 | | 2,046 | 5,069 | 133,225 | 465 | 132,761 | |||||||
| June | 4,567 | 111,957 | | 1,995 | 5,069 | 123,587 | 755 | 122,832 | |||||||
| July | 4,567 | 109,863 | | 1,847 | 5,069 | 121,346 | 1,122 | 120,224 | |||||||
| Aug | 4,567 | 109,583 | | 2,368 | 4,602 | 121,121 | 1,729 | 119,392 | |||||||
| Sept | 4,567 | 110,362 | | 2,368 | 4,525 | 121,823 | 13,748 | 108,075 | |||||||
| Oct | 4,567 | 119,243 | | 704 | 4,518 | 129,033 | 2,257 | 126,776 | |||||||
| Nov | 4,567 | 116,641 | | 695 | 4,518 | 126,421 | 2,767 | 123,655 | |||||||
| Dec | 4,567 | 116,138 | | 394 | 4,382 | 125,481 | 3,143 | 122,338 | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Table 9 Principal items of the balance of payments (net revenues)
| Kr. billion | Goods (fob) | Services | Goods and services |
Wages and property income |
Current transfers |
Total current account |
|||
| 1990 | 32.6 | 11.0 | 43.6 | -32.3 | -4.3 | 7.0 | |||
| 1991 | 33.1 | 19.2 | 52.3 | -33.7 | -6.9 | 11.7 | |||
| 1992 | 44.7 | 15.5 | 60.2 | -30.2 | -7.1 | 22.9 | |||
| 1993 | 50.5 | 12.3 | 62.8 | -25.9 | -7.6 | 29.3 | |||
| 1994 | 47.2 | 4.4 | 51.5 | -24.8 | -9.1 | 17.7 | |||
| 1995 | 36.3 | 4.7 | 41.1 | -21.4 | -9.6 | 10.0 | |||
| 1996 | 43.9 | 8.4 | 52.3 | -21.9 | -11.7 | 18.7 | |||
| 1997 | 38.4 | 0.8 | 39.2 | -22.5 | -12.3 | 4.4 | |||
| 1998 | 26.2 | -3.5 | 22.7 | -18.8 | -13.6 | -9.7 | |||
| 1999 | 46.9 | 9.7 | 56.6 | -17.3 | -18.7 | 20.6 | |||
| 2000 | 50.8 | 19.1 | 69.9 | -24.8 | -25.9 | 19.1 | |||
| 1999 | Jan | 1.9 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.1 | ||
| Feb | 3.0 | 0.6 | 3.6 | -0.3 | -1.4 | 1.8 | |||
| March | 3.1 | 0.2 | 3.3 | -1.7 | -1.9 | -0.4 | |||
| April | 3.6 | 1.2 | 4.7 | -2.0 | -1.4 | 1.4 | |||
| May | 4.5 | 0.5 | 5.0 | -0.6 | -1.4 | 3.0 | |||
| June | 3.2 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 0.5 | -1.5 | 3.0 | |||
| July | 4.0 | 1.1 | 5.1 | -1.2 | -2.8 | 1.1 | |||
| Aug | 4.1 | 1.1 | 5.2 | -0.4 | -1.7 | 3.0 | |||
| Sept | 5.0 | 0.1 | 5.1 | -0.8 | -2.2 | 2.1 | |||
| Oct | 5.7 | 1.7 | 7.3 | -2.0 | -2.3 | 3.0 | |||
| Nov | 5.4 | 0.7 | 6.1 | -6.5 | -1.6 | -2.0 | |||
| Dec | 3.5 | 1.6 | 5.1 | -2.3 | 2.4 | 0.3 | |||
| 2000 | Jan | 1.3 | -1.2 | 0.1 | -1.6 | 1.1 | -0.4 | ||
| Feb | 4.1 | -0.1 | 4.0 | -1.1 | -0.8 | 2.1 | |||
| March | 3.9 | 1.1 | 4.9 | -2.1 | -1.3 | 1.6 | |||
| April | 3.5 | 0.9 | 4.4 | -4.5 | -2.2 | -2.3 | |||
| May | 5.0 | 1.9 | 6.9 | -1.1 | -1.8 | 4.0 | |||
| June | 4.2 | 0.6 | 4.7 | 1.1 | -3.0 | 2.9 | |||
| July | 5.3 | 1.5 | 6.8 | -1.2 | -2.0 | 3.5 | |||
| Aug | 4.6 | 2.5 | 7.1 | -0.4 | -3.6 | 3.1 | |||
| Sept | 6.1 | 2.5 | 8.6 | -1.6 | -2.3 | 4.7 | |||
| Oct | 4.6 | 2.5 | 7.1 | -2.8 | -3.1 | 1.3 | |||
| Nov | 3.3 | 3.5 | 6.8 | -5.5 | -3.4 | -2.1 | |||
| Dec | 5.0 | 3.3 | 8.3 | -4.0 | -3.5 | 0.8 | |||
|
|||||||||
Table 10 Denmark's foreign assets and liabilities
| Kr. billion | Public sector | Private sector | Public and private sectors, total |
Danmarks National- bank |
Total | ||||
