Financial Markets

 

The international interest-rate markets were generally subject to increases in 2006. Short-term interest rates typically rose more than long-term rates, so that the yield curves became flatter. The development in the US 10-year yield had a decisive impact on the development in yields in many other countries.

The US dollar weakened by approximately 11 per cent against the euro in 2006, partly due to more positive growth expectations in the euro area than in the USA.

The global stock markets rose in 2006 despite falling prices in mid-year. The price increases were relatively high in the USA, the euro area and Scandinavia, while Japanese stocks rose more moderately.

INTEREST RATES

The yield on the benchmark 10-year US government bond increased from approximately 4.4 per cent at the beginning of 2006 to approximately 4.7 per cent at year-end, cf. Chart 14. The increase in the 1st half-year was driven by high economic activity and rising core inflation. In the same period the Federal Reserve raised the fed funds target rate by a total of 1 percentage point in four increments to reach 5.25 per cent. From then on it was not raised further. The 10-year yield fell in the 2nd half-year amid declining economic growth as a result of a slowdown in the housing market, among other factors. This led to expectations that the fed funds target rate would be lowered in the 1st half of 2007.

10-YEAR YIELDS IN THE USA, THE EURO AREA, JAPAN AND THE UK

Chart 14

Note: Weekly observations. For the euro area, the yield on a 10-year German government bond is used.
Source: Reuters EcoWin.

In the euro area, the yield on the benchmark 10-year German government bond increased from approximately 3.3 per cent at the beginning of 2006 to approximately 3.9 per cent at year-end, cf. Chart 14. Viewed over the year, the development mirrored the course in the US with a rising yield in the 1st half-year, and a falling yield in the 2nd half-year. However, the decline in the 10-year German yield in the 2nd half-year was less marked than in the USA. This is presumably attributable to the sound economic growth in the euro area, which led to expectations of further monetary-policy tightening. During 2006 the European Central Bank, ECB, raised its key interest rate in five increments from 2.25 per cent to 3.5 per cent, and then to 3.75 per cent in March 2007.

Long-term interest rates generally tended to increase less than short-term interest rates, and the yield curves thus flattened in 2006, cf. Chart 15. In the USA, the yield curve inverted around the turn of the year 2005/06, and the spread between the US 10-year and 2-year yields was negative for most of the year. The rising short-term interest rates reflected monetary-policy tightening in reaction to the global upswing. Unlike in previous upswings, long-term interest rates have not increased; in fact they are low in a historical perspective. This is attributable to such factors as low and stable inflation expectations and purchases of government bonds by pension funds and Asian central banks.

YIELD CURVES IN THE USA AND THE EURO AREA, BEGINNING AND END OF 2006

Chart 15

Note: For the euro area, the German yield curve is used.
Source: Nordea Analytics.

The yield on the benchmark Japanese 10-year government bond rose from approximately 1.5 per cent at the beginning of 2006 to approximately 1.7 per cent at year-end, cf. Chart 14. In the 1st quarter, the upswing in the Japanese economy led the 10-year yield to rise to above 2 per cent. Subsequently, economic growth receded, and long-term interest rates fell. Combined with rising inflation, the upswing was sufficiently robust for the Bank of Japan to abandon the zero-interest-rate policy pursued since 2001. In July 2006 and again in February 2007 the Bank of Japan raised its official interest rate by 0.25 percentage points to a total of 0.5 per cent from a level of 0 per cent.

In the UK, the yield on the benchmark 10-year government bond increased from approximately 4.1 per cent at the beginning of 2006 to approximately 4.7 per cent at year-end, cf. Chart 14. The long-term interest rates rose up to the beginning of May and – in contrast to several other countries – then remained stable. At the end of November, the 10-year yield exceeded the equivalent US yield, inter alia reflecting renewed momentum in the British housing market and improved growth prospects for the UK.

The 10-year Danish yield spread to the euro area was modest and stable in 2006, cf. Chart 16. The yield on the benchmark 10-year government bond increased from approximately 3.3 per cent at the beginning of 2006 to approximately 3.9 per cent at year-end. At end-2006, the yield spread to Germany was slightly negative.

10-YEAR YIELD SPREADS TO GERMANY

Chart 16

Note: Weekly observations. For the euro area, the yield on a 10-year German government bond is used.
Source: Reuters EcoWin.

During 2006 and the beginning of 2007 Danmarks Nationalbank followed all of the ECB's interest-rate adjustments and moreover unilaterally raised the lending rate by 0.1 percentage point in February 2006, cf. p. 33f. After the interest-rate increase in March 2007 the lending rate was 4.0 per cent, while the discount and current-account rates were 3.75 per cent.

The yield on the benchmark Swedish 10-year government bond rose from approximately 3.4 per cent to approximately 4.1 per cent in the 1st half-year. In the 2nd half-year, the yield fell again to approximately 3.8 per cent at end-2006. The interest-rate drop in the 2nd half-year was more pronounced in Sweden than in the euro area, and the yield spread narrowed, cf. Chart 16. The yield spread ended the year at -0.2 percentage points. Sveriges Riksbank raised the repo rate by 1.5 percentage points in six stages in 2006. In February 2007, Sveriges Riksbank increased the repo rate by a further 0.25 percentage points to 3.25 per cent.

In Norway, the yield on the benchmark 10-year government bond increased from approximately 3.7 per cent at the beginning of 2006 to approximately 4.4 per cent at year-end. During 2006 Norges Bank raised the sight deposit rate on five occasions by a total of 1.25 percentage points. In January 2007, Norges Bank again raised the sight deposit rate by 0.25 percentage points to 3.75 per cent.

FOREIGN-EXCHANGE MARKETS

The US dollar weakened against the euro in 2006, Cf. Chart 17. In total, the dollar depreciated by approximately 11 per cent against the euro, to 1.32 dollars per euro at year-end. The dollar's weakening in relation to the euro is attributable to such factors as expectations of rising growth in the euro area compared with the outlook for the US economy. In addition, the ECB was expected to tighten its monetary policy relative to the Federal Reserve.

DOLLAR VIS-À-VIS EURO

Chart 17

Note: Weekly observations.
Source: Reuters EcoWin.

The Chinese renminbi strengthened by approximately 3 per cent against the dollar to 7.81 renminbi per dollar at end-2006. As in previous years, the People's Bank of China made substantial foreign-exchange purchases in order to curb its currency's strengthening against the dollar. As a consequence, the foreign-exchange reserve increased further. In mid-2005 the People's Bank of China switched to a managed float of the exchange rate.

During 2006 the Japanese yen weakened by approximately 13 per cent against the euro and by approximately 1 per cent against the dollar. The weakening was to some extent attributable to the yen's role in financing carry trades, whereby investors borrow in low-interest currencies such as the yen and invest in high-interest currencies like the US dollar. The depreciation of the yen vis-à-vis the dollar in 2006 was, however, not as pronounced as in 2005. This in part reflected expectations of a narrowing of the yield spread between the two countries, which would reduce the expected gain from carry trades. At the end of 2006 the exchange rate was 156.86 yen per euro.

The pound sterling appreciated by approximately 2 per cent against the euro in 2006. In the 1st quarter sterling weakened, but then the trend reversed to an overall strengthening for the year, cf. Chart 18. The background includes relatively high interest rates in the UK compared with elsewhere.

POUND STERLING, NORWEGIAN KRONE AND SWEDISH KRONA VIS-À-VIS EURO

Chart 18

Note: Weekly observations.
Source: Reuters EcoWin.

The Swedish krona strengthened against the euro in 2006, partly in response to positive growth prospects and expectations that Sveriges Riksbank would raise the repo rate. At end-2006, the krona had appreciated by approximately 4 per cent, to 9.04 kronor per euro. In February 2007 part of the strengthening from 2006 fell away. The weakening was due to declining interest-rate expectations after Sveriges Riksbank signalled that interest-rate expectations in the market were excessive.

To a great extent the Norwegian krone fluctuated with oil prices in 2006. Rising oil prices in the 1st half-year led the Norwegian krone to strengthen vis-à-vis the euro. As oil prices began to ease downwards in the late summer, the Norwegian krone weakened. Oil prices picked up again from around mid-October, and the Norwegian krone strengthened, but not sufficiently to counteract the weakening. Overall, the Norwegian krone depreciated by approximately 3 per cent in 2006, to 8.23 Norwegian kroner per euro.

The Icelandic krona weakened substantially in 2006, cf. Box 4.

THE ICELANDIC KRONA WAS UNDER PRESSURE IN 2006

Box 4

There was turbulence in the Icelandic economy in 2006. As a result, the Icelandic krona weakened substantially and the stock market plunged, cf. the Chart. The unrest came in response to concern about the development in the Icelandic economy and the financing base of the Icelandic banks.

Growth has been high in recent years, driven by domestic demand. Massive energy investments have particularly contributed to growth. In addition, more liberal home financing has underpinned rising house prices, which has stimulated private consumption. The robust domestic demand has led to major imbalances in the Icelandic economy, including a massive current-account deficit, and very high external debt.

Demand pressures, combined with the weakening of the krona, led to even higher inflation, and the inflation target of 2.5 per cent continued to be exceeded. In an attempt to meet the inflation target, Seðlabanka Íslands raised the repo rate on seven occasions in 2006, by a total of 3.75 percentage points to 14.25 per cent.

The concern relating to the Icelandic banks was due to the substantial volume of short-term loans they have raised in the international financial markets. This capital has been used to finance Icelandic corporate groups' purchases of enterprises abroad, but also to increase lending to foreign customers and to participate in syndicated loans.

In February, the imbalances in the economy led the Fitch rating agency to express concern about the creditworthiness of the Icelandic government. Subsequently, reports and analyses of the Icelandic economy and Icelandic banks led to further concern. The reports intensified the nervousness in the financial markets.

In 2006 overall, the Icelandic krona weakened by approximately 25 per cent vis-à-vis the euro, and the exchange rate closed the year at 93.61 Icelandic kronur per euro. The development in the stock market reversed in the 2nd half-year, and the Icelandic stock index rose by approximately 13 per cent in 2006. In December, Standard & Poor's downgraded Iceland's credit rating, but this only affected the financial markets to a limited degree. The downgrading came in response to the government's indication that it would ease fiscal policy up to the election in 2007, despite the macroeconomic imbalances.

ICELANDIC KRONA VIS-À-VIS EURO AND ICELANDIC STOCKS

Source: Reuters EcoWin.

 

STOCK MARKETS

The global stock markets rose in 2006 despite a downturn in mid-year. There were sound increases for US and European stocks, while the increase for Japanese stocks was more moderate, cf. Chart 19. The lower prices in mid-year were attributable to greater investor uncertainty and a resulting shift to safer assets.

STOCK INDICES FOR THE USA, THE EURO AREA AND JAPAN

Chart 19

Note: Weekly observations.
Source: Bloomberg.

The US S& P 500 stock index rose by 14 per cent in 2006. A slight increasing trend was seen up to mid-May, when uncertainty regarding future US monetary policy increased. The economic indicators pointed to slower growth, but there were continued indications of rising inflation. This led to fears that US monetary policy would be tightened more than so far expected, with the risk that growth would dampen further. The uncertainty pushed down US stocks and led to general unrest in the global stock markets, particularly in the emerging markets, cf. Box 5. In the 2nd half of 2006 there were sound price increases in the US market. The underlying factors included dampened inflation expectations, among other things related to falling oil prices. In addition, sound corporate earnings, falling long-term interest rates and increasing merger and acquisition activity contributed to the positive price development.

THE UNREST IN THE STOCK MARKETS IN MAY 2006

Box 5

From 10 May 2006 and approximately one month thereafter, the global stock markets were characterised by unrest and falling prices. Several factors indicate that the general and sudden price drops express increasing investor uncertainty and a consequential rise in the risk premium required on investments in stocks and other high-risk assets. All other things being equal, a higher risk premium entails that the price investors are willing to pay for a given asset is lower.

Uncertainty in the stock markets is often measured by the VIX index, which is a measure of the expected future volatility in the US S& P index. A high value for the VIX index reflects expectations of large fluctuations in the stock index and thus a higher risk for investors. The Chart below shows that the VIX index rose significantly in the period when stock prices were falling.

Moreover, the greatest decline was seen in the stock markets subject to highest risk, which supports the thesis that the stocks fell as a result of higher risk premiums. As the Chart shows, the three main indices for emerging markets dropped substantially in connection with the unrest in May. Normally, investments in emerging markets are deemed to entail a far greater risk than investments in e.g. US stocks. Declining prices also affected other high-risk assets. For example, speculative movement away from precious and industrial metals was seen, which led to strong downward correction. This followed a sustained period of rising metal prices.

The unrest in the stock markets arose at a time when US monetary policy had been tightened repeatedly and there were general expectations that the series of interest-rate increases was coming to an end. Since economic indicators at the beginning of May pointed to both receding growth and rising inflation, greater uncertainty arose regarding the future monetary policy. Concern that the US monetary-policy authorities would continue to raise interest rates despite the more subdued growth prospects was presumably the most important factor behind the stock-market unrest in May 2006.

At the end of February 2007, new uncertainty arose in the stock markets, with strongly increasing volatility and falling prices. Again, the price drops were largest in the high-risk markets.

UNCERTAINTY IN THE STOCK MARKETS AND FALLING PRICES FOR HIGH-RISK STOCKS

Note: Daily observations.
Source: Bloomberg.

Stocks in the euro area mirrored US stocks closely again in 2006, but with a general tendency for slightly stronger increases. Underlying factors included the positive economic development in the euro area, a high level of acquisition activity, and sound corporate earnings. The European stock index, S& P Euro, rose by 19 per cent in 2006.

The Japanese Nikkei 225 stock index increased by a modest 7 per cent in 2006. This should be viewed against the background of the previous year's very substantial increase.

The Scandinavian stock markets took the same course as euro area stocks in 2006. However, Danish stocks did not perform near as well as Swedish and Norwegian stocks in 2006, cf. Chart 20.

STOCK INDICES FOR DENMARK, SWEDEN AND NORWAY

Chart 20

Note: Weekly observations.
Source: Bloomberg.

The Danish OMXC20 index improved by 12 per cent in 2006. Most stocks in the index rose. The largest contributions to the positive development in the index came from Vestas, which increased by 130 per cent, and Novo Nordisk. The A.P. Moller - Maersk stock fell in 2006, thereby reducing the increase in the overall index.

The Swedish OMX index rose by 20 per cent in 2006. TeliaSonera, Nordea Bank and H& M contributed most to the increase in the index. LM Ericsson, which accounts for a very large share of the Swedish index, rose marginally in 2006.

The Norwegian stock index, OBX, rose by 34 per cent. Telenor and Norsk Hydro, the two largest stocks in the index, contributed most to the increase. In 2007 Norsk Hydro and Statoil plan to merge their oil and gas activities in a new company that will become the world's largest offshore operating company.

 

Go to bottom
Publication in PDF-format
 
PC: Press the right mouse-button, choose "Save Link As", then choose where to save the file.
 
MAC: Hold down the mouse-button, choose "Save Link", then choose where to save the file.
 
Download
Acrobat Reader here:

 
 
 
Go to previous chapter               Go to top              Go to next chapter