| The central government |
Other public sector |
The banks | Other private sector |
||||||
| Assets | |||||||||
| 1991 | 16 | 1 | 291 | 271 | 579 | 48 | 628 | ||
| 1992 | 17 | 4 | 290 | 293 | 603 | 73 | 676 | ||
| 1993 | 16 | 4 | 392 | 297 | 710 | 76 | 785 | ||
| 1994 | 17 | 6 | 310 | 310 | 642 | 56 | 698 | ||
| 1995 | 14 | 9 | 318 | 310 | 651 | 66 | 717 | ||
| 1996 | 13 | 15 | 377 | 399 | 804 | 87 | 892 | ||
| 1997 | 13 | 22 | 451 | 473 | 959 | 131 | 1,090 | ||
| 1998 | 18 | 29 | 499 | 578 | 1,124 | 103 | 1,227 | ||
| 1999 | 22 | 53 | 570 | 807 | 1,451 | 168 | 1,619 | ||
| Liabilities | |||||||||
| 1991 | 223 | 18 | 289 | 426 | 956 | 4 | 960 | ||
| 1992 | 290 | 18 | 236 | 416 | 960 | 28 | 988 | ||
| 1993 | 442 | 14 | 192 | 427 | 1,075 | 1 | 1,076 | ||
| 1994 | 299 | 19 | 193 | 443 | 955 | 2 | 957 | ||
| 1995 | 331 | 16 | 195 | 439 | 981 | 2 | 983 | ||
| 1996 | 368 | 16 | 260 | 499 | 1,143 | 2 | 1,145 | ||
| 1997 | 398 | 15 | 400 | 561 | 1,374 | 1 | 1,375 | ||
| 1998 | 370 | 14 | 455 | 693 | 1,531 | 1 | 1,532 | ||
| 1999 | 337 | 12 | 579 | 863 | 1,791 | 2 | 1,793 | ||
| Net liabilities | |||||||||
| 1991 | 207 | 17 | -2 | 155 | 377 | -45 | 332 | ||
| 1992 | 273 | 14 | -54 | 123 | 357 | -45 | 312 | ||
| 1993 | 426 | 10 | -200 | 130 | 366 | -75 | 291 | ||
| 1994 | 282 | 13 | -117 | 133 | 313 | -54 | 259 | ||
| 1995 | 317 | 7 | -123 | 129 | 330 | -64 | 266 | ||
| 1996 | 355 | 1 | -117 | 100 | 338 | -85 | 253 | ||
| 1997 | 385 | -7 | -51 | 88 | 415 | -130 | 285 | ||
| 1998 | 352 | -15 | -44 | 115 | 407 | -101 | 306 | ||
| 1999 | 315 | -41 | 9 | 57 | 339 | -165 | 174 | ||
| |||||||||
Table 11 Denmark's account with the international monetary fund
| Denmark's quota in the Fund |
The Fund's holdings of Danish kroner |
Denmark's reserve position in the Fund1 |
Allocated SDR (accumulated) |
Denmark's holdings of SDR |
||||||||||
| SDR million |
Kr. million |
SDR million |
Kr. million |
SDR million |
Kr. million |
SDR million |
Kr. million |
SDR million |
Kr. million |
|||||
| 1990 | 711 | 5,844 | 491 | 4,037 | 220 | 1,807 | 179 | 1,470 | 152 | 1,246 | ||||
| 1991 | 711 | 6,018 | 456 | 3,863 | 255 | 2,155 | 179 | 1,514 | 169 | 1,430 | ||||
| 1992 | 1,070 | 9,208 | 724 | 6,233 | 346 | 2,975 | 179 | 1,539 | 61 | 528 | ||||
| 1993 | 1,070 | 9,953 | 761 | 7,077 | 309 | 2,876 | 179 | 1,664 | 62 | 580 | ||||
| 1994 | 1,070 | 9,502 | 775 | 6,886 | 295 | 2,616 | 179 | 1,589 | 125 | 1,107 | ||||
| 1995 | 1,070 | 8,818 | 670 | 5,521 | 400 | 3,297 | 179 | 1,474 | 107 | 880 | ||||
| 1996 | 1,070 | 9,134 | 648 | 5,533 | 422 | 3,601 | 179 | 1,527 | 117 | 997 | ||||
| 1997 | 1,070 | 9,856 | 602 | 5,545 | 468 | 4,311 | 179 | 1,648 | 249 | 2,291 | ||||
| 1998 | 1,070 | 9,605 | 277 | 2,483 | 793 | 7,122 | 179 | 1,606 | 246 | 2,208 | ||||
| 1999 | 1,643 | 16,667 | 1,061 | 10,762 | 582 | 5,905 | 179 | 1,815 | 250 | 2,536 | ||||
| 2000 | 1,643 | 17,167 | 1,203 | 12,568 | 440 | 4,599 | 179 | 1,869 | 51 | 528 | ||||
| ||||||||||||